Even if the statues were actually of racists, but almost all of them aren't...
Who cares? If you want to make a point that certain statues should maybe be relegated to a museum, that's one thing.
But for almost every memorialized person, their acts of good outweigh their acts of garbage.
But let's not beat around the bush, here; the British branch of the AntiFA-BLM terrorist coalition vandalized the statue of a man -- Churchill -- who literally led his country against actual Nazis.
It ain't about racism, it's about destroying the country and rebuilding it in their image.
Not just Churchill but also Washington, Jefferson, the WW2 memorial, Lincoln, Grant, the 54th Massachusetts infantry (black soldiers who fought for the North), and, my absolute favorite, Frederick Douglass.
Yes, really. Frederick Douglass, a black man who escaped slavery at the age of 19 and went on to become the most influential abolitionist in history. He got knocked down, too. Racism will never recover!
This proves three things: 1) It was never about ending racism; 2) it was always about the junky thrill of pointless destruction; 3) these people are incredibly stupid.
I found that particularly galling. I’m quite confident that if you took a time machine and went back and fetched Churchill as the PM, And met Trump, they would get on famously.
Churchill in reality was a bit of a cantankerous stubborn bugger that didn’t suffer fools gladly and wasn’t too enamoured of Islam. The most recent movie of him was an insult to his memory and inaccurate, with stick out like a sore thumb woke ness and political correctness shoe horned in.
The sad irony is his grandson, Nicholas Churchill Soames, is a bit of a CINO (conservative in name only) , helped block Boris Johnson’s Brexit vote, and is an all round damp rich tea biscuit and a bit of a cuck.
Slavery is an act of garbage? It was a thing happening then and still around the world. If black slaves had it that bad they would have all went to Liberia, why didnt they? Black people are just mad they actually had to work. The nations fought against Germany because of allied propaganda and Hitlers aggression not because they were fighting ethnic nationalists. All nations were ethnic nationalists then, still are, except the white ones, but something tells me you really love diversity
Bruh, he didn't say that WW2 was about "fighting ethnic nationalists". He's noting the irony that these LARPers label anyone who disagrees with them as Nazis, but then go and tear down statues of people who fought ACTUAL Nazis.
To be quite honest, it's like you didn't even read my post at all.
But yes; slavery should be vilified, which is why we (whites) stood up against it. Even some of the people who fought on the other side didn't believe in slavery, but fought due to family or because of simply where they lived.
That goes for slavery today. Slavery intrinsically goes against what America stands for, and is immutably unconstitutional. If there is any American today that is pro-slavery, they're entitled to their opinions but this is an opinion that is wrong because it is at odds with what our country is and always strived to be.
Now as for the Nazi-related stuff, Yawnz13 is exactly right.
The left labels everyone that isn't strictly hard, radical left as Nazis. But they tear down statues of people who actually fought against Nazis, while accusing them of being racist Nazis.
REEEE!!!! But those are the racist stone people we worked so hard to make go smashy-smash because that will end racism or something!!
Even if the statues were actually of racists, but almost all of them aren't...
Who cares? If you want to make a point that certain statues should maybe be relegated to a museum, that's one thing.
But for almost every memorialized person, their acts of good outweigh their acts of garbage.
But let's not beat around the bush, here; the British branch of the AntiFA-BLM terrorist coalition vandalized the statue of a man -- Churchill -- who literally led his country against actual Nazis.
It ain't about racism, it's about destroying the country and rebuilding it in their image.
Not just Churchill but also Washington, Jefferson, the WW2 memorial, Lincoln, Grant, the 54th Massachusetts infantry (black soldiers who fought for the North), and, my absolute favorite, Frederick Douglass.
Yes, really. Frederick Douglass, a black man who escaped slavery at the age of 19 and went on to become the most influential abolitionist in history. He got knocked down, too. Racism will never recover!
This proves three things: 1) It was never about ending racism; 2) it was always about the junky thrill of pointless destruction; 3) these people are incredibly stupid.
It's about destroying all of the visible symbols of our nation and our culture so they can build a new one on top of its ruins.
And 4) need to all be lined up and shot.
It's about rewriting history.
I don't like RATM because they'e corporate sellouts now, but the line who controls the past, controls the future is spot on.
I found that particularly galling. I’m quite confident that if you took a time machine and went back and fetched Churchill as the PM, And met Trump, they would get on famously.
Churchill in reality was a bit of a cantankerous stubborn bugger that didn’t suffer fools gladly and wasn’t too enamoured of Islam. The most recent movie of him was an insult to his memory and inaccurate, with stick out like a sore thumb woke ness and political correctness shoe horned in.
The sad irony is his grandson, Nicholas Churchill Soames, is a bit of a CINO (conservative in name only) , helped block Boris Johnson’s Brexit vote, and is an all round damp rich tea biscuit and a bit of a cuck.
Slavery is an act of garbage? It was a thing happening then and still around the world. If black slaves had it that bad they would have all went to Liberia, why didnt they? Black people are just mad they actually had to work. The nations fought against Germany because of allied propaganda and Hitlers aggression not because they were fighting ethnic nationalists. All nations were ethnic nationalists then, still are, except the white ones, but something tells me you really love diversity
Bruh, he didn't say that WW2 was about "fighting ethnic nationalists". He's noting the irony that these LARPers label anyone who disagrees with them as Nazis, but then go and tear down statues of people who fought ACTUAL Nazis.
To be quite honest, it's like you didn't even read my post at all.
But yes; slavery should be vilified, which is why we (whites) stood up against it. Even some of the people who fought on the other side didn't believe in slavery, but fought due to family or because of simply where they lived.
That goes for slavery today. Slavery intrinsically goes against what America stands for, and is immutably unconstitutional. If there is any American today that is pro-slavery, they're entitled to their opinions but this is an opinion that is wrong because it is at odds with what our country is and always strived to be.
Now as for the Nazi-related stuff, Yawnz13 is exactly right.
The left labels everyone that isn't strictly hard, radical left as Nazis. But they tear down statues of people who actually fought against Nazis, while accusing them of being racist Nazis.
Pick your own cotton, nigga
I would rather that then have a bunch of jobless baboons in my country