Don't forget their love of slave labor...I mean "open borders." Also everyone can do any drug, anywhere, anytime because it never has any affect on anyone else.
I was told Jo Jorgensen was the savior of our time simply because she wants to "abolish the ATF and keep the government out of our paychecks."
Then you look into her and she's pro-choice, wants open borders, doesn't want the government to do anything about tech censorship, and thinks we shouldn't tariff Chinese imports....
They're libertarians for a reason. They have like 2 good ideas and the rest fucking suck.
Libertarians are voting for the next “What is Aleppo” Johnson that’ll give them open borders and leave them to their dope farming... I’d take a classic Liberal over one of those retards any day of the week.
Far right, slight auth. The government should have a well defined boundary of influence and have the ability to do that (and that alone) well. The issue with libertarianism is that it tries to solve a problem caused by the government putting its hand in A by removing the government's hand in B.
Take marriage, for example. If the government didn't offer tax breaks for married couples with the goal of encouraging families to have children, they wouldn't have to define what a marriage in. But libertarians want to take the halfway trip of allowing the government to stick its hand into the tax aspect of marriage and also define marriage as broadly as possible, even if it defeats the original point of the government being involved entirely. Pick one and stick with it, but picking both looks two-faced.
Yes, let's let billion dollar corporations that definitely have their own agenda to push have total control over the cultural dialogue. Surely nothing bad could come of that.
Man it's weird I'm a libertarian at heart but I can't stand this type of shit.
I guess I prefer if the government stays out if private business but at the same time I would like to see those private businesses enforce their rules equally.
So like they censor trump campaign for "covid misinformation" but the CCP can spew whatever fake ass shit they want.
It's time to bring back the Sedition Act of 1798. "Private businesses", aka CNN, NBC and the rest of the fake news industry, destroyed our country by falsely reporting about George Floyd.
Is anybody ever going to do anything about big tech censorship?
One of, if not the, biggest issue of our time.
Strongly worded letters...soon.
Lindsey, is that you?
Oh, fuck
I hear they're also planning some extreme hand-wringing and "hrrrumph"-ing.
They've all blocked joebiden.info for months on all those platforms in private messaging, people are just picking up on this now?
Yep. LIBERTARIANS would see this country burn because “MUH Private Industreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!”
Edit: LMFAO @ Butthurt LIBertarians downvoting!
Don't forget their love of slave labor...I mean "open borders." Also everyone can do any drug, anywhere, anytime because it never has any affect on anyone else.
A true libertarian would know that infringing on other people's right to freedom of speech is wrong.
You shouldn't be forced to make anyone a cake, and you also shouldn't enjoy the protections that section 230 provides while censoring your users.
source: a non-butt-hurt libertarian
I was told Jo Jorgensen was the savior of our time simply because she wants to "abolish the ATF and keep the government out of our paychecks."
Then you look into her and she's pro-choice, wants open borders, doesn't want the government to do anything about tech censorship, and thinks we shouldn't tariff Chinese imports....
They're libertarians for a reason. They have like 2 good ideas and the rest fucking suck.
Libertarians are voting for trump stop dividing people
Libertarians are voting for the next “What is Aleppo” Johnson that’ll give them open borders and leave them to their dope farming... I’d take a classic Liberal over one of those retards any day of the week.
We need more glorious faggot energy.
Far right, slight auth. The government should have a well defined boundary of influence and have the ability to do that (and that alone) well. The issue with libertarianism is that it tries to solve a problem caused by the government putting its hand in A by removing the government's hand in B.
Take marriage, for example. If the government didn't offer tax breaks for married couples with the goal of encouraging families to have children, they wouldn't have to define what a marriage in. But libertarians want to take the halfway trip of allowing the government to stick its hand into the tax aspect of marriage and also define marriage as broadly as possible, even if it defeats the original point of the government being involved entirely. Pick one and stick with it, but picking both looks two-faced.
I posted a screenshot on here yesterday of some bots spamming that on reddit https://thedonald.win/p/GcCJfvgx/freedom-of-speech-is-under-attac/
Yes, let's let billion dollar corporations that definitely have their own agenda to push have total control over the cultural dialogue. Surely nothing bad could come of that.
Man it's weird I'm a libertarian at heart but I can't stand this type of shit.
I guess I prefer if the government stays out if private business but at the same time I would like to see those private businesses enforce their rules equally.
So like they censor trump campaign for "covid misinformation" but the CCP can spew whatever fake ass shit they want.
That is my issue.
Enforcement should be equal.
It's time to bring back the Sedition Act of 1798. "Private businesses", aka CNN, NBC and the rest of the fake news industry, destroyed our country by falsely reporting about George Floyd.
I thought Ajit Pai would have done something, but he ain't done shit but thumb his asshole while drinking out of giant reeses pieces mug.
Yep I'm shocked he hasn't done a damn thing. I actually thought he would be worth a little bit of a fuck.
Pretty sure Trump signed an EO to get the ball rolling on that recently.
That combined with the mainstream media which is 93% Democrat owned