3371
Comments (490)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
21
ecelol 21 points ago +26 / -5

yep pretty much. I'm conflicted because on one hand, he should go after the traitors and throw em in jail. On the other, we should not weaponize and politicize the justice system. That being said, the democrats will never accept the latter, when they are in power. Sad.

20
deleted 20 points ago +24 / -4
6
molecularpimpin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep. It took me until fall of last year to realize there would be no indictments for those top 15 or so names we all knew about since 2016. I give it another maybe 30% chance that a single indictment will be handed to one of them by the end of 2024.

3
lanre 3 points ago +3 / -0

They would all implicate Obama so nothing will be done.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ecelol 1 point ago +1 / -0

true 100%

I agree, especially with Ilhan Omar.

I was referring more so to Obama's indiscretions. It's quite the conundrum. Say you have proof, enough for a court of law but bendable in the court of public opinion that Obama + team spied on the Trump campaign. Do you arrest Obama+team just prior to the election? See, if it's true, then Obama+team should be tried for treason. The thing is, if you do so, you look like a third world Pakistani dictator... which could fuck you with the independent vote. It's a delicate game. I think we all know he did it, the only thing left to see is what Trump+Barr+Durham end up deciding to do. Maybe they could spin it into an "October surprise", where they announce some kind of criminal conspiracy.

8
QueenMAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's not being weaponized if crimes were really committed

Which they were

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1