21
Comments (42)
sorted by:
3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
3
DeusExMAGAna [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Except the “information” they are informed on is not really information at all. They may be well-informed in some areas, but when they’re factoring in “information” created by some, admittedly epic, LARPing asshole, it warps their entire worldview

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
DeusExMAGAna [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

It had all you need to know about Q in it

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
DeusExMAGAna [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

People already suspected that publicly months before that. Namely, Mark Meadows.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m trying to copy and paste links in here but the site is not allowing me to. Just google “Mark Meadows Clinesmith 2018” and there’s articles from 6/2018 of Meadows unmasking Clinesmith. Then go to QAnon and search “Clinesmith”. The earliest I found, which is what I was already under the impression as being the case, of them mentioning Clinesmith is from 8/2018. It’s not as if anyone paying attention to everything couldn’t have made that educated guess anyway. Whoever is behind Q, they’re smart. Smart enough to fool over half the people on this site. They’re well informed, but too many of their “predictions”, or how people have interpreted them at least (which is the major issue) have turned out to be bullshit. They don’t have any inside knowledge. Just well-informed cold readers

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
DeusExMAGAna [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Even better. See? This is the kind of shit Q pulls. Does their homework, finds obscure information, makes educated guesses, leaves cryptic messages, then acts like they are some secret, behind-the-scenes operative or cabal.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
Libertas1776 1 point ago +4 / -3

It is fake. Whenever something happens they take claim on it, even though Q never predicted it, or said it’s happen in like 2018.

3
DeusExMAGAna [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct. And they speak in cryptic messages so when they’re wrong they can just act like people misinterpreted it. The people who fall for QAnon are the same people that fall for Peter Popoff and Sylvia Brown

-1
Tokens_Worth -1 points ago +3 / -4

False. Q tells us where to look. (Open source)
Anons DIG.

Theories are created. Morons like you think Q made the Theories.

Its getting old. But the MSM still has you.

3
Micdrop2017 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, list them then....

1
Micdrop2017 1 point ago +4 / -3

Well, pretty much. Still waiting for that Bill Clinton sex tape to drop or that other stuff Anon said would happen.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s the thing. They never actually say anything. As u/Tokens_Worth has pointed out, spammingly I might add, they tell people where to look and give super fucking cryptic “clues”. They never give a straight, definitive, 100% accurate answer or statement to anything, because they don’t know anything. The funniest part about it all is that everyone here talks about how Trump is the greatest troll of all time, and nobody stops to think that maybe sometimes he trolls some of “us” as well. That would be at the tippy-top of my suspicions

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never said they did. That was a different dude

1
Micdrop2017 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really? Do you really want to be embarrassed?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep shooting up that sweet, sweet hopium. I don’t know about you, but when I have something super fucking important to tell someone, I don’t usually make them go on a goddamn Easter egg hunt for it with cryptic, cold-reading like clues. I just tell them

1
deleted 1 point ago +7 / -6
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

What?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
kickascii 0 points ago +1 / -1

Q anon is a movement. Like any movement that threatens something powerful, it got infiltrated, co-opted, and suffered attacks.

0
sleepinggiant 0 points ago +2 / -2

Problem with Q is that nothing the public understands is happening. The public doesn't get 2 paragraph "gotcha" statement in 800 page document full of legalese that pins some easily replaceable lackey to the table with evidence.

To the public thats no different than your cell phone company saying you cant change your cell plan because of article h in subsection d of your cell phone contract. It's cryptic language and confusing as fuck.

The public understands: perp walks, jail sentences, court hearings, and executions. The public wants; perp walks, jail sentences, court hearings, and executions of the leaders not random easily replacable members of their rank and file.

The public isn't seeing that all we get is "Soon", "It's happening", so belief in Q is slipping. Even if the take down IS happening in the background all the public is seeing is paper work. The left gets collapsing cities, beat up conservatives, and free gibs. The right gets "follow the pen" and highlighted paper work. We are to the point where the people replacing the corrupt are now being found to be corrupt.

And understand at best, there is no water shed moment coming in the future. They wouldn't be doing this behind the curtains in an attempt to maintain the status quo if we were going to be entering some golden age of existence. From the outset Q stated this is a "changing of the guard" not a "changing of leadership" It's most likely that the underlings endangered the system so the global leaders are allowing their ouster for a slightly more benevolent management system.

1
DeusExMAGAna [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said

0
spotlight_inthedark 0 points ago +1 / -1

...And, your opinion is based on this one video, as well as, your years of experience in military intelligence no doubt.

2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because you know for a fact anyone involved with Q even completed basic training, let alone has years of military intelligence experience

0
spotlight_inthedark 0 points ago +1 / -1

How about Lt. General Michael Flynn?

2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

What does that have to do with QAnon? He hasn’t been conclusively linked in any way

0
Mitzhatzmakoph 0 points ago +2 / -2

I agree. However, that video was horrible and annoying and so unfunny (while attempting to be) that I felt myself cringing as I do watching lefties meltdown.

2
DeusExMAGAna [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t think it was trying to be funny at all. It was giving a simple analogy that the people who need to hear it can even understand. He even animated it. You know? Like how you do for children to get them to pay attention?