3371
Comments (490)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 5 points ago +16 / -11

Or he knows what is coming and needs mountains of evidence and doesn't fall for their distractions to paint him as politicizing the DOJ.

13
deleted 13 points ago +18 / -5
-3
DNC_Ballot_QATeam -3 points ago +10 / -13

Are you Dr Seuss? Omar not being prosecuted is hearsay by the same "veteran insider" everyone is quoting. Citizens and watch dog groups can take this head on. We have a forest on fire and you are crying about a small grease fire. I would say timing has helped Omar. But she is not in the clear.

5
ex67v 5 points ago +6 / -1

Putting out a small grease fire would at least be a start. Give us a reason to have some hope that Justice actually applies to the left. Omar is low-hanging fruit. Put an entry level justice department prosecutor on it... unless there really is a multi-tier justice system (with the left occupying the highest, untouchable tier)

3.75 years and no high profile justice for absolute slam dunk offences that would land you or I in prison.

So tired of all the apologetic excuses. So weak.

-3
DNC_Ballot_QATeam -3 points ago +2 / -5

They know they will be accused of tyranny by the hysterical left and their guard dog media. It's an election year and if you are gonna pick a battle you cut off the head. The obvious 500lb monster in the corner with a mountain of evidence. RICO cases have a methodology. Going after the small fish doesn't work and it actually works against you.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
lanre 2 points ago +4 / -2

How can you be this delusional? The fake opposition GOP lost the 2018 election according to plan, they're doing their best to lose 2020, and even if they win they'll impeach Trump again before they left him go after one of their own.

Barr could throw everyone in jail tomorrow without bail and they'd be out in weeks once the election is over.

-3
DNC_Ballot_QATeam -3 points ago +2 / -5

Historical case with exaggerations on both sides muddying the waters. D.C. judges that run protection, media complicit, angry mobs on both sides that will both end up angry in the end. Whatever happens will need more evidence than usual to prove there was no politicizing.

2
lanre 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's less than 3 months until the election. Horrible planning to not prosecute until this late in the game. If Trump loses all that work goes out the window and you've just painted a huge "kill me" target on your back, with zero protection.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dislike the Q following as much as anyone. I also don't have a Twitter account. What specifically did I mention that is not accurate?