2928
Comments (85)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
252
irspow 252 points ago +255 / -3

Phone companies are ‘common carriers’ who are supposedly prohibited from censoring or even monitoring speech. Loomer has a case here.

139
IAbsolutelyDare 139 points ago +141 / -2

She's also got less than three months in which to win it.

70
hshdhhd [S] 70 points ago +72 / -2

which is exactly why lawsuits are a stupid way of dealing with the problem. but the anti-government sovereign citizen nutjobs can't handle the real solution..

lawsuits take years and massive financial backing and you still don't know the outcome. which is why we need a law against political censorship especially of elected officials and candidates..

noir would be enforced by a federal agency who doesn't need to take 3 months to 2 years in and out of court. They can investigate an issue a ruling in a matter of days if necessary. just like every other Federal agency..

if there is a case of political censorship they don't need to take years and years and years of lawsuits. They can investigate it and rule on it and issue a fine or some other punishmen

the way it's supposed to work. In a fast-moving world you can't rely on 1800s slow-moving solutionss

the saying is modern problems require MODERN solutions. not ancient solutions..

it's time to move forward.

33
OranjeBlanjeBlou 33 points ago +33 / -0

The other side is more than willing to flex the power of government against us. Us refusing to do so against them doesn’t protect us from it, it just makes sure they are the only ones with that power.

16
hshdhhd [S] 16 points ago +16 / -0

exactly. and thats what people like McConnell want. perfect comtrolled oppositionn

5
Bilbobaggins 5 points ago +5 / -0

This only ends one way

4
MerchantMan99 4 points ago +4 / -0

Federal agencies move at a glacial pace.

4
iPertinax 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who is going to staff this branch and why in the hell would I trust their judgement? This sounds like deep state waiting to happen, and abuse of power waiting to happen.

13
randomusename 13 points ago +14 / -1

She just needs an emergency injunction. She should be able to get that.

25
TrumpsFavorite 25 points ago +27 / -2

Yes but that doesn’t apply to hate speech

17
spicyfries 17 points ago +17 / -0

"It's hate speech because I hate it." - lefty logic

9
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 9 points ago +9 / -0

The supreme court has ruled there is no such thing as "hate" speech. Not gonna fly in court.

17
deleted 17 points ago +18 / -1
10
hshdhhd [S] 10 points ago +13 / -3

which is why we need fighters in government who are willing to cut corners and go after them. stop letting them do that. it's not hard to fire these people. And replace them with better people..

3
Bilbobaggins 3 points ago +3 / -0

The tree is thirsty

-4
spicyfries -4 points ago +3 / -7

OKAY DOOMER

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
RandomUzer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do not be too sure on that. Tittle I and Title II are different beasts. Cell companies and ISPs fall under Title II.