People are smart enough to perceive the truth if they really want to. I don't buy the act of feigned ignorance.
We resort to unconventional means to break the trance and programming.
Like Jeremiah the prophet, who literally put stocks on his hands and neck and walked around warning people they'd all be slaves if they didn't repent.
It's getting to that point. Welcome to the new middle ages, where all forms of advanced thought must be masked in a symbol for the mob-thinking zombies - lest they put us on house arrest like Galieo - if we're lucky - or stoned and murdered like every critic of impending disaster in history.
So, I think there are 2 judges being political, getting their dinner party invites. Some are getting headlines, but I don't think they will allow this to continue. You and I know it would go to the SC and they would be thoroughly embarrassed. Do they want to be known for that? No.
There was some of that, but for the most part, appeals courts make you argue against your opponent, but it is done through the judges. It's different. It isn't like the court you think you are used to.
I’d tell you to listen to more hearings. They’re designed to be professionally adversarial. There was some BS, but not as much as I think everyone thinks.
They just did. They said they will pick up this case again on December 9th....after the election. They are doing their part to keep Flynn muzzled. He can not be allowed to speak out on what he knows.
It's absolutely amazing that every single democrat in the government operates off the exact same playbook. It doesn't matter if they're a a congressman, senator, prosecutor, or judge they all ask the same snarky, narrative driven questions and talk over the person they're questioning. It's like they're connected to a hivemind.
Well said, very good analogy. The judges sound almost the exact same as those congressional borgs.
I’m surprised one of them hasn’t actually said
I’m reclaiming my time
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Gotta laugh or I’m gonna cry 😢
I also noticed how slow they spoke - like they didn't have a clear argument and didn't know how to proceed or were trying to convey something else beyond their argument.
Judge Pillard sounded like a teenager at one point when she responded, "EXACTLY!", as if she were being rescued by her opponent from her erroneous point of view.
"If the facts are on your side, pound the facts into the table. If the law is on your side, pound the law into the table. If neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table." - Alan Dershowitz
Many of these judges are obviously just pounding the table.
I think Michael Flynn is under a gag order until this case is over and they don't want him talking before the election because he is going to spill the beans.
They're relying on the fact that both parties are so full of cess, that short of mass hangings on the Whitehouse lawn, they are going to be able to operate untouched.
It is funny to hear both the prosecution and the defendant arguing to the judges to dismiss the case, and the judges saying - no we won't do it! Clown world.
Honestly, what would the judges have them do if they decide the prosecution can't drop a case? "No sorry, you have to because it's an election year and we're now a political body". You literally have the judicial branch interfering with the business of the executive branch.
Sideny Powell's point of every single 48a being dropped is perfect. This has NEVER happened, where the Judge won't dismiss when the govt wants to dismiss.
They're arguing in favor of setting precedent that will wreck EVERY SINGLE innocence project overturned conviction and will allow anyone to intervene in a criminal proceeding without anything but anecdotal or political evidence.
Ric Grenell: acting director for each of those positions, to force Cocaine Mitch to appoint OUR selections for a change, instead of only his swampy cover up artists.
‘Hypothetically, if Judge Sullivan was a priest and General Flynn was an evil orangeman, and disregarding all the actual proceedings, could the District Judge hold a hearing to demand that the parties not be racists?’
It feels like these judges are 80% mean to Hero Sidney - they keep interrupting her, shouting her down, not letting her complete her answers. These judges are imbeciles.
They way I heard it, as you're rising through the ranks, when you start to have power to influence how things might go, they invite you to yet another party with the movers and shakers.
Except when you get off the plane, you're on an island and there's naked kids and child sacrifice--and cameras--everywhere. And you get to make a choice.
Join the cabal. Partake of the dark pleasures. Be forever controlled.
Leave the island, never gain any more power or influence, and swear to secrecy on pain of death.
I hope so. Not only are the judges ruling for this case, they do bear in mind future cases which may/will cite this case. There is more at stake here than just General Flynn.
My mentor in law school did a comprehensive study on oral arguments at the Supreme Court level; the finding was that the number and nature of questions are not useful in predicting the outcome of the case, regardless of the subject matter (highly politicized or more apolitical).
His attorney argued that he's "technically" not a "party" even though he's listed as a party and these judges should not consider him a party (which some of the judges agreed with).
You've never met a sanctimonious judge? I guess you've had a very fortunate run. I deal with them all the time, too. There are television shows dedicated to sanctimonious judges
Decades at least. Even if we removed the cancerous leadership from all power, they've infected millions of people with their rhetoric and those people are going to boldly preach the false gospel of Marxism.
It’s not forcing the prosecution it’s about whether or not they get to file an amicus brief. I think that just means they have a few pages written by outside lawyers arguing why the prosecution shouldn’t have dropped the case and that goes into official record. Written by Andrew Weissman of course.
"We do not believe that retaining legal council for several more months is irreparable harm to a person. Just wait for this judge to rule on this case after he literally appointed his own prosecutor. He may still dismiss it. What's wrong with you guys? Don't you just want to let the judge make a decision?"
The court already made a ruling. The ruling to ignore the prosecution dropping the case and to seek it's own case. In other words to become it's own prosecutor.
Pray they don't just re-assign another FAR LEFT DC JUDGE - because they really want the MOCKERY TO CONTINUE... there is no objective Truth left in the DC system...
And the testimony Flynn gave in that other trial - against his business partner - the case where the found the partner guilty... that case was overturned!!! He went free - so all of Fynn's 'Assistance' - was for nothing.
Sullivan should be reprimanded - and significantly.
OMG - Hypothetically, what if Attorney General met on the tarmac with the guilty party and after that, the charges were dismissed.... we can now go back and charge? Maybe we should take them at their word....
Rao knows what's going on here. Sullivan plans a complete shitshow that will drag on forever. It's so disingenuous for Wilkinson to act like Sullivan just wants some quickie hearing.
Bazzinga 💥 justice roberts said what ?? 😂😂
“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said in a statement. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."
"That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for."
Of course, it's like Mattis intervening in politics to say the military shouldn't intervene in politics--because Trump took a walk in the park. Roberts shows his partisan RINO ass by denying judges are partisan. Those who have the most to hide talk the loudest.
Other judges ask questions to clarify. This judge asks questions because its LIKE she doesnt get it, or what's in front of her conflicts with her worldview.
Wall layed out clearly that this shit needs to stop now and the judges aren't having it. They're trying to twist themselves into pretzels to keep this going by twisting the Foker case into something it's not.
Sidney’s argument is rock solid. Sullivan has shown bias beyond doubt. How will these swamp judges rule against her....I mean we know they will...but man the Judiciary branch has totally collapsed.
Here's Garland's chance to prove that he would be an impartial jurist had he made it to SCOTUS and side for dismissal. But he won't, because he''s an Obama hack.
Narrator: He didn’t. He brought up a hypothetical situation about The President spending money unappropriated by Congress in an emergency (which is exactly what’s going on right now) despite him going to bat for Obama (I’ve got a pen and a phone, that’s all I need). This man is a hypocrite and a traitor.
I've been a lawyer in Los Angeles for 32 years and have argued appeals before state and federal (9th Cir) appellate courts.
I have no idea what these judges are doing.
Some really smart people on TheDonald; not the toothless hillbillies the Left has us out to be. MAGA
Mine too, and I'm a lawyer, lol.
I wanted to be a lawyer but they told me I needed to start brushing my teeth. Forget that noise.
I honestly assumed that judges were smart. Not so much. Many had this "weird attitude" vibe. Disrespectful toward Powell.
Mine too and I’m not a lawyer but did stay at a Holiday Inn
But there's a method to the apparent "madness".
People are smart enough to perceive the truth if they really want to. I don't buy the act of feigned ignorance.
We resort to unconventional means to break the trance and programming.
Like Jeremiah the prophet, who literally put stocks on his hands and neck and walked around warning people they'd all be slaves if they didn't repent.
It's getting to that point. Welcome to the new middle ages, where all forms of advanced thought must be masked in a symbol for the mob-thinking zombies - lest they put us on house arrest like Galieo - if we're lucky - or stoned and murdered like every critic of impending disaster in history.
Childish PhD troll checking in ...
Michael Bluthe has entered the chat
The best kind of response.
How would a judge even compel evidence or enforce warrants without a prosecutor?
That’s a racist question
and it comes from place of OBVIOUS PRIVILEGE!
I was a lawyer in another life.
I rode horseback and hollered that "the British are coming, Reeee" in a previous life.
It'd be funny if those fighting the American Revolution of 2020 today are solely the descendants of those who fought the American revolution of 1776.
Likewise the Sons of Tories. What parents truly believe gets passed on. Children listen.
So, I think there are 2 judges being political, getting their dinner party invites. Some are getting headlines, but I don't think they will allow this to continue. You and I know it would go to the SC and they would be thoroughly embarrassed. Do they want to be known for that? No.
This is very normal. If you read transcripts, this is how they argue. They make you defend your position.
There was some of that, but for the most part, appeals courts make you argue against your opponent, but it is done through the judges. It's different. It isn't like the court you think you are used to.
I’d tell you to listen to more hearings. They’re designed to be professionally adversarial. There was some BS, but not as much as I think everyone thinks.
Catching up to this very late. I totally agree with you.
These bastard Neolib judges were simply fishing. One of them was going on and on about a "hypothetical".
It was all a trap and they were trying to trip Sidney up in order to bury her.
Sidney is just TREMENDOUS!
Are they just trying to delay this and drag it out until after the election? Would that work?
They just did. They said they will pick up this case again on December 9th....after the election. They are doing their part to keep Flynn muzzled. He can not be allowed to speak out on what he knows.
Time for civil disobedience on Flynn’s part.
How did this appeal happen so quickly but the follow up be postponed until next year? Can Sidney fight to get it done this year?
Agreed this is disgusting joke.
They just did. December 9th.
Activists feel no shame.
Depends what they're getting in return for the public embarrassment
Oh boy, can I ask you a legal question, pretty please? Just some quick advice, I promise!
It's absolutely amazing that every single democrat in the government operates off the exact same playbook. It doesn't matter if they're a a congressman, senator, prosecutor, or judge they all ask the same snarky, narrative driven questions and talk over the person they're questioning. It's like they're connected to a hivemind.
I agree very Borg like.
Well said, very good analogy. The judges sound almost the exact same as those congressional borgs. I’m surprised one of them hasn’t actually said I’m reclaiming my time 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Gotta laugh or I’m gonna cry 😢
They all get an email every morning from Soros containing their script for the day.
It's how Marxism works. People dance around calling it Marxism but it has a long toxic history. It should be banned in the US.
It's right up there with Adios, America as one of her best.
Thank you, just checked it out from the library!!
I also noticed how slow they spoke - like they didn't have a clear argument and didn't know how to proceed or were trying to convey something else beyond their argument.
Judge Pillard sounded like a teenager at one point when she responded, "EXACTLY!", as if she were being rescued by her opponent from her erroneous point of view.
"If the facts are on your side, pound the facts into the table. If the law is on your side, pound the law into the table. If neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table." - Alan Dershowitz
Many of these judges are obviously just pounding the table.
"when on the island pound the under-agers"
Thank you! Dershowitz is a fucking kiddie diddler
He is a puff diddy who can't help himself enough.
Or if the law and facts aren't on your side, disparage the witness, and destroy her credibly. - Dersh
Nice quote and absolutely applicable.
"...and if the pizza and hotdogs on the table are under 18 pound them too" - Alan Dershowitz
LOL 😂😂😂
I think Michael Flynn is under a gag order until this case is over and they don't want him talking before the election because he is going to spill the beans.
They know they are toast and is literally fighting for their lifes.
They're relying on the fact that both parties are so full of cess, that short of mass hangings on the Whitehouse lawn, they are going to be able to operate untouched.
No he isn't. per Sydney.
gag orders seem as unconstitutional as it gets. I wonder if Trump can override it?
It is funny to hear both the prosecution and the defendant arguing to the judges to dismiss the case, and the judges saying - no we won't do it! Clown world.
Thoroughly and unequivocally against the law.
Democrat privilege
Sounds like an authoritarian communist judicial system to me. If they can do this to a high ranking general, how may no name plebs have they setup.
Honestly, what would the judges have them do if they decide the prosecution can't drop a case? "No sorry, you have to because it's an election year and we're now a political body". You literally have the judicial branch interfering with the business of the executive branch.
Sideny Powell's point of every single 48a being dropped is perfect. This has NEVER happened, where the Judge won't dismiss when the govt wants to dismiss.
Killer questions.
She is a weapon, the sword of GOD
They're arguing in favor of setting precedent that will wreck EVERY SINGLE innocence project overturned conviction and will allow anyone to intervene in a criminal proceeding without anything but anecdotal or political evidence.
Just to get Trump and by Trump I mean US.
Sydney Powell is an awesome fucking lawyer
I loved it when she shut down Griffiths over the 'favoritism' question.
I would love to see her serve in some capacity in President Trump 's second term.
Sydney Powell- Attorney General
Tom Fitton- FBI Director
General Flynn: CIA Director
Ric Grenell: acting director for each of those positions, to force Cocaine Mitch to appoint OUR selections for a change, instead of only his swampy cover up artists.
Those are all great suggestions!
Fittin?
I wish she did a podcast. I could listen to her for hours.
Same. That Hillsdale speech she gave was simply amazing!
‘Hypothetically, if Judge Sullivan was a priest and General Flynn was an evil orangeman, and disregarding all the actual proceedings, could the District Judge hold a hearing to demand that the parties not be racists?’
‘If my client had-‘
‘RECLAIMING MY TIME!’
I heard that in Maxine Water's voice.
THANKS, I hate it.
LMFAO Sidney quoted Ginsburg!!!! Leftist “justice” must be reeeeeeing inside!
It feels like these judges are 80% mean to Hero Sidney - they keep interrupting her, shouting her down, not letting her complete her answers. These judges are imbeciles.
Judges who want to continue prosecuting a person who has been shown to have been set up by the deepstate is VERY telling
Wonder what they're being blackmailed with
death
Epstein Island and Cheese Pizza parties. Pedos the lot of the them.
They way I heard it, as you're rising through the ranks, when you start to have power to influence how things might go, they invite you to yet another party with the movers and shakers.
Except when you get off the plane, you're on an island and there's naked kids and child sacrifice--and cameras--everywhere. And you get to make a choice.
Join the cabal. Partake of the dark pleasures. Be forever controlled.
Leave the island, never gain any more power or influence, and swear to secrecy on pain of death.
Or, death.
I have no evidnece for this scenario.
A big fat slice of cheese pizza most likely
“We just want to keep Flynn from talking because Obama is implicated but the now declassified evidence!” - Commie Judges
The judge wants the prosecutors to argue against their own dismissal
BANANA REPUBLIC
Why do the judges sound so irritable as if they've already decided what they're going to do?
Last time they sound this exact way, but in the end 2/3 judges sided with Flynn. I think it's just part of the gig to sound like a cunt.
I hope so. Not only are the judges ruling for this case, they do bear in mind future cases which may/will cite this case. There is more at stake here than just General Flynn.
Because they have. It's majority dem appointed judges.
They always do that...Devil's advocate kind of thing.
My mentor in law school did a comprehensive study on oral arguments at the Supreme Court level; the finding was that the number and nature of questions are not useful in predicting the outcome of the case, regardless of the subject matter (highly politicized or more apolitical).
Don't read too much into it
We'll see how they treat Sullivan.
To the shill in here downvoting posts...get a fucking life
They’re always here... just ignore them and they’ll go back to making s’mores in their mommies basement before long.
Just so you know this works better if you do it by charcoal fire. Make sure to close the door as it makes them more smokey flavored and authentic.
Can confirm, this works really well!
Best smores I've ever had.
We need voter ID on the_Donald RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!!!!!
Yup, just the usual basement cucks. Ignore.
Wait, so we are now conducting court remotely which is allowing convenient technical difficulties when your horseshit is falling apart?
These cuck judges would argue the constitution doesn't say you can't.
What comes after Jury box?
I’m irate over the behavior of Millett. I looked at her Wikipedia page. Here is why she is so salty:
So we have her AND Garland on the bench today. What a farce.
They're judging the exact bias their peer is guilty of.
We will need to play the hand we have.
They can rig the game.
But, we can turn the table over and punch them in the fucking face.
We can go Might Is Right here. Justice is not being done and it's clear.
Since Sullivan has made himself a party to the case, Flynn can sue him. Not a lawyer.
His attorney argued that he's "technically" not a "party" even though he's listed as a party and these judges should not consider him a party (which some of the judges agreed with).
It's so corrupt.
This bitch judge is so rude, dismissive, and hostile.
Constantly talking over Sidney Powell and not letting her answer the questions.
WTF
She's a judge. It's basically what they do
No they don't. I've dealt with many in my line of work. The vast majority are professional. This one is just a cunt.
You've never met a sanctimonious judge? I guess you've had a very fortunate run. I deal with them all the time, too. There are television shows dedicated to sanctimonious judges
No it's not. She didn't allow Sidney Powell to answer the questions, constantly talked over her, and was extremely unprofessional and rude.
Of course, she's an Obama appointee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Millett
Why are the female judges so bitchy?
Second nature. It's a liberal trait.
Its a feminine trait
They grew up watching Judge Judy
Decades. It will take decades.. Probably 50 years at least
Decades at least. Even if we removed the cancerous leadership from all power, they've infected millions of people with their rhetoric and those people are going to boldly preach the false gospel of Marxism.
Court: "I order the prosecution to carry a case it says it cannot prove.... at least until after election day."
"Attorney for Judge Emmet Sullivan" 🤡🤡
Gold.
Can't even defend himself, pussy.
First they spy on you, next they set you up, then they throw you in jail because they don’t like you.
America 2020 -
RAO IS RAKING HER OVER THE COALS IN A LAWERLY FASHION!
BEAUTIFUL!
Shill alert. Commie fags downvoting today. Be sure to deport them!!
Still voting Trump 2020
Still voting Trump. :)
They could all downvote me and it wouldn’t make a dent in my salt pile!
Take your mask off you dumb cunt you're at home.
But but muh virtue signaling!
If a judge is not legally allowed to prosecute a case.....then a judge cannot continue a case that a prosecutor doesn't want to prosecute.
It's so simple, it's stupid.
They just make the rules up as they go in Clown World.
It’s not forcing the prosecution it’s about whether or not they get to file an amicus brief. I think that just means they have a few pages written by outside lawyers arguing why the prosecution shouldn’t have dropped the case and that goes into official record. Written by Andrew Weissman of course.
These arguments are hilarious.
"We do not believe that retaining legal council for several more months is irreparable harm to a person. Just wait for this judge to rule on this case after he literally appointed his own prosecutor. He may still dismiss it. What's wrong with you guys? Don't you just want to let the judge make a decision?"
The court already made a ruling. The ruling to ignore the prosecution dropping the case and to seek it's own case. In other words to become it's own prosecutor.
Terrifying political maneuvers from the judiciary.
When do we start ignoring their rulings?
the only "what if" I don't see is, "What if people rely on the panel's decision to insert themselves in every criminal court case?"
"What if we set up a secret court to spy on American citizens? What could possibly go wrong?"
Oh...just your garden variety insurrection, treason and election interference.
It seems like a meme to me, but there can be useful questions of what the limiting principle is for a position.
Have to have massive mental gymnastics to wrongfully interpret "shall not be INFRINGED"
pinning them when they try to do it infuriates them. You cant change words to mean what you want them to just because you're losing the argument.
It’s the Billyboy Clinton technique
"Whatever the meaning of "is" is." Bill Clinton.
He wasn’t given the nic “Slick Willy” on accident. 😉
Pray they don't just re-assign another FAR LEFT DC JUDGE - because they really want the MOCKERY TO CONTINUE... there is no objective Truth left in the DC system...
And the testimony Flynn gave in that other trial - against his business partner - the case where the found the partner guilty... that case was overturned!!! He went free - so all of Fynn's 'Assistance' - was for nothing.
Sullivan should be reprimanded - and significantly.
Rao is a Trump Judge. I am liking the difference.
OMG - Hypothetically, what if Attorney General met on the tarmac with the guilty party and after that, the charges were dismissed.... we can now go back and charge? Maybe we should take them at their word....
What if, hypothetically, the Dems are innocent and honest? Hypothetically.
Haaahahahaaaahahhaaaaaaa, hahahaaaahahahahahaaahahahaaa, hahahaaaahahaaaahahahahaaaa
Funny, hypothetically.
My gosh it's like BLM on the bench...
Flynn should just demand Trial by Combat
They would demand a Trial of Seven
Lol
Rao knows what's going on here. Sullivan plans a complete shitshow that will drag on forever. It's so disingenuous for Wilkinson to act like Sullivan just wants some quickie hearing.
”WE DIDN’T GET OUR WAY WITH THREE, SO WE WANT ALL TEN TO RULE TO GET BETTER ODDS!”
-This is their entire argument.
We knew it when they requested this hearing. It gave them a panel of corrupt judges. It was suggested immediately.
Ms. Powell is absolutely brilliant. A Powell for Ginsburg swap on the SCOTUS would be most appropriate. She is winning a literally 9 on 1 fight.
Powell on the SC.... holy smokes its brilliant.
That slanty eyed hoe Millet is literally hissing at Powell. Fuck you nickel wh0re.
Haha, backtracking like a coward, the judge made his animosity and bias towards Flynn clear, now they're playing innocent.
As soon as they questioned Wilkinson on her part in all this - call DROPPED. Hmmmm... I hope another judge brings it up..
Bazzinga 💥 justice roberts said what ?? 😂😂 “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said in a statement. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."
"That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for."
Of course, it's like Mattis intervening in politics to say the military shouldn't intervene in politics--because Trump took a walk in the park. Roberts shows his partisan RINO ass by denying judges are partisan. Those who have the most to hide talk the loudest.
I thinking blackmailed
Yeah, strong possibility.
Hahahaha!
Finally someone focuses on the defendant's rights.
Oh, yea, that!
Yes, finally and that lawyer bitch is laughing.
Is this Rao?
Yes
I see that now. Rao is on now
Another whore that speaks with California street hooker vocal fry. Always watch for it; crazy commie women love signaling their insanity this way.
Imagine thinking any real person will take you seriously when you speak like that. Blasey Ford spoke like that, too.
This is sound advice for you unmarried pedes.
Other judges ask questions to clarify. This judge asks questions because its LIKE she doesnt get it, or what's in front of her conflicts with her worldview.
Wall layed out clearly that this shit needs to stop now and the judges aren't having it. They're trying to twist themselves into pretzels to keep this going by twisting the Foker case into something it's not.
Our Courts are in enemy hands.
HELICOPTER RIDES FOR COMMUNISTS
Fuck man, imagine how great this country could be if these corrupt communist fucks weren't in the way fudging everything up at every chance they get.
Sidney’s argument is rock solid. Sullivan has shown bias beyond doubt. How will these swamp judges rule against her....I mean we know they will...but man the Judiciary branch has totally collapsed.
The country is in desperate need of Judicial reform.
That branch of government got infected with anti-american liberalism long ago.
John Roberts is a poster child for what is wrong.
The Govt has a motion to dismiss, gives 3 reasons why, and the Judge is supposed to be able say "sorry, tell me the REAL reason"? BS
These "judges" are unbelievable. I think by and large the attorneys are smarter and better versed than the damned judges which is EXTREMELY scary.
They are now going to have hearings about this hearing, and will continue to have hearings until theres a dem in the white house.
IF A TRIAL JUDGE THINKS HE'S BEEN HOODWINKED, THEN PROSECUTE THE PROSECUTORS WHO SWORE THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS TRUE!
This x100000
Makes too much sense...
Yeah, the custodial restrictions ARE against his rights to speak, you cunt! Flynn is the lynchpin to bring down the man that appointed you!
Judges need to be incarcerated for bullshit like this.
“Yeah, okay sure”
WHAT A CUNT.
Let her finish her answer! They’re taking cues from the Democrats in the house 🙄
THESE SWAMP RATS ARE NOT USED TO PEOPLE STANDING UP TO THEIR BS!
Here's Garland's chance to prove that he would be an impartial jurist had he made it to SCOTUS and side for dismissal. But he won't, because he''s an Obama hack.
Narrator: He didn’t. He brought up a hypothetical situation about The President spending money unappropriated by Congress in an emergency (which is exactly what’s going on right now) despite him going to bat for Obama (I’ve got a pen and a phone, that’s all I need). This man is a hypocrite and a traitor.
So basically their argument is:
”WAAAAAAAAAH! JUDGE SULLIVAN WANTED TO RULE ON THE CASE FOR HEADLINES!!!”
Some commie is downvoting comments hahahahahahah