Negative ads where you make claims to smear your opponent are dirty. However, simply replaying your opponent's quotes to show a consistent track record of hate (vs where the media says they stand) is a fair way to fight back.
did you read the dude's post? "However, simply replaying your opponent's quotes to show a consistent track record of hate (vs where the media says they stand) is a fair way to fight back."
Negative ads where you make claims to smear your opponent are dirty. However, simply replaying your opponent's quotes to show a consistent track record of hate (vs where the media says they stand) is a fair way to fight back.
This is an educational ad.
Is it dirty to literally let the opponent speak for himself?
no, and that's exactly what he said...."However, simply replaying your opponent's quotes..."
Absolutely not. This is Biden. Fair and Square.
did you read the dude's post? "However, simply replaying your opponent's quotes to show a consistent track record of hate (vs where the media says they stand) is a fair way to fight back."
here is another uptrump....not sure why people can't read past the word dirty in your post.