The sad thing is that the RT-PCR tests are fairly accurate because they match a specific sequence of the viral RNA.
If they're combining questionable IgG/IgM testing to pad the positive results, this is a travesty because it means nothing is trustworthy at this point. They're tossing science out with the baby and the bathwater.
Because of that and what you described, I'd imagine two outcomes: If they're just using a RT-PCR test, you'll probably turn up negative. If they're using the antibody assay, you'll probably turn up positive.
Bonus third outcome: If they need money, you'll turn up positive.
The sad thing is that the RT-PCR tests are fairly accurate because they match a specific sequence of the viral RNA.
If they're combining questionable IgG/IgM testing to pad the positive results, this is a travesty because it means nothing is trustworthy at this point. They're tossing science out with the baby and the bathwater.
Because of that and what you described, I'd imagine two outcomes: If they're just using a RT-PCR test, you'll probably turn up negative. If they're using the antibody assay, you'll probably turn up positive.
Bonus third outcome: If they need money, you'll turn up positive.