I listened to Tore and watched some of her videos. She started to talk about time travel and 'time Lord stuff' and how time fits into containers; just really weird unhinged stuff, so I'm inclined to say her credibility is very low to me.
On the other hand, I really want to believe that contractors are stoking and directing people and movements using that IIA crap. So I want to say the video has very little cred. but I still buy the general thesis.
I looked up consensus cracking. Not sure I understand. Are you saying it's the truth presented with credibility problems so that viewers will later regard that truth as not credible?
Perhaps you could explain how this documentary is an example of consensus cracking.
I listened to Tore and watched some of her videos. She started to talk about time travel and 'time Lord stuff' and how time fits into containers; just really weird unhinged stuff, so I'm inclined to say her credibility is very low to me.
On the other hand, I really want to believe that contractors are stoking and directing people and movements using that IIA crap. So I want to say the video has very little cred. but I still buy the general thesis.
Which is probably dumb.
I did think while watching it: is this video about IIA itself an IIA?
If it was an IIA I think the point might be to send you into conspiracy overdrive, seeing everything as a conspiracy?
I looked up consensus cracking. Not sure I understand. Are you saying it's the truth presented with credibility problems so that viewers will later regard that truth as not credible?
Perhaps you could explain how this documentary is an example of consensus cracking.