15
Comments (3)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
metokur [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a Christian, knowing Jesus would have had to been born between 6 and 4 BC, I don't object to it on religious grounds. I object to it because it just took a simple thing we have been using for over a thousand years and made it needlessly complicated. Not only do people now use BC, AD, BCE and CE, but I have seen people use their own made up retarded name for something that should only have one name.

If BC and AD were instead named after people like Mohammed, do you think they would want to change that? No they wouldn't! They would probably make stickers of it and stick it on their apple laptop! But Jesus bad and mass murdering pedophiles good!