3494
Comments (170)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
DX5_ [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Show me proof of this company immediately taking action.

AMN acknowledged that this individual worked for them in some capacity. That's a big deal.
-AMN could be lying about details, just to prevent this from destroying their corporation.
-Anyone with access to the facility or the inner workings of it could cause harm.
-The investigation is not one for AMN to conduct themselves, given the conflict of interest.
-AMN provided no resolution to this case.

I don't think it's harassment to respectfully ask this company for an update. I said nothing untruthful about AMN in this post. I conveyed the response they gave me. If their response elicits a negative reaction then that's on them.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DX5_ [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I submitted it several months ago to law enforcement. It's possible law enforcement did get involved. You're wrong that they cannot satisfy my inquiries. What the fuck do you think my whole purpose was in asking them regularly? They could easily confirm that this individual no longer works for them. But this company doesn't want to. So I put the pressure on them.