10
posted ago by AussieSasquatch76 ago by AussieSasquatch76 +10 / -0

My understanding is that she is an anchor baby. Her parents were not citizens when she was born. Is that actually true? Does that DQ her from holding the presidency?

Comments (6)
sorted by:
2
Recusant_Apparatchik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, anchor babies are considered natural born citizens due to the current prevailing interpretation of the 14th Amendment, regardless of the status of the parents.

It's part of how the whole anchor baby exploit works. Since the child is a citizen, the parents are then relatives of a citizen and have an easier time obtaining legal immigration status.

2
AussieSasquatch76 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for clarifying that

2
highenergywinning 2 points ago +2 / -0

Technically no but that wont stop the left. They let a nigerian be president for 8 yrs

1
AussieSasquatch76 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surely it wouldn’t hold up in court though?

1
highenergywinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would never go to court just like obamas lie

1
TheOutlawPepeWales 1 point ago +1 / -0

It depends on whether the Constitution is being interpreted by an originalist or a libtard activist.