For Garland, this is a timing issue. He seems to be suggesting that a writ of mandamus should not be considered/issued until after Sullivan actually rules on the case. Sydney Powell's argument is that Sullivan has already shown his hand and therefore mandamus is appropriate. Powell also argued that Sullivan should be removed because of his obvious bias.
For Garland, this is a timing issue. He seems to be suggesting that a writ of mandamus should not be considered/issued until after Sullivan actually rules on the case. Sydney Powell's argument is that Sullivan has already shown his hand and therefore mandamus is appropriate. Powell also argued that Sullivan should be removed because of his obvious bias.
Oh I don’t think so...