While I understand the sentiment, I respectfully disagree. A firearm is simply a tool. It has no political or ideological affiliation. Regardless of who they are designed, produced and used by, no model of firearm owes any loyalty to a particular group. I'm an AR guy and prefer to own American-made guns, and I certainly have no love for communist governments or terrorists, but I respect Mikhail Kalashnikov for his work as the creator of a classic, proven and dependable rifle design which is now used all over the world, both for good and evil. Remember, it's not the gun that has the intent. It's the shooter.
The AK-47 is the gun of communists and terrorists.
He should be holding an AR-15 instead.
While I understand the sentiment, I respectfully disagree. A firearm is simply a tool. It has no political or ideological affiliation. Regardless of who they are designed, produced and used by, no model of firearm owes any loyalty to a particular group. I'm an AR guy and prefer to own American-made guns, and I certainly have no love for communist governments or terrorists, but I respect Mikhail Kalashnikov for his work as the creator of a classic, proven and dependable rifle design which is now used all over the world, both for good and evil. Remember, it's not the gun that has the intent. It's the shooter.
I was just joking around.
Ik that Guns don’t have loyalty (In WWI the majority of the World’s rifles [Including our own] were based on Germany’s Gewehr 98).