Attacking her morals or pointing out her sexual history won’t change anyone’s mind. Destroying individual politicians is like squashing ants. There will always be other disposable politicians pushing the same old bad ideas.
It’s not people we need to attack. It’s the left’s economically destructive and morally bankrupt policies.
Persuade just 5% of the undecided middle why Leftism is a terrible idea and we win the political landscape for a generation.
I agree but with one caveat;
Pointing out that Kamala attended public events as Willie Brown's mistress, while Brown's wife was also present at those events, would have a big impact with suburban and married women. That could be decisive.
There's nothing but hate in Kamala the Harridan.
And mothers hate pedofiles and those who cover up for pedofiles
Say “No” to Pedo Joe and the Hoe.
Home wrecker is indeed very different, as it implies that the perpetrator had an affair with the married party in a malicious way. That’s who this woman is, she will say or do whatever it takes to get ahead and doesn’t have a shred of decency. Like Tucker always says, it seems like all of these politicians have a bad relationship with one or both of their parents, seems like Harris has father issues.
Policies aren’t elected, people are.
Saul alinsky says attack the individual not the institution
The sex stuff should be alluded to not stated, let people imagine those things ... there's enough evil and corruption in her public record.
"Saul alinsky says attack the individual not the institution"
This. It takes a lot of thinking to understand who economic and social policies are destructive. Most people don't and won't put it in. Those parts of the brain are new and less powerful. That's why left-wing dictators use policies like "Free money!" that don't make sense but tingle the feels. "She's a bitch!" goes right down the pre-built neural pathways. That's what moves elections . Their techniques work and we're going to use their own techniques against the left to destroy them.
She is married (to a white guy). She has kids, who look white. Make of that what you will... https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fliverampup.com%2Fuploads%2FKamala-harris-with-family2019.JPG&f=1&nofb=1
Only if you're a fucking retard voter.
The reason the Dems have nothing this year is because Trump took all the good policies. Name one good policy the Dems are running on anymore? They have nothing. Their biggest proposal in recent years was the Green New Deal that even their own voters don't want.
Black when it benefits her. Not black when black people needed someone to stand up for them in the criminal justice system.
People like Talcum X love that racial chameleon shit. And so do their followers.
I'm not so sure.
They like it when people pretend to be black, because that give their self-esteem a boost: someone wants to be like them.
But what about when they attempt to deny their blackness?
That doesn't go over so well.
It's not about denying blackness. It's about pretending to be black when it's convenient like you said. And pretending to be white when it's convenient in order to virtue signal to other white people.
Agree with you 100%.
Attacking Harris may be fun, but it won't accomplish a thing.
In addition to convincing people that leftist policies are fundamentally wrong and bad for this country, I think it's also important to convince people that the Democrat party has been taken over by radical socialist anarchist types and at this point they are willing to destroy the country, our cities, and our neighborhoods, if that's what it takes to hold on to power.
Cardi B fans view such attacks as reasons to admire and promote Kamala as a leader - she knows how to use available tools to climb the Ladder of Power.
Pence is a prude and gets roundly mocked for having "traditional" morals.
Pence gets mocked by losers who are angry that Trump/Pence won, but he is supported by most Americans who are good and decent.
I understand your point. But OP "Hoot" is correct that emphasizing Kopmala's sluttery won't shift the needle. Trump enjoyed the perks of his success by banging Playmates. Harris earned her success perks by banging Willie Brown. Morally, that makes their mutual pre-campaign sexcapades blurry enough to become semantics.
Hedonist lefties who embrace STDs like glitter-glam view Harris' strategy as empowering, "go-getting," since it enabled her to rise to her status faster than Hillary did. (KH became a Senator younger, and is jumping upward from that gig after only 4 years, vs Hillary being Senator for nearly a decade. Hillary also served a full term as SoS, while Biden is openly admitting that he won't last long and expects K to take over for him quickly, meaning K's whore tactic suckseeded at a rabbit-rapid pace vs. Clinton trying the long-slow-patient route.)
"Good and decent" Americans were never going to vote for Harris, and Lefties who embrace decadent degenerate debauchery view Pence's wholesome devoted respect for his wife as a Hallmark cornball cliche leftover from Salem Puritans.
A better angle is Kamala's blatant double-standard hypocrisies and phoniness. The way she constantly wielded available powers in cruel Swampy ways to maximally punish vulnerable low-hanging fruit victims, while using that same arsenal of legal tricks to protect donors who personally benefited her ambitions.
That habitual fascistic crony corruption is less admirable or empathetic vs. criticizing her promiscuity.
She's a scumbag in many of the same ways as Hunter, but by lumping her "dirty cop" crookedness w/ Biden's treachery makes it clear that their mutual words of support for "little people" only matter when soliciting votes = they're both rotten.
I'd put it this way. Liberals aren't interested in morality or even legal framework, unless they benefit. However for your scenario to work you have to assume the press would even ask them questions relating to their holding radical policies, or even report on the outcome of radical policies. I don't see that happening.
Whups you already said it lol
It's a waste of time to attack her.
"You're just attacking her because she's black/female."
That one sentence will negate absolutely any attack you can come up with.
Only as far as the other person is concerned but a well placed, "No I'm attacking her because she is a morally corrupt politician for [insert any one of her 100s of hypocritical actions here]," will be available for anyone on the fence, who is actually looking beyond her sex and whatever ethnicity she's appropriating that day, to use to decide whether or not she is or isn't trash.
Argue for the third party.
Ok, fine, but its FUN to make fun of her, and I'm going to keep doing it whenever the opportunity arises
Trump responded to questions about her by citing her policies.
edit: Remember how Kamala treated Justice Kavanaugh? Joe Biden Kamala Harris believes character assassination works. So who is telling us its futile?
Idk bruh. Most people don’t follow politics close enough to know. They only care about who gets more buzz/more famous
This!
I think both are helpful. Different people get red pilled in different ways. The realization of one politicians corrupt ways can lead you down a rabbit hole of other stuff. Use all tactics! Watch the #walkaway videos. Theres so many reasons for walking away
It literally does not matter what anyone says. She has the black card to play, she will have the majority of the black vote and ignorant white vote.
She may have a majority, but an 80% majority isn't as useful as a 60 or even 70% majority.
She isn't seen the same way that Obama or even Peach Mints is seen ... She doesn't have their kind of "community support," she's already well known as a fake opportunist.
Stay tuned ...
Yes, but Trump will have too much of the black vote, according to them. They need 90-100% of the black vote and they're not going to get it. The fact that they can't completely lock up the black vote is what they hate the most.
Yep. Ad hominem can come from both sides. So it doesn't really benefit us. It's just fun.
Do the part that you enjoy, let others point out how she fucked over if non violent weed offenders and how she fucked her way to the top. Even women that sucked their way to the top don't like it when it is pointed out, do you know how I know? They don't brag about it
Hit em on all sides, they aren't going to pull punches, they literally fabricate punches every day
Her being thr pick has helped with our fight in AZ to stop Prop 207. Its the Marijuana "legalization " bill thats going to give almost 75% of the excise tax money to the Good-Ole-Boy LEO in AZ. This bill does nothing to protect you. Literally nothing. Doesn't even fully remove cannabis from the Controlled Substance List. All it does is funnel money to control Arizonans more.
While I personally support the police, the AZ Mafia, same group keeping Sheriff Joe quiet, need to go. All of the weed activists are also BLM.
So I started using #DefendTheBlue on all of their posts supporting the bill. I let them know how MUCH their support to the shitty dirty cops means to all of Arizona. They also hate #SupportAllCops and #CopsLivesMatter.
When they come at me sideways, I direct them to the text in the bill proving my point. I tell them, "Youre the bad guy here. You don't even know what's in the bill you've sworn to support."
Its been wonderful.
"Vote for the Constitution!" or "Vote Trump 2020!"
We don't go out and vote for concepts. We rally around a leader.
It don't think it's futile, but the sexual history stuff isn't really funny that's the problem. I'm not prudish about comedy or jokes, it's that most of it basically insults and name calling rather than decent memes.
Not to mention women using their body to get ahead is a given so I don't know who you're really going to win points with on that.
Koala Bearris is mean af
Trump shouldn't respond directly to her. Let pedes like us be the attack dogs in this case. We'll run the "screen" as we say in the military for Trump's main attack on Biden. If a reporter asks about Kamala, Trump should just respond that she isn't running for POTUS and keep the focus on Sleepy Joe.
I mean with as much info is available can you really persuade people? If they are that intellectually lazy they are already democrats
Trump is attacking a woman-gasp. That will be their number one defense.
I know a Leftist female woke old friend that fucked over 40 guys before marriage at 25. Kamel sucking and fucking the way to the top does not concern the leftist.
Member that Portland chick spread eagle showing the cops her grimy twat setting on the pavement? Yeah they can give a fuck about morals and sex.
They diddle children and Get laws past to make it okay. Google that Weiner senator in SF.
Calling out cocksuckers won’t change a thing.
Really those aren't the people we're trying to win over, anyway. You want the mushy middle. The people who aren't left or right, but probably vote Democrat because the TV told them to.
I also believe in the high ground but this isn't a moral high ground situation anymore.
The rules have totally been thrown out the window, it's time for some people to "not, be nice." I'm absolutely not advocating for illegal behavior, that's what everyone undermining our country has done to "get Trump," that's THEIR game. But we don't have to try to charm our way into convincing people anymore. The truth is ugly.
I'd almost agree with this except can you imagine Joe taking the podium to talk about his parties policy position in detail over several hours, his aspirations for what he wants to achieve in the presidency? Pigs will fly first. You cant attack a policy if they have no policy.
So why not take easy wins when the opportunity presents?
Hmmm 🤔 doesn’t matter Pres. Trump is on a Mission from GOD !
😂😂