4003
Comments (170)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
245
deleted 245 points ago +245 / -0
44
preferredfault 44 points ago +45 / -1

That's what makes it soo bad. Kamala doesn't even have children of her own, and likely never will, considering she's 55 years old. That disconnects her even more from regular people. And it also makes her even more doubled down on her political aspirations, because she's devoted all of her time to elevating herself. She's effectively her own baby.

She may have step children, but that's not a commitment, it's something she can easily walk away from without any retained responsibility or care for their future. And that kind of reality about a person, influences their whole lifetime and world perspective. When you have people soo untethered to things like their own children's future, never having to actually need to be selfless, their priorities and whole perspective of the world is distorted and out of step with the average person. This is why she had no problem with locking up homeless parents and even laughing about it. Although it's not as evil as Hillary getting a child rapist off the hook and laughing about it, it's cut from the same cloth of vile hagitude.

I would say the real distinction between Kamala and Hillary, is that Hillary just had more chances to be a huge cunt and abuse power because she was in the position to do so. But give Kamala the power of the presidential office, and she will do many terrible things that will negatively affect far more people than Hillary ever could.

3
Shortcakemylove 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is also the problem with many European leaders.