Eliminate endless warfare and welfare, create more tariffs, reduce the size of government, restore the ability to create money debt free and taxes are no longer needed.
Reverse 1913 - year that the Federal Reserve and income tax got created.
Yep, that's why he should NOT mention it and first drain the Deep State and bring people like Soros to justice (he's just a handle for Rothschilds though), but nevertheless, a powerful one.
Well ‘taxing labor’ is a form of slavery. It also fails in applying equality under the law as the tax burden is different for different people. We should move to raising taxes as we did prior to 1913.
I think that will be easily accomplished - once we get rid of even a fourth of the graft in every layer of our Local, State and Federal government - even an eighth.
Go read this: A Solution for This Week’s Mystery Announcement, By Clarice Feldman
POTUS: "I have a lot of enemies. This may be the last time you see me for a while. I have a lot of very rich enemies. They're not happy with what I'm doing. But I figure we have one chance to do it. No other president is gonna do what I do."
Brian Cates offered up one suggestion that made the most sense to me. The DoJ is going full bore against the largest international money launderers and there is concern about retaliation against him.
The Bidens were not the only Democrats who apparently rode the Ukrainian merry-go-round. PrivatBank’s owner paid the husband of Democrat congresswoman Debbie Mucarsel-Powell $700,000, ostensibly for legal services.
PrivatBank has been a subject of scrutiny for some time as almost 2 billion dollars it received in bailout funds, partially from the U.S. and International Monetary Fund, mysteriously vanished:
Neal Boortz is a big supporter of the Fair Tax. He wrote a book about it. Herman Cain was a big supporter. Look it up. It pretty much eliminates the IRS.
The only place payroll taxes paid in have anything to do with benefits paid out is on accounting reports that belong in the fiction section of the library.
There are no "trust funds," and there never were. The federal government has been happily spending excess funds and putting worthless IOUs into a "lockbox" that never existed.
FDR's satanic trick was to mislead otherwise rational people into believing that their benefits are linked to their contributions. I can go on SSA's website and see how much they've taken from me each year for nearly four decades and what I can expect to get each month after I retire. While it is all laid out in black and white, the level of detail is a distraction from the fact that the money is not there and will need to be raised or borrowed.
The only way out of this disaster is to grow the economy.
Cutting tax rates almost invariably results in increased government revenue. The "Laffer Curve" argument is that there is some sweet spot of a min-max that provides the greatest government revenues from the least tax burden.
I think Laffer was only half right. The real problem is that taxing productivity is downright retarded.
can we just go back to the days when we ran the country off of tariffs revenue? granted we'll need to get rid of a lot of dumb social programs
Yep!
Eliminate endless warfare and welfare, create more tariffs, reduce the size of government, restore the ability to create money debt free and taxes are no longer needed.
Reverse 1913 - year that the Federal Reserve and income tax got created.
Recommended Book: "No more national debt"
Yep, that's why he should NOT mention it and first drain the Deep State and bring people like Soros to justice (he's just a handle for Rothschilds though), but nevertheless, a powerful one.
Hnnngghhh... yes!
Well ‘taxing labor’ is a form of slavery. It also fails in applying equality under the law as the tax burden is different for different people. We should move to raising taxes as we did prior to 1913.
I'm going to have to call a doctor in 4 hours.
Or stop by my place... ; )
A/s/l?
This isn’t entirely true. He is referring to terminating payback of the deferral permanently, not the tax itself.
I think that will be easily accomplished - once we get rid of even a fourth of the graft in every layer of our Local, State and Federal government - even an eighth.
Go read this: A Solution for This Week’s Mystery Announcement, By Clarice Feldman
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/08/a_solution_for_this_weeks_mystery_announcement.html
And when your reading that remember the billions that went missing from the State Department under Hillary Clinton's watch
Incomes under 100,000 will pay no taxes. What about the rest? How is that different than tax the rich? Read and understand before virtue signalling.
I've seen some libtards countering that he's also abolishing social security.
I haven't seen anything concrete on this. Isn't it the citizen's payments into that fund that will be stopped?
"Listen you motherfuckers we're gonna tax you 25%" will now be America's foreign policy, not its domestic policy
Neal Boortz is a big supporter of the Fair Tax. He wrote a book about it. Herman Cain was a big supporter. Look it up. It pretty much eliminates the IRS.
Gonna be tough for those dependent on Social Security & Medicare, but they should have worked & saved harder!
Why?
The only place payroll taxes paid in have anything to do with benefits paid out is on accounting reports that belong in the fiction section of the library.
There are no "trust funds," and there never were. The federal government has been happily spending excess funds and putting worthless IOUs into a "lockbox" that never existed.
FDR's satanic trick was to mislead otherwise rational people into believing that their benefits are linked to their contributions. I can go on SSA's website and see how much they've taken from me each year for nearly four decades and what I can expect to get each month after I retire. While it is all laid out in black and white, the level of detail is a distraction from the fact that the money is not there and will need to be raised or borrowed.
The only way out of this disaster is to grow the economy.
Cutting tax rates almost invariably results in increased government revenue. The "Laffer Curve" argument is that there is some sweet spot of a min-max that provides the greatest government revenues from the least tax burden.
I think Laffer was only half right. The real problem is that taxing productivity is downright retarded.
Nice B8 M8.