163
Comments (38)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
kag-2020- 2 points ago +2 / -0

Her parents were foriegners who abused our laws. No different than Barry Soweto only his parents were even less competent. The people who set those laws should have been hung for treason but the foreign allegiance within our government was too strong.

1
Cdogger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its derived from English common law, which is where the entire American legal tradition comes from. You don't know what you're talking about. US v Wong Kim Ark 1898. I think there's pretty strong arguments that this ruling would not apply to illegal aliens (the justices specifically point out that Wong Kim Arks parents were in the country legally, engaged in legitimate business and aside from a handful of family visits had no ties to the Empire of China) but it's very much in the American tradition that children of resident aliens are citizens. The only reason it was even a question in this case was because Chinese nationals were explicitly barred from becoming citizens.

1
kag-2020- 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't know what you're talking about.

Yea I do! Go look up the history of the 14th Amendment, lmfao! You Shillbots don't deserve to be called retarded.

1
Cdogger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, the 14th was to address the legal status of emancipated slaves. Hint: birthright citizenship existed before that. You can squeal about me being a shill all you want you still don't know what you're talking about.

Harris is a shit candidate with a ton of baggage and no ability to be elected outside of california. Trying to "attack" her with retarded bullshit about her citizenship is a waste of time and energy

1
kag-2020- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Context matters Shillbot! Under what context was it passed? Go read, lmfao!