3557
Comments (1582)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
GingerMinky 16 points ago +19 / -3

So, I think there are 2 judges being political, getting their dinner party invites. Some are getting headlines, but I don't think they will allow this to continue. You and I know it would go to the SC and they would be thoroughly embarrassed. Do they want to be known for that? No.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
3
GingerMinky 3 points ago +5 / -2

This is very normal. If you read transcripts, this is how they argue. They make you defend your position.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
GingerMinky 3 points ago +3 / -0

There was some of that, but for the most part, appeals courts make you argue against your opponent, but it is done through the judges. It's different. It isn't like the court you think you are used to.

14
Trump2000 14 points ago +14 / -0

Are they just trying to delay this and drag it out until after the election? Would that work?

16
bill_in_texas 16 points ago +16 / -0

They just did. They said they will pick up this case again on December 9th....after the election. They are doing their part to keep Flynn muzzled. He can not be allowed to speak out on what he knows.

12
LatitudeofMind 12 points ago +12 / -0

Time for civil disobedience on Flynn’s part.

7
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 7 points ago +7 / -0

How did this appeal happen so quickly but the follow up be postponed until next year? Can Sidney fight to get it done this year?

2
B1ueCo11ar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed this is disgusting joke.

9
DickTick 9 points ago +10 / -1

They just did. December 9th.

2
Houdini 2 points ago +2 / -0

Activists feel no shame.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
IPMang 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends what they're getting in return for the public embarrassment