Here's Garland's chance to prove that he would be an impartial jurist had he made it to SCOTUS and side for dismissal. But he won't, because he''s an Obama hack.
Narrator: He didn’t. He brought up a hypothetical situation about The President spending money unappropriated by Congress in an emergency (which is exactly what’s going on right now) despite him going to bat for Obama (I’ve got a pen and a phone, that’s all I need). This man is a hypocrite and a traitor.
Here's Garland's chance to prove that he would be an impartial jurist had he made it to SCOTUS and side for dismissal. But he won't, because he''s an Obama hack.
Narrator: He didn’t. He brought up a hypothetical situation about The President spending money unappropriated by Congress in an emergency (which is exactly what’s going on right now) despite him going to bat for Obama (I’ve got a pen and a phone, that’s all I need). This man is a hypocrite and a traitor.