Just out of curiosity, given the left's excuse about insurance covering all the damage so it's okay to burn and loot stories, is there any actual evidence that the BLM rioters and looters actually checked to make sure their targets really did have insurance? Or did they just assume it?
I mean conceivably they could use insurance as an excuse, they'd be wrong but it would imply that they did actually take care to only hurt business that could recover, but to use that excuse, don't they have to first establish that the businesses that they destroy have insurance?
Even then that's a horrible idea. ( Lol which of their ideas is good and thought out ). Insurance claims hurt everybody that buys insurance. Rates will go up across the board with more claims and rates in the affected areas will skyrocket.
Just out of curiosity, given the left's excuse about insurance covering all the damage so it's okay to burn and loot stories, is there any actual evidence that the BLM rioters and looters actually checked to make sure their targets really did have insurance? Or did they just assume it?
I mean conceivably they could use insurance as an excuse, they'd be wrong but it would imply that they did actually take care to only hurt business that could recover, but to use that excuse, don't they have to first establish that the businesses that they destroy have insurance?
Even then that's a horrible idea. ( Lol which of their ideas is good and thought out ). Insurance claims hurt everybody that buys insurance. Rates will go up across the board with more claims and rates in the affected areas will skyrocket.
This will only end badly for them.