How does the Non Aggression Principle apply to things like vaccines or mask mandates? Things where leftists twist the NAP to suggest that it's aggression to not comply since you pose a threat to others for not doing something to yourself, as in their eyes a vaccine or a mask is harmless but does a whole lot of good for others?
Leftists are stupid. The non aggression principle has to do with property rights (all rights stem from property rights). Whether you wear a mask or not, is not a matter of violating any bodies property rights.
Now, if you were to go into a store, and that store required you to wear a mask, that is their property and they have every right to demand you wear a mask while on their property, for the same reason they have a right to demand you wear shoes, pants, and a shirt. They would also have every right to say the opposite and say masks are not allowed while on their property, and what they say goes, and if you don’t like it, then you can voluntarily associate with a different store.
A mandatory vaccine is a clear violation of property rights. A voluntary vaccine is not a violation of property rights.
Everything should be voluntary. EVERYthing. Leftists don’t understand the NAP, and like you said, they twist it.
How does the Non Aggression Principle apply to things like vaccines or mask mandates? Things where leftists twist the NAP to suggest that it's aggression to not comply since you pose a threat to others for not doing something to yourself, as in their eyes a vaccine or a mask is harmless but does a whole lot of good for others?
Leftists are stupid. The non aggression principle has to do with property rights (all rights stem from property rights). Whether you wear a mask or not, is not a matter of violating any bodies property rights.
Now, if you were to go into a store, and that store required you to wear a mask, that is their property and they have every right to demand you wear a mask while on their property, for the same reason they have a right to demand you wear shoes, pants, and a shirt. They would also have every right to say the opposite and say masks are not allowed while on their property, and what they say goes, and if you don’t like it, then you can voluntarily associate with a different store.
A mandatory vaccine is a clear violation of property rights. A voluntary vaccine is not a violation of property rights.
Everything should be voluntary. EVERYthing. Leftists don’t understand the NAP, and like you said, they twist it.
And that is where the ancap nonsense fails apart.
How does it fall apart exactly?
You should go research it elsewhere before knocking it. What random people here say ancap means isn't necessarily accurate.