And you think you will be more free under a literal dictatorship? You would trade one form of tyranny for another. How short sighted can you possibly be? Why did the Founders give us a Republic and not a monarchy? You think they didn't know the benefits of a benevolent dictator? I promise, they are superior to both you and I for their wisdom. And yes, they warned us 200 years ago we must be VIGILANT or we will lose our liberties! WE failed, not them! WE failed to be vigilant!
Technically our form of government was suitable for anyone, good, bad, indifferent, or militant lesbian. The problem arises when we let the cocksuckers slide for so long, eroding long-standing principles an inch at a time. We had to know it was over when a state decided killing already born babies was legal, and the capital wasn't burned down that night.
I get what you're saying, but we really need to look further ahead than the next five or ten years. This is critical. We are rapidly losing hold of our national identity because people are seeking alternative systems (see: marxism) rather than bothering to understand the one we were founded on.
Republics have 2 century lifespans. We don't need an emperor, we need a reset button. Don't make your reply to leftists trying to destroy everything this country was built on to destroy it another way. It'll kust play right back into their hands in a couple generations because power will have been totally consolidated.
After seeing what a peice of shit our Congress is, we don't need the cocksuckers. I'm down to make trump the supreme emperor.
Our form of government was only adequate for a moral and religious people. Those days are over.
No legislature can stop the left. Authoritarianism must be responded to in kind.
Then you'll end up with an authoritarian government fit for an immoral people. You will never be free again.
And you think you will be more free under a literal dictatorship? You would trade one form of tyranny for another. How short sighted can you possibly be? Why did the Founders give us a Republic and not a monarchy? You think they didn't know the benefits of a benevolent dictator? I promise, they are superior to both you and I for their wisdom. And yes, they warned us 200 years ago we must be VIGILANT or we will lose our liberties! WE failed, not them! WE failed to be vigilant!
Technically our form of government was suitable for anyone, good, bad, indifferent, or militant lesbian. The problem arises when we let the cocksuckers slide for so long, eroding long-standing principles an inch at a time. We had to know it was over when a state decided killing already born babies was legal, and the capital wasn't burned down that night.
Shit, what else do they need to do?
the only problem with that is when you get a bad emperor lol
I agree but also feel that Dictator Trump is the only way to save the country right now
benign dictatorship who's values you agree with does seem like the ideal. but its hard to keep it that way, hah
Yeah exactly. I know it's wrong but I still want it just for Trump!
I get what you're saying, but we really need to look further ahead than the next five or ten years. This is critical. We are rapidly losing hold of our national identity because people are seeking alternative systems (see: marxism) rather than bothering to understand the one we were founded on.
Interesting! But what if Biden became emperor, LOL
Republics have 2 century lifespans. We don't need an emperor, we need a reset button. Don't make your reply to leftists trying to destroy everything this country was built on to destroy it another way. It'll kust play right back into their hands in a couple generations because power will have been totally consolidated.