Yeah, I gotta say the emotion angle is way too flattering. We are inadvertently painting these terrible people as empathetic, when they are the furthest thing from it. We must be precise with our criticisms.
And appeal to authority and appeal to consensus. There are plenty of people, who'd assume the behaviors they witness on other people just so that they don't stand out.
If you put them in a room with 30 people all of whom share some behavior, they'd just imitate that behavior without any resistance. If everyone holds their hands up, so will these gullible people. If everyone jumps in order to move, so will they.
Remember the experiment where the test subject has the task to ask questions from another person and has to administer punishment via electroshocks if he fails? 60% of people escalated to the lethal dosage, and it was enough that one person with perceived position of authority said "please continue."
Isn't it interesting how such obedience leads to so many bad outcomes, yet every leftist narrative is one where the lack of obedience is said to be the source of all problems? Apparently the communists, Nazis and their victims obeyed a LOT and how did that turn out?
Most people understand Goebbels to be a pure Propagandist - who controlled the 'entire media message' the German People saw.. newspapers, magazines, radio, movies, - - everything was controlled. Even controlled the opposition as well - by arresting them - and outlawing them - ALL OF THEM.
That is the legacy of Goebbels - 'Media Propaganda' - which led to WWII and a willing Nation of Germans who did not know the truth - ready to kill all those who were not German.
Follow me for a sec...
If you’re pro-abortion, it’s not that far of a stretch to start killing a person because the key ingredients to make that mental leap is a closer distance than a pro-life person would have to make. So the logic seems to follow that a pro-abortion stance is less likely to value human life.
I also think that most serial killers were probably pro-abortion - curios to see what the statistics are on serial killers and their stance on abortion but my guess is that they are more likely pro-abortion. All pro-abortionists are not serial killers but all serial killers are probably pro-abortion.
Which is ironic because the left loves to talk about how much they care and love everyone but as soon as there’s a disagreement - they want to abort you. As evidenced by the recent uptick in deaths during the riots.
They are everything they profess not to be, and the worst part about it is that they walk around like they’re Christ in the flesh. My goodness the irony, since they are the first to yell “crucify him!” when they see a Christian.
Homosexuality (no possibility of children), feminism (too busy working to have them) are also anti-life. It’s amazing how simple they are when you get to the essence.
Yes, hadn’t thought of that but it may very well be the case.
If that is though, it makes me wonder if the the pro-life vs pro-abortion at it’s root is some kind of commentary of sociopathy and psychopathy. I think a case study on that would be very interesting, to see what the results would be.
I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; followed through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make? Doesn’t it follow that someone who values the life of the mother over the child would not take an “all lives matter” stance? Seems logical.
The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - why wouldn’t you assume “all lives matter” includes Black Lives? What’s the ultimate result of valuing one life over the other; isn’t it just death? All I‘m saying is that we need to make room for everyone, including children. BLM seems to think there’s only room for their side just like the Left seems to think there’s only room for one side (the mother). If you follow the premise to its conclusion, its a logical progression of ideas with results to match.
Here’s my response to the “but it’s too simplistic” phrase: “2+2=5”.
If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas. The results of such absurd ideas are coming to fruition in our generation in front of our eyes.
I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated:
‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’
There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.
As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in line with their beliefs on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.
Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; I just have to ask at what point is responsibility ever something promoted by the left? Is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? We’re not talking about a small statistic of non-rape abortions. This is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.
My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The womens’ sexual freedom movement, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity is merely supplying naive women to creepy men, which opens up more avenues for the sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement thereafter have made the good men (the men who are worried about their reputation) afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, more opportunities.
Even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near a women. The men who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it’s logical). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.
There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?
Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. Here’s my solution for the pedophile problem (which Hollywood is filled with), how about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them for it. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood? If Black Lives Mattered, what about the children who are aborted? The left stance has so much cognitive dissonance it’s very difficult for me to follow.
How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing?
I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood). There’s a better solution than Abortion.
There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them. That the stigma of being a “rape child” would go away completely just like the way the stigma of being a “gay man” has been done away. The women who make these life-affirming decisions should be celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them, they should be given a parade bigger than the LGBT parades; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.
That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for ONCE, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.
Lefties are just communist versions of Islamic terrorists. Change my mind
Commies are the original terrorists. EVerything else is their emanations.
Based Crusaders!
So... commies?
Rooted in the same supernatural evil
Very different in a materialistic sense
MSM - like Joseph Goebbels - is brainwashing the Left -
And they are so stupid that it is easy to to.
Its a psyop. Media is a tool. https://thedonald.win/p/GuwydsbV/clearforce--shadownet--ipsy-expo/c/
and when people don't buy it...
show them this -
Morning Mika suffers on-air meltdown….
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/msm-message-to-trump-supporters-how-stupid-can-you-be/
This is what MSM MEDIA Psy Ops looks like over-the-air.
This stunt was intended to Push Far Leftie Mentally ILL People Over-The-Edge...
Don't get it, what's so crazy about that rant?..... YIKES!!
What a nut job - that includes basically all of the NBC family btw.
Yeah, I gotta say the emotion angle is way too flattering. We are inadvertently painting these terrible people as empathetic, when they are the furthest thing from it. We must be precise with our criticisms.
The emotion is in their hatred of white people. That’s why they dismiss it.
And appeal to authority and appeal to consensus. There are plenty of people, who'd assume the behaviors they witness on other people just so that they don't stand out.
If you put them in a room with 30 people all of whom share some behavior, they'd just imitate that behavior without any resistance. If everyone holds their hands up, so will these gullible people. If everyone jumps in order to move, so will they.
Remember the experiment where the test subject has the task to ask questions from another person and has to administer punishment via electroshocks if he fails? 60% of people escalated to the lethal dosage, and it was enough that one person with perceived position of authority said "please continue."
Isn't it interesting how such obedience leads to so many bad outcomes, yet every leftist narrative is one where the lack of obedience is said to be the source of all problems? Apparently the communists, Nazis and their victims obeyed a LOT and how did that turn out?
Most people understand Goebbels to be a pure Propagandist - who controlled the 'entire media message' the German People saw.. newspapers, magazines, radio, movies, - - everything was controlled. Even controlled the opposition as well - by arresting them - and outlawing them - ALL OF THEM.
That is the legacy of Goebbels - 'Media Propaganda' - which led to WWII and a willing Nation of Germans who did not know the truth - ready to kill all those who were not German.
This is NOT a good thing.
The left is anti-life (as is communism).
Follow me for a sec... If you’re pro-abortion, it’s not that far of a stretch to start killing a person because the key ingredients to make that mental leap is a closer distance than a pro-life person would have to make. So the logic seems to follow that a pro-abortion stance is less likely to value human life.
I also think that most serial killers were probably pro-abortion - curios to see what the statistics are on serial killers and their stance on abortion but my guess is that they are more likely pro-abortion. All pro-abortionists are not serial killers but all serial killers are probably pro-abortion.
Which is ironic because the left loves to talk about how much they care and love everyone but as soon as there’s a disagreement - they want to abort you. As evidenced by the recent uptick in deaths during the riots.
They are everything they profess not to be, and the worst part about it is that they walk around like they’re Christ in the flesh. My goodness the irony, since they are the first to yell “crucify him!” when they see a Christian.
Homosexuality (no possibility of children), feminism (too busy working to have them) are also anti-life. It’s amazing how simple they are when you get to the essence.
I'd argue that serial killers will probably be indifferent to the abortion argument.
Yes, hadn’t thought of that but it may very well be the case.
If that is though, it makes me wonder if the the pro-life vs pro-abortion at it’s root is some kind of commentary of sociopathy and psychopathy. I think a case study on that would be very interesting, to see what the results would be.
When abortion was illegal, people behaved differently. They were more careful about getting pregnant. They were more responsible.
Imagine that.
I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; followed through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make? Doesn’t it follow that someone who values the life of the mother over the child would not take an “all lives matter” stance? Seems logical.
The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - why wouldn’t you assume “all lives matter” includes Black Lives? What’s the ultimate result of valuing one life over the other; isn’t it just death? All I‘m saying is that we need to make room for everyone, including children. BLM seems to think there’s only room for their side just like the Left seems to think there’s only room for one side (the mother). If you follow the premise to its conclusion, its a logical progression of ideas with results to match.
Here’s my response to the “but it’s too simplistic” phrase: “2+2=5”.
If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas. The results of such absurd ideas are coming to fruition in our generation in front of our eyes.
I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated: ‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’
There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.
As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in line with their beliefs on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.
Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; I just have to ask at what point is responsibility ever something promoted by the left? Is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? We’re not talking about a small statistic of non-rape abortions. This is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.
My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The womens’ sexual freedom movement, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity is merely supplying naive women to creepy men, which opens up more avenues for the sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement thereafter have made the good men (the men who are worried about their reputation) afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, more opportunities.
Even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near a women. The men who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it’s logical). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.
There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?
Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. Here’s my solution for the pedophile problem (which Hollywood is filled with), how about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them for it. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood? If Black Lives Mattered, what about the children who are aborted? The left stance has so much cognitive dissonance it’s very difficult for me to follow.
How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing?
I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood). There’s a better solution than Abortion.
There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them. That the stigma of being a “rape child” would go away completely just like the way the stigma of being a “gay man” has been done away. The women who make these life-affirming decisions should be celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them, they should be given a parade bigger than the LGBT parades; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.
That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for ONCE, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.
Women are for babies. Men are for pleasure.
Where you been Barry? Greece or the Middle East?
Man-love Thursday
Big mike? Dat you?