Even as late as the 1950s and 60s, the community would come together to "correct" the judge.
They would also "correct" the ex-wife (who is not even the boy's biological mother).
People would be hanging from fucking trees.
Child abuse would stop REAL fucking quick if we still had our community support systems in place.
Instead, conservatives forgot a very basic lesson in the last generation or two: Liberty is never won "once and for all". It has to be fought for every generation.
Our grandparents knew this. As did our great-grandparents. And THEIR great-grandparents.
As the social fabric broke down (under "diversity" and the purposeful "deconstruction of American identity") our communities and civic organizations dissolved. We outsourced our responsibility to bureaucracies, assuming that they would always be under conservative control. It never occurred to us that these institutions would be weaponized against us.
Any institution that serves AGAINST the interests of the people has violated the "consent of the governed" precept and is illegitimate, and, as Jefferson said, MUST be removed.
John Stuart Mill warned against passivity in "Considerations On Representative Government". He said that a republic requires an active populace, whereas all a tyranny demands is that people be passive and obedient.
He said that in authoritarian states, people will see a mugging on the street and look the other way, saying, "It's not MY job to stop it. It's the police's job!"
In a republic, by contrast, the citizen is called to stop the evil. It's why places like America had citizen's arrest.
Quote: "Again, a people must be considered unfit for more than a limited and qualified freedom who will not co-operate actively with the law and the public authorities in the repression of evil-doers. A people who are more disposed to shelter a criminal than to apprehend him; who, like the Hindoos, will perjure themselves to screen the man who has robbed them, rather than take trouble or expose themselves to vindictiveness by giving evidence against him; who, like some nations of Europe down to a recent date, if a man mugs another in the public street, pass by on the other side, because it is the business of the police to look to the matter, and it is safer not to interfere in what does not concern them—require that the public authorities should be armed with much sterner powers of repression than elsewhere, since the first indispensable requisites of civilized life have nothing else to rest on."
Perhaps a man should seek a sister of a male friend. Perhaps few women want to face an angry brother.
Yes, it is a problem.
It might be made worse by all this insisting on a woman with some college. A good high school education, good language, good habits, and a curious mind, might be better. Even better if she has seen what the job prospects really are, in real life, of non-STEM college and grad school women.
A home-maker life might be better, she might reason. And nobody says she can't read and study just because it makes life interesting.
But the men want that salary. Hers. Some of them want prestige from her education. Some of them want her to be so thin and cute that ... she can have anybody and, uh, does.
A not-so-educated, not-gorgeous, honest type with some personal energy, curiosity, goodness, patience, and at least one brother her husband knows a long time, might be a candidate.
I know a woman in Austin. A gang member came into her home assaulted her and stole from her. She felt sorry for him. Those sort of people wont turn red.
Have some kids is good advice but not a solution. The demographic time bomb of 0-17 year olds is already here, and even if every republican managed to crank out 5 kids by 40 we'd still be losing the demographic war to the third worlders.
Yes having kids is awesome, but our future on the r/K scale is 100% on the K plan.
But the idea of "increased parental investment" with r strategy has a flattened curve. The parents are not such geniuses that their investment means all that much anyway. Beyond food, clothing, a hug, and a small number of non-negotiable rules, their input means only so much. If they stay together.
If they stay together.
If they stay together.
Now that education is being restructured and college is no longer seen as the great, golden, shining good it once was... you don't have to limit childbearing to the number of college educations you can provide.
Both R and K strategies have their vices and virtues.
I think you are seeing that K is not always the way to bet, indeed your own words seem to hint at that if I understand you correctly.
The lurking villain is the man's wanting his wife's salary, to make life more comfortable.
R maybe be beating the snot out of K.
R doesn't need luxuries; his idea of fun is yet another child. He doesn't need other toys. Half his children are useful because they are male. And the other half help with the younger children, so he's good all the way around. He can't lose.
Bad laws? Who passed them? Humans. You don't have enough humans.
There is only one source of numerous humans, and it isn't a woman with a good job.
In humans, it has come to mean, do you want eight children who live lean and start life lean, share clothes and toys, may not go to college, because we can't afford it?
Or, do you want one or two children who have life's advantages, have fun, and don't have those pressures of having to share, and who do go to college?
K has been the way of the Western world since the end of WW II. It seemed to work nicely for several generations, but it has produced problems too.
R has been the way of the East and the South since forever. It is the human norm. K was the innovative and unprecedented thing.
K has led to fewer Westerners being around, and the sheer numbers of the
non-Western has meant that they increasingly get their way. And why not. Of course. If you don't show up, well where are you? Non-existent people can't vote.
Another thing that happened that wasn't expected was the diminished prestige of the woman who was home raising kids, and a lot of kids. Gradually, "I'm just a housewife," led to "OMG you are NOT having a kid NOW," and "she just pumps them out. She's a breeder."
NOBODY would have used such nauseatingly disrespectful language about a mother or motherhood before 1950.
The "baby boomers" resulted from a burst of enthusiasm for life and love for peace, home, children, after the horrors of WW II.
But the boomers' parents were having two, or three, or maaaaybe four kids. Only one kid was considered weird. "Only children are always spoiled. You need two," was the thinking. But more than two? No. Let's buy a house and have plenty.
The women were thinking differently.
The ads showed them in pearls and heels, pushing vacuums instead of pushing a broom. New appliances were making things sparklier and easier. But they were still home.
In the late Sixties, the untenable paradox of being home but not having that many kids, and therefore having empty days, exploded in the Women's Movement and the women left the home.
Then the home lost its anchor and the divorces happened.
The children of those divorces are today's parents or non-parents.
Their kids, the Antifas, know their futures have been looted, meaning, marriage was destroyed. That is why they crave belonging, and of course the colleges have become horrible places. Whatever humanity they arrived with was expunged by their Residential Advisor in the Freshman Year Experience program, which is national. Leftism, blah blah.
So that's R versus K.
Every problem you see today can be traced to simply not having enough children in the past.
I would also add that the dichotomy of "have kids / or have plenty" is a false dichotomy brought about by two factors:
The destruction of the value of labour by the doubling of the labour force due to the influence of Feminism and women's lib.
The ever increasing burden of taxation on otherwise prosperous and productive middle and even lower-class earners.
These two things together have destroyed the ability of the Western family to have 3+ children and still enjoy a generally prosperous lifestyle of plenty. Real Productivity has increased by an insane amount in the West over the last 100 years; and yet, the middle class has largely not seen great benefits from it, because as Productivity has increased, so has the loss to taxation by the State.
Do you think religion could help with that? I know it's not magic.
I also think men say yes too much to unvetted women who look nice enough. The men don't hold out enough, do enough background checking, handwriting analysis, body language analysis, and just plain waiting. You can't know how someone handles frustration if you rush to amuse them. Time has to pass. And all that vetting and pondering might be done by a professional matchmaker. The bias would be, "you are only seeing one of my men if I think you are the Right Sort, ma'am." Not the other way around. Matchmakers should come back.
I get so sick of the “Texas is the land of freedom” crowd. They’re the same ones who like to say “well it’s only Dallas, and Austin, and SA, and... well no shit, everything else is damn desert. Y’all don’t even have constitutional carry and somehow Texas is supposed to be the bastion of American Spirit? Bullshit. Maybe I’m just a salty southerner but the arrogance is laughable these days.
The entire southern culture is that way. We are nice and welcoming people but now the welcome has worn off. We see them for what they are and will always be. Damned Yankees.
I'm sorry, but this man needs to take his son, and flee to a non extradition country. They have a doozy of an asylum claim to make. Other than some of the more woke European countries, who would NOT give sanctuary to this poor kid and his dad?
This is fucked up, and of course, I had to get the update on this here, not on the news sites IN TEXAS. Bullshit.
I’ve been Texan all my life. I fly an American and Texan flag everyday. I love my country and state but our cities are being taken over by Communist Democrats thanks to large influxes from blue states and open borders. Our schools have become Marxist indoctrination centers. Cities are filled with corrupt Soros backed shills. TX is 90% red by land area but that 10% fell for the propaganda, lies and votes like they are told to. I fear the Marxist may get the very thing they seek but the consequences will be far worse than ever imagined. People should vote for freedom, personal responsibility and opportunity. I served 10 years to defend our country against Communism. The voters betrayed me and voted them into office. Then sports decided to disrespect my service too by kneeling for the National Anthem.
Well, it's time to kill the wife. Honestly, if this was me, I'd off the bitch. There's no way you'll have access to your sons again under normal circumstances and the kids would have a better shot with another woman.
Let’s go fellow Texans. I volunteer with y’all to be security for this dad and child. You want to fuck this child over? Come pry the weapons out of our hands first. Good luck faggot fucks.
Texan here, the left is trying to turn Texas blue and have been trying for years. Houston has had only 3 Republican mayors in the last 100 years. And no Republican for the last 39 years.
He's a still a boy. So they are going to pump him with hormones to make sure his balls and penis stay tiny.
If this boy becomes a man and decides he never wanted to be a girl and it was his mother that did this to him, his dick will remain the size it was at 8
The boy has said he doesn’t want to be a girl and the dad has said he only wants to dress in boy clothes when he’s with him. It’s 100% the mother, munchausen by proxy.
Worst thing ive ever seen happen to a man. This is true evil. Not only do they abuse his child but to make the man pay for it... jesus.
I wouldn't blame him for picking up a gun tbh.
Regrettably, we will likely hear how this man killed his ex-wife, then his son, then himself. Hopefully he does the judge before the rest, but can't count on it.
They need to be put against the wall. We don't need a world war for that, we just need to find our nerve and use the tools the Framers gave us to protect our republic.
Any lawyers on here can explain to a simpleton like me how this is possible? What are the next steps here and can the father appeal? This is clearly abuse and if I recall correctly, that cunt is not even the boy’s biological mother.
Texans are being replaced by californians that bring their bullshit libertarded woketard (D)communist ass politics with them, while trying to get away from the same bullshit they voted in.
People need to take responsibility for their actions. The father was willing to overlook the fact that the mother had a few marbles missing when he stuck his dick in her. Becoming a cuck who is forced to pay for his sons transgender procedure is the consequence.
Texas is just like the military these days. Everyone thinks it’s still reliably conservative but it’s not. This Alice In Wonderland socialist/communist thinking is everywhere.
Giving puberty blockers to children is a Mengele-tier abomination. Ever doctor and every parent that engages is this shit should be thrown in prison for performing medical experimentation on children.
Don't pay it. Also sue the judge. (Okay, I know that last one probably can't happen.)
At the very least say you refuse to pay it out of religious beliefs. They cannot compel you to do so, and if they attempt to, get a loyal, strap in and be ready for the long haul to justice. Take names every filthy judge and prosecutor that opposed you along the way, and when you win, write their names on a giant sign proclaiming their willing and complicit attack on the 1st-Amendments rights of freedom of religion.
Being ordered to pay for your own son’s abuse. That way crosses the line
This might be the evilest story in the world rn. Can’t believe it doesn’t have more attention
Yes
This some John Q shit right here
I can’t disagree at all. They all deserve it
Even as late as the 1950s and 60s, the community would come together to "correct" the judge.
They would also "correct" the ex-wife (who is not even the boy's biological mother).
People would be hanging from fucking trees.
Child abuse would stop REAL fucking quick if we still had our community support systems in place.
Instead, conservatives forgot a very basic lesson in the last generation or two: Liberty is never won "once and for all". It has to be fought for every generation.
Our grandparents knew this. As did our great-grandparents. And THEIR great-grandparents.
As the social fabric broke down (under "diversity" and the purposeful "deconstruction of American identity") our communities and civic organizations dissolved. We outsourced our responsibility to bureaucracies, assuming that they would always be under conservative control. It never occurred to us that these institutions would be weaponized against us.
Any institution that serves AGAINST the interests of the people has violated the "consent of the governed" precept and is illegitimate, and, as Jefferson said, MUST be removed.
John Stuart Mill warned against passivity in "Considerations On Representative Government". He said that a republic requires an active populace, whereas all a tyranny demands is that people be passive and obedient.
He said that in authoritarian states, people will see a mugging on the street and look the other way, saying, "It's not MY job to stop it. It's the police's job!"
In a republic, by contrast, the citizen is called to stop the evil. It's why places like America had citizen's arrest.
Quote: "Again, a people must be considered unfit for more than a limited and qualified freedom who will not co-operate actively with the law and the public authorities in the repression of evil-doers. A people who are more disposed to shelter a criminal than to apprehend him; who, like the Hindoos, will perjure themselves to screen the man who has robbed them, rather than take trouble or expose themselves to vindictiveness by giving evidence against him; who, like some nations of Europe down to a recent date, if a man mugs another in the public street, pass by on the other side, because it is the business of the police to look to the matter, and it is safer not to interfere in what does not concern them—require that the public authorities should be armed with much sterner powers of repression than elsewhere, since the first indispensable requisites of civilized life have nothing else to rest on."
That's some serious Kafka shit. What a nightmare.
I think I'd rather get rid of everything I own and quit my job. I'd rather be penniless and homeless than pay for someone to fuck up my son.
Same. She is no mother, she is a Demon. Sad.
Another problem is the median age.
Have some kids.
Laws are passed by humans.
If you and all your relatives and friends had twice their number of children, those laws would not have passed.
Yes.
Perhaps a man should seek a sister of a male friend. Perhaps few women want to face an angry brother.
Yes, it is a problem.
It might be made worse by all this insisting on a woman with some college. A good high school education, good language, good habits, and a curious mind, might be better. Even better if she has seen what the job prospects really are, in real life, of non-STEM college and grad school women.
A home-maker life might be better, she might reason. And nobody says she can't read and study just because it makes life interesting.
But the men want that salary. Hers. Some of them want prestige from her education. Some of them want her to be so thin and cute that ... she can have anybody and, uh, does.
A not-so-educated, not-gorgeous, honest type with some personal energy, curiosity, goodness, patience, and at least one brother her husband knows a long time, might be a candidate.
No sorry, that doesn't work. I've tried. They get corrupt anyway.
LOL
Someone finally says it.
Bingo!!
I know a woman in Austin. A gang member came into her home assaulted her and stole from her. She felt sorry for him. Those sort of people wont turn red.
Have some kids is good advice but not a solution. The demographic time bomb of 0-17 year olds is already here, and even if every republican managed to crank out 5 kids by 40 we'd still be losing the demographic war to the third worlders.
Yes having kids is awesome, but our future on the r/K scale is 100% on the K plan.
I hear that.
But the idea of "increased parental investment" with r strategy has a flattened curve. The parents are not such geniuses that their investment means all that much anyway. Beyond food, clothing, a hug, and a small number of non-negotiable rules, their input means only so much. If they stay together.
If they stay together.
If they stay together.
Now that education is being restructured and college is no longer seen as the great, golden, shining good it once was... you don't have to limit childbearing to the number of college educations you can provide.
Both R and K strategies have their vices and virtues.
I think you are seeing that K is not always the way to bet, indeed your own words seem to hint at that if I understand you correctly.
The lurking villain is the man's wanting his wife's salary, to make life more comfortable.
R maybe be beating the snot out of K.
R doesn't need luxuries; his idea of fun is yet another child. He doesn't need other toys. Half his children are useful because they are male. And the other half help with the younger children, so he's good all the way around. He can't lose.
Bad laws? Who passed them? Humans. You don't have enough humans.
There is only one source of numerous humans, and it isn't a woman with a good job.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory
In humans, it has come to mean, do you want eight children who live lean and start life lean, share clothes and toys, may not go to college, because we can't afford it?
Or, do you want one or two children who have life's advantages, have fun, and don't have those pressures of having to share, and who do go to college?
K has been the way of the Western world since the end of WW II. It seemed to work nicely for several generations, but it has produced problems too.
R has been the way of the East and the South since forever. It is the human norm. K was the innovative and unprecedented thing.
K has led to fewer Westerners being around, and the sheer numbers of the non-Western has meant that they increasingly get their way. And why not. Of course. If you don't show up, well where are you? Non-existent people can't vote.
Another thing that happened that wasn't expected was the diminished prestige of the woman who was home raising kids, and a lot of kids. Gradually, "I'm just a housewife," led to "OMG you are NOT having a kid NOW," and "she just pumps them out. She's a breeder."
NOBODY would have used such nauseatingly disrespectful language about a mother or motherhood before 1950.
The "baby boomers" resulted from a burst of enthusiasm for life and love for peace, home, children, after the horrors of WW II.
But the boomers' parents were having two, or three, or maaaaybe four kids. Only one kid was considered weird. "Only children are always spoiled. You need two," was the thinking. But more than two? No. Let's buy a house and have plenty.
The women were thinking differently.
The ads showed them in pearls and heels, pushing vacuums instead of pushing a broom. New appliances were making things sparklier and easier. But they were still home.
In the late Sixties, the untenable paradox of being home but not having that many kids, and therefore having empty days, exploded in the Women's Movement and the women left the home.
Then the home lost its anchor and the divorces happened.
The children of those divorces are today's parents or non-parents.
Their kids, the Antifas, know their futures have been looted, meaning, marriage was destroyed. That is why they crave belonging, and of course the colleges have become horrible places. Whatever humanity they arrived with was expunged by their Residential Advisor in the Freshman Year Experience program, which is national. Leftism, blah blah.
So that's R versus K.
Every problem you see today can be traced to simply not having enough children in the past.
Is it too late to catch up? Not quite.
This is an excellent and cogent analysis.
I would also add that the dichotomy of "have kids / or have plenty" is a false dichotomy brought about by two factors:
The destruction of the value of labour by the doubling of the labour force due to the influence of Feminism and women's lib.
The ever increasing burden of taxation on otherwise prosperous and productive middle and even lower-class earners.
These two things together have destroyed the ability of the Western family to have 3+ children and still enjoy a generally prosperous lifestyle of plenty. Real Productivity has increased by an insane amount in the West over the last 100 years; and yet, the middle class has largely not seen great benefits from it, because as Productivity has increased, so has the loss to taxation by the State.
TIL - Thanks for the writeup. Very informative
Thank you for this take
You first! Today's women are garbage and bring this hellscape upon you.
Case in point, Tomi Lauren, every conservative's dream date until her latest rant.
Do you think religion could help with that? I know it's not magic.
I also think men say yes too much to unvetted women who look nice enough. The men don't hold out enough, do enough background checking, handwriting analysis, body language analysis, and just plain waiting. You can't know how someone handles frustration if you rush to amuse them. Time has to pass. And all that vetting and pondering might be done by a professional matchmaker. The bias would be, "you are only seeing one of my men if I think you are the Right Sort, ma'am." Not the other way around. Matchmakers should come back.
But yes there are huge problems.
Damn, I wish I lived in whatever fantasy world you live in.
Same guy. Unrestrained activist judges with too much power.
Judges need to start dying in the streets.
You're right.
I get so sick of the “Texas is the land of freedom” crowd. They’re the same ones who like to say “well it’s only Dallas, and Austin, and SA, and... well no shit, everything else is damn desert. Y’all don’t even have constitutional carry and somehow Texas is supposed to be the bastion of American Spirit? Bullshit. Maybe I’m just a salty southerner but the arrogance is laughable these days.
The entire southern culture is that way. We are nice and welcoming people but now the welcome has worn off. We see them for what they are and will always be. Damned Yankees.
Illinois south of I80 is good people
Hell, my wife had a friend from Michigan who Y’alled with the best of em.
Cultural appropriation!
Dont forget the overuse of the word "folks".
The bickering and inaction drives me crazy.
Indiana is better than Texas now, in every way
Fight me
Have you seen what's happening in Indianapolis? And the N/W corner is slowly turning blue.
yes but Austin and Houston would like to have a word....
I'm sorry, but this man needs to take his son, and flee to a non extradition country. They have a doozy of an asylum claim to make. Other than some of the more woke European countries, who would NOT give sanctuary to this poor kid and his dad?
This is fucked up, and of course, I had to get the update on this here, not on the news sites IN TEXAS. Bullshit.
Didn't tom hanks just do that? Where did he go?
Greece, but US has an extradition treaty with Greece
Russia. It must be Russia
This is TEXAS and that's possible.
I'll take the jail time. And write the governor for a pardon.
Sounds like its time for a Killdozer.
Judge should be held accountable for that poor kids future suicide
50 caliber seems like a reasonable answer.
Even better then.
Russia will open its doors to this boy and his father
I'd rather die. The court would have to send a death squad after me before I agreed to that.
Would have killed the ex wife mooooonths ago
Better for CPS to get a hold of the kid at this point and spend the rest of your life in prison knowing you got them out of the hands of a monster.
CPS has been supporting the transition.
Well hate to say it but the only way out of this mess is a life on the run.
And the judge.
Absolutely sickening. He needs to be in open defiance, take his son out of state and go off grid for a while.
This guy is gonna flip out, I guarantee it
Wouldn't you? I would.
The judges head belongs on a stick
This is how Killdozers are born.
Looks like those Californians have arrived. GO BACK TO YOUR DEMOCRAT UTOPIA, YOU FUCKING LIBTARDS!!!!!!!
I’ve been Texan all my life. I fly an American and Texan flag everyday. I love my country and state but our cities are being taken over by Communist Democrats thanks to large influxes from blue states and open borders. Our schools have become Marxist indoctrination centers. Cities are filled with corrupt Soros backed shills. TX is 90% red by land area but that 10% fell for the propaganda, lies and votes like they are told to. I fear the Marxist may get the very thing they seek but the consequences will be far worse than ever imagined. People should vote for freedom, personal responsibility and opportunity. I served 10 years to defend our country against Communism. The voters betrayed me and voted them into office. Then sports decided to disrespect my service too by kneeling for the National Anthem.
Stop watching all sports. Its very easy to do.
Kill the ex-wife, problem solved. Also "Sorry I lost my bitcoin in an unfortunate boating accident."
Well, it's time to kill the wife. Honestly, if this was me, I'd off the bitch. There's no way you'll have access to your sons again under normal circumstances and the kids would have a better shot with another woman.
Let’s go fellow Texans. I volunteer with y’all to be security for this dad and child. You want to fuck this child over? Come pry the weapons out of our hands first. Good luck faggot fucks.
Imagine still thinking Satanism doesn't exist
I would never pay a single dime and would be willing to go to jail for my son!
Take the kid and flee. Hide.
The difference is, flyover country is huge in TEXAS. The cities, as big as they are, haven't changed the culture outside or even as much in suburbia.
How's that working for Illinois and California?
This. 😢😢😢
Dallas is full of 'hood rats
Hood rats, white liberals and their dim witted cousins from the third world, seeking a green card
The Californians are slowly fucking your state over. Next you'll have state income tax. Mark my fucking words.
Texan here, the left is trying to turn Texas blue and have been trying for years. Houston has had only 3 Republican mayors in the last 100 years. And no Republican for the last 39 years.
I would sooner go to jail, or kidnap my son and flee for the hills.
Don't forget to mention that the "healed" orifice will smell like literal feces. Forever.
He's a still a boy. So they are going to pump him with hormones to make sure his balls and penis stay tiny.
If this boy becomes a man and decides he never wanted to be a girl and it was his mother that did this to him, his dick will remain the size it was at 8
The boy has said he doesn’t want to be a girl and the dad has said he only wants to dress in boy clothes when he’s with him. It’s 100% the mother, munchausen by proxy.
😱
This is bigger than this case. It’s going to set precedent for many more to come as well as help create legislation.
This is a Roe v. Wade. It needs to be blasted across every screen, website, radio channel, etc. Tucker needs to pick this up.
This needs to be on Tucker
Child abuse
I thought this case ended forever ago, we won it. I remember that.
Until even judges can hang, there will be no true justice.
Forget the fucking SCOTUS
Flee with the son to Russia.
Or fuck it, go out with guns blazin!
Worst thing ive ever seen happen to a man. This is true evil. Not only do they abuse his child but to make the man pay for it... jesus. I wouldn't blame him for picking up a gun tbh.
https://www.revolver.news/2020/08/james-georgulas-transition-new-ruling/
Regrettably, we will likely hear how this man killed his ex-wife, then his son, then himself. Hopefully he does the judge before the rest, but can't count on it.
Kill the wife or he should leave the state with his son. There are no other choices.
Add this as yet another reason why i'll never want to get married or have kids in this clown world.
They need to be put against the wall. We don't need a world war for that, we just need to find our nerve and use the tools the Framers gave us to protect our republic.
Withdraw all your cash and burn all your money.
Last I heard, months ago, the father was victorious. WTF happened?
Any lawyers on here can explain to a simpleton like me how this is possible? What are the next steps here and can the father appeal? This is clearly abuse and if I recall correctly, that cunt is not even the boy’s biological mother.
So in this case. I hate to say it but where could he go to save his child? Mexico? Switzerland? Japan?
Id leave the US rather than pay fuck that. Steal the kid, get to Brazil or somewhere.
Texans are being replaced by californians that bring their bullshit libertarded woketard (D)communist ass politics with them, while trying to get away from the same bullshit they voted in.
I don't feel bad for the dad. He should know not to stick his dick in a liberal.
Fuck off Antifa! Go back to reddit!
People need to take responsibility for their actions. The father was willing to overlook the fact that the mother had a few marbles missing when he stuck his dick in her. Becoming a cuck who is forced to pay for his sons transgender procedure is the consequence.
Texas is just like the military these days. Everyone thinks it’s still reliably conservative but it’s not. This Alice In Wonderland socialist/communist thinking is everywhere.
I would go John Wick on some motherfuckers.
Giving puberty blockers to children is a Mengele-tier abomination. Ever doctor and every parent that engages is this shit should be thrown in prison for performing medical experimentation on children.
Don't pay it. Also sue the judge. (Okay, I know that last one probably can't happen.)
At the very least say you refuse to pay it out of religious beliefs. They cannot compel you to do so, and if they attempt to, get a loyal, strap in and be ready for the long haul to justice. Take names every filthy judge and prosecutor that opposed you along the way, and when you win, write their names on a giant sign proclaiming their willing and complicit attack on the 1st-Amendments rights of freedom of religion.