This seems misleading, what I read earlier seemed to be saying that one or more of the other Rs on this committee aren't willing to vote for subpoenas, but Johnson wouldn't name them. Maybe we shouldn't assume it's all of them.
You ever heard of a conspiracy of silence? You know how a snobby club works when they are voting on new members and there's a candidate nobody really objects to but nobody really likes? Nobody has to actively say anything. They just have to withhold their nod and the thing fails by acquiesence. The more political the organization, like the Senate, the more gets done by withholding and prevarication. They always have to keep their options open and being too vociferous or dogmatic gets them labeled and categorized, and it gives their enemies something to quote to use against them in the future. No. All these RINOs have to do is be squishy or silent and the coup succeeds.
I agree, so we should call them out for not calling out their colleagues. That's not how this post (OP) reads to me. Personally I think Rand's legit even if a lot of this forum dislikes him, and Hawley at least acts like he has testicles, but we should hold them all accountable.
There are a few stout names on that list. Could it be that by calling that group of witnesses might cross into an ongoing investigation? If this has been ruled out let it be known.
At this point so close to the election, after almost 4 years, I think we can reliably interpret their foot-dragging and near silence as to what they are - theater of backstabbers and co-conspirators. Had high hopes for Hawley. Now, not so much.
The revolution draws nigh. These faggots need to hang . Which ever ones are the opposers. 99% sure one is the faggot Lankford. He stabbed the Okies in the back. The little youth minister got up there and got full of that power now he thinks he’s some cock daddy. Mitts of Mormon goes without saying. These pricks work for us we need to know the damn truth I know who the obstructionists are.
I mean cuck boy Romney I understand, but what the fuck is the deal with Scott, Paul and Hawley.
I live in FL - going to contact Scott’s office about this for sure.
I'm giving Paul the benefit of the doubt. Usually when he goes against the grain, he has a reason to do so.
He didnt hold it up
That’s just the list on the committee. Hawley surely isn’t one of the holdouts.
let us know their reply if you could please, thank you.
Will do
Ron Johnson indicated one Republican dissenter is enough to prevent him from issuing subpoenas.
And we all know who that is.
Pierre Delecto.
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/about
Senator Ron Johnson, WI http://ronjohnson.senate.gov
Senator Rob Portman, OH http://portman.senate.gov
Senator Rand Paul, KY http://paul.senate.gov
Senator James Lankford, OK http://www.lankford.senate.gov
Senator Mitt Romney, UT https://romney.senate.gov
Senator Rick Scott, FL https://rickscott.senate.gov
Senator Michael B. Enzi, WY http://enzi.senate.gov
Senator Josh Hawley, MO https://hawley.senate.gov
I don't think he meant all of them opposed. Congress is useless against criminals, the prosecutors will get them or our country is going to collapse.
Yeah he did not say that none of them would. They should all be contacted, but don't break out the pitchforks just yet.
This seems misleading, what I read earlier seemed to be saying that one or more of the other Rs on this committee aren't willing to vote for subpoenas, but Johnson wouldn't name them. Maybe we shouldn't assume it's all of them.
You ever heard of a conspiracy of silence? You know how a snobby club works when they are voting on new members and there's a candidate nobody really objects to but nobody really likes? Nobody has to actively say anything. They just have to withhold their nod and the thing fails by acquiesence. The more political the organization, like the Senate, the more gets done by withholding and prevarication. They always have to keep their options open and being too vociferous or dogmatic gets them labeled and categorized, and it gives their enemies something to quote to use against them in the future. No. All these RINOs have to do is be squishy or silent and the coup succeeds.
I agree, so we should call them out for not calling out their colleagues. That's not how this post (OP) reads to me. Personally I think Rand's legit even if a lot of this forum dislikes him, and Hawley at least acts like he has testicles, but we should hold them all accountable.
I should add that includes Johnson for not naming names.
Ah, blackballing pledges...
Looks like I have a call to make tomorrow to mt Senator.
Surprised and disappointed with Hawley..
I doubt Hawley is one of the hold outs. I would bet Mittens Romney is one tho.
There are a few stout names on that list. Could it be that by calling that group of witnesses might cross into an ongoing investigation? If this has been ruled out let it be known.
At this point so close to the election, after almost 4 years, I think we can reliably interpret their foot-dragging and near silence as to what they are - theater of backstabbers and co-conspirators. Had high hopes for Hawley. Now, not so much.
Fuck those faggots
What the fuck Rick Scott?!
Mods, please sticky this. We need at least 5000 people calling tomorrow
Yes, please.
I'm sure its only one of two of these guys (@Mitt Romney)
The revolution draws nigh. These faggots need to hang . Which ever ones are the opposers. 99% sure one is the faggot Lankford. He stabbed the Okies in the back. The little youth minister got up there and got full of that power now he thinks he’s some cock daddy. Mitts of Mormon goes without saying. These pricks work for us we need to know the damn truth I know who the obstructionists are.
Hayley makes no sense to me.
Say it's not so... randlet???
Rand Paul? Really?
HAWLEY?!?
Portman and Romney are the 2 for sure.
The fuck wrong with Rand Paul. He is so consistantly inconsistant
Of course Portman's on the list. What a useless cuck.