I know. I still see Ben Shapiro get recommended to me if I look up enough conservative content on YouTube. Ben Shapiro is right some of the time and I think for some people he could be a good starting point but I don't want anyone to get stuck on him. With Google censoring conservatives people cannot advance to something else after starting out with Ben Shapiro. In addition Ben Shapiro only gets recommended when viewing lots of conservative content already. Not like before where he could get recommended to normal users.
Knowles is the goat. I like Walsh and Klaven too but Knowles has the “it” factor. My wife who is green to politics listens to Shapiro but I can hear more and more Knowles from her phone as she’s breast feeding our 3 month old boy. Every time I do, I know I married the right woman.
Shapiro is needed. There are plenty of people who enjoy conservative values with a touch of left. Ben has an awkward stiffness to him, but he's level headed with a lot of his responses. I actually think his Rogan spot the other week went well.
Ben Shapiro's role is an early redpill for many, after a while you move past him and see some of his anti-trump stuff and then just forget about him, it's what happened to me. Back in 2017/2018 I watched some of the "libtard destroyed" compilations on Youtube and then moved onto other people like Steven Crowder and left Ben Shapiro behind.
Ben has some good content and I agree with him on a whole hell of a lot. I think I'd enjoy a 10-15 minute conversation with the guy. That being said he's not the guiding light for my ideology.
Governments are just mafias with an air of legitimacy.
They take a cut of all the business that happens on their turf, and they enforce contracts, making complex trade agreements like insurance and stocks possible.
The NAP is a fallacy, there will always be the threat of force. Governments will always have the upper hand militarily. But they are kept in line by making the cost of victory too high.
The NAP is not a fallacy, it's a tautology. It says that all interactions must be voluntary to be ethical. It's always true, it's merely a reflection on ethics, sorry you don't like it or don't understand ethics. Your blackpill attitude that ethical government is not possible is all your own. Sounds like a justification for anarchism and a might-makes-right attitude.
Not anarchism, seeing governments for what they really are.
They aren’t there to keep us safe or protect our rights, any more than the mafia protects the neighborhoods it controls. It does that to keep business going it can take a cut from.
How does a government enforce anything without aggression?
We want them just stopping aggression of others, but the government is run by people just like us. They aren’t angels.
To be honest this is a more nuanced position than I would have expected from Google. As in, their enmity for conservatism seems moderate rather than full-on TDS.
Leftists are evil, but they aren’t stupid. Assume your enemy is as smart or smarter than you and you will never be surprised by their conniving tactics. Stay vigilant pedes.
Yeah, so he's talking about shaping narratives at the end of the transcript, and without any reservation he calls right leaning news outlets fake news. Literally, slid that shit in there!
Matt Schlap the guy who runs CPAC invited the antifa goon that was later arrested for trying to tear down Andrew Jackson's statue in DC. Yet kicked out Laura Loomer and Owen Shroyer from infowars. I hope the commie, neocon, RiNo sell out matt is enjoying his google bucks.
Someone in one of the comments brought up a good point. RINO are also trying to steer the movement back to cuckservativism.
That’s why their pushing people like Ben Shapiro, and other neocons instead of real conservatives.
I know. I still see Ben Shapiro get recommended to me if I look up enough conservative content on YouTube. Ben Shapiro is right some of the time and I think for some people he could be a good starting point but I don't want anyone to get stuck on him. With Google censoring conservatives people cannot advance to something else after starting out with Ben Shapiro. In addition Ben Shapiro only gets recommended when viewing lots of conservative content already. Not like before where he could get recommended to normal users.
I think Google is paying Fox News for their shift
I don't pay enough attention to Fox to notice a shift, but I'd still wager you're correct. And who's paying Google for their shift?
Google
CHYNA
Stopped listening to Benny boy and switched to based Michael Knowles. Never looked back.
Knowles is the goat. I like Walsh and Klaven too but Knowles has the “it” factor. My wife who is green to politics listens to Shapiro but I can hear more and more Knowles from her phone as she’s breast feeding our 3 month old boy. Every time I do, I know I married the right woman.
Shapiro is needed. There are plenty of people who enjoy conservative values with a touch of left. Ben has an awkward stiffness to him, but he's level headed with a lot of his responses. I actually think his Rogan spot the other week went well.
I agree, I like the videos of him annihilating liberals and that's the point I was trying to make earlier.
He's an useful tool. lol.
Ben Shapiro's role is an early redpill for many, after a while you move past him and see some of his anti-trump stuff and then just forget about him, it's what happened to me. Back in 2017/2018 I watched some of the "libtard destroyed" compilations on Youtube and then moved onto other people like Steven Crowder and left Ben Shapiro behind.
Ben has some good content and I agree with him on a whole hell of a lot. I think I'd enjoy a 10-15 minute conversation with the guy. That being said he's not the guiding light for my ideology.
I like Michael Knowles and Klavan was a big influence in me becoming a Christian
America First!
Look at what's happened to Fox News since Paul Ryan stepped into the picture.
A steered "conservative" movement looks a lot like the Libertarians.
Zing
I don’t understand! We’ve done nothing and things keep going wrong!
No no no, they just want "fair taxes" you guys. Nevermind that taxation violates the fucking NAP.
Thats where the blackpill starts to get absorbed.
Governments are just mafias with an air of legitimacy.
They take a cut of all the business that happens on their turf, and they enforce contracts, making complex trade agreements like insurance and stocks possible.
The NAP is a fallacy, there will always be the threat of force. Governments will always have the upper hand militarily. But they are kept in line by making the cost of victory too high.
The NAP is not a fallacy, it's a tautology. It says that all interactions must be voluntary to be ethical. It's always true, it's merely a reflection on ethics, sorry you don't like it or don't understand ethics. Your blackpill attitude that ethical government is not possible is all your own. Sounds like a justification for anarchism and a might-makes-right attitude.
Not anarchism, seeing governments for what they really are.
They aren’t there to keep us safe or protect our rights, any more than the mafia protects the neighborhoods it controls. It does that to keep business going it can take a cut from.
How does a government enforce anything without aggression?
We want them just stopping aggression of others, but the government is run by people just like us. They aren’t angels.
It's what they did with the TEA Party too. We aren't supposed to win, thrive, or survive.
"For the [...] Liberal, “freedom” means government by liberals. Or at least, the absence of government by non-liberals."
We are under constant assault by potential co-opters and bad actors.
Ben Shapiro is the IT Director for NeverTrump.
To be honest this is a more nuanced position than I would have expected from Google. As in, their enmity for conservatism seems moderate rather than full-on TDS.
That's just one person. There are people who work for gulag that hate anything even remotely close to or resembling conservatism.
That was the only person at google that could talk about it without foaming at the mouth.
Not surprising. Google literally funded CPAC.
Leftists are evil, but they aren’t stupid. Assume your enemy is as smart or smarter than you and you will never be surprised by their conniving tactics. Stay vigilant pedes.
The answer is
NO
~TRUMP 2020~
Audio on Tucker: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_HAeGe03DE
They want Ben Shapiro vs Literally Mao
Go check out the Mises Institute.
Yeah, so he's talking about shaping narratives at the end of the transcript, and without any reservation he calls right leaning news outlets fake news. Literally, slid that shit in there!
Matt Schlap the guy who runs CPAC invited the antifa goon that was later arrested for trying to tear down Andrew Jackson's statue in DC. Yet kicked out Laura Loomer and Owen Shroyer from infowars. I hope the commie, neocon, RiNo sell out matt is enjoying his google bucks.
What a beasty bunch! (From the transcript) Any of these critters in here?
Big Tent Conservatives
National Security Conservatives
Economic Conservatives
Libertarians
Log Cabin Republicans
Deficit hawks
Small government advocates
Blue Tick Democrats
Botfly Progressives
Bombardier Beetle Economists
I want a smaller government and less national debt.
Rocky mountain spotted democrats.
its going to come once AI is sophisticated enough one way or the other.
It's going to get worse. They are already doing it today.
The joke might be on the Left-fags.
AI is very logic based. Advanced intelligences would terminate liberals in a microsecond.
Simulations with a Samaritan like AI is a possibility of what's to come.
AI is very [logic] based.
So start migrating to a company and platform that is actively combating Facebook, Google, engagement algorithms and malicious A.I.
Whoa whoa whoa you guys. Remember, this is just a baseless CoNsPiraCy tHeoRY. The Democrats said so.
All we did was stop using google. Checkmate bitches.
One word for Google-ANTITRUST
There's plenty of "steering" happening right here on thedonald.win.