831
Comments (49)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
HuggableBear 9 points ago +9 / -0

Isn't it sad, though, that we are in a place in this country where an absolute landslide due to the worst candidates since Mondale still leads to 122 electoral votes for the Dems?

Any Democrat candidate gets a 45% head start to 270 without having to do a damn thing.

4
OutcastSeal 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's definitely sad. Now all the democrats are fleeing their lawless liberal states and taking their liberal mindsets to Texas. Imagine them having the entire West Coast + Texas every election. THAT would be sad. At least at this point in time CA is always offset by TX.

2
324jl 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's worse than that though...

Maryland and Vermont are more liberal than New York. With Rhode Island being about the same as Illinois. (IL & RI more likely to flip than the other democrat strongholds)

Current order of most liberal based on 2016 election:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Presidential_Election_Results_Swing_by_State_from_2012_to_2016.svg/300px-Presidential_Election_Results_Swing_by_State_from_2012_to_2016.svg.png

Note: It's missing DC, because it would be off the chart. (Over 90% of DC voted for Clinton Corruption.) Also, Utah was skewed by a third party candidate.