3341
Comments (181)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
33
AngryWriter 33 points ago +33 / -0

Even without the blatant hypocracy, the "fact-check" is one of those absolutely moronic fact-check's. Basically says "well, it's true but if we assume intent that hasn't been claimed that makes it misleading". Which is pretty much what 90%+ of the "lies" Trump told are.

13
The5thEstate [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

That is what I find amusing when I see those "lie counters" in various outlets. I mean, some of the "lies" are opinions that later turned out to be incorrect (Trump isn't a seer, but that counts as a "lie"), or when he embellished a story. Not to mention those very same outlets are undoubtedly, verifiably lying.

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the real big ones are slowly coming to light, like "Obama spied on me"

8
Keiichi81 8 points ago +8 / -0

And as we all know, if a claim (by a conservative) is even 5% misleading then it's declared 100% false.

"Trump claimed it rained today, but it was also sunny and overcast in addition to when it was raining, making this claim misleading. Rating: MOSTLY FALSE! Add this one to the 43,541 other lies that Trump has told."

4
hit_backspace 4 points ago +4 / -0

Big tech having this ability is pushing us further into a corporation controlled dystopia. They must be able to be sued for any of their regulatory decisions.