Good, because 'stability' for Lebanon until today meant its people were under the control of Hezbollah. It's a good thing when countries controlled by terrorist armies become destabilized.
You're right about people like Hezbollah not giving up power - somebody else has to take it from them. This is an opportunity for somebody else to do that. Hezbollah should have been disarmed along with all the other militias when the civil war was ended - this was an explicit term of the agreement that all other groups except Hezbollah adhered to. I'd like to see it enforced now.
Not at all. This makes everything much MORE stable, as soon as Iran fills the power vacuum. Whether this was a legitimate accident or accidentally on purpose the outcome is the same. Is Israel surrounded on all sides by the same enemy yet?
This creates a lot of instability in the Middle East.
at this point, what difference does it make?!
Good, because 'stability' for Lebanon until today meant its people were under the control of Hezbollah. It's a good thing when countries controlled by terrorist armies become destabilized.
Exactly. China is "stable" now, look where that got us. Some ideologies should be destablized.
So stability will now be a new puppet government sill controlled by Hezbollah.
Cool. These kinds of people don't give up power because there were riots over the weekend.
You're right about people like Hezbollah not giving up power - somebody else has to take it from them. This is an opportunity for somebody else to do that. Hezbollah should have been disarmed along with all the other militias when the civil war was ended - this was an explicit term of the agreement that all other groups except Hezbollah adhered to. I'd like to see it enforced now.
Since when wasn't there any instability?
Not at all. This makes everything much MORE stable, as soon as Iran fills the power vacuum. Whether this was a legitimate accident or accidentally on purpose the outcome is the same. Is Israel surrounded on all sides by the same enemy yet?