nope...he was just pissed bc of the whole "i was sitting in my dorm room smokin' a spliff and listening to tupac & snoop," bc it reflected poorly on the image people have of jamaicans. irl, he is/was an economics prof, deep into marxism. that rotten apple didn't fall far from the diseased tree. spez to say: there's a pic out there of the father/daughter, and damn if her father doesn't look like an aged obama.
The D's know they can't win so they put out the back benchers to save future candidates like tulsi or some other they come up with to give a try in 2024. Now this doesn't mean they won't try especially with mail in fraud and ballot harvesting but the main focus for biden and harris is to be as toxic as possible to Trump putting him down at every turn. This will be the 2016 elections all over again only a thousand times worse because no matter what the D's won't concede when Trump wins and drive their base into even greater rioting. I really hope Trump has the military on his side because I think we are going to need them to stop the insane from burning everything down.
Generals and admirals can be beached and replaced along with any other officers Trump wants as commander in chief especially if an emergency is declared. But the test is will the military overall follow leadership Trump picks. I'd like to say yes but thats a test I'd rather avoid.
Well speaking from a statistics position, the chances are almost 0% that ALL of the military would move as one. I believe if shit really gets that bad, and Trump summons them up, MOST of the military will rally to POTUS.
ALL would be great, but that just isn’t reality. And that’s scary. Better left untested as you said.
Yep, military has its own pro BLM/Socialist people too. Combat arms is more likely to have conservative leaning soldiers than non combat branches. If we add demographics, non combat branches typically have the most women and minorities.
Tulsi Gabbard has a better chance at a future with the Republicans than she does with the Democrats. Republicans don’t agree with her, but they will listen to her. Democrats just flat dislike her, she not left enough. Almost like Dennis Kucinich.
Tulsi is a globalist. She will be parked perfectly in moderates minds to have a 'sane' and 'mainstream' candidate for the D's since the current batch are all insane marxists. She could have won the nomination if the media and dnc hadn't torpedoed her as even conservatives warmed to her. This fight is going to take a generation or more to finish and Trump is simply paving the way to start it.
Tulsi Gabbard has no chance with any Republican, what are you talking about? She thinks she has moderates and progressives tricked with her bs, but if you've been on thedonald long enough, you know that sick puppy is a hardcore libtard globalist
Of course. Hold on to the house and get a super majority in the senate or at least enough so the rinos can vote to impeach Trump. That's the very first thing they will do if they win congress and it will be over in a month. After that the riots from both sides begin as Trump's base isn't going to sit around if he gets impeached on bullshit charges again. We are well and truly at War for the country people and the left is all in by any means necessary.
My take has been this is an earnings year. Their war chest is laughably small next to the republican earnings.
If you look at their expenditures it doesn’t look like someone who is trying to win. It looks to me like someone who is saving for the next fight. They are not holding any conventions and their outreach seems pretty minimal. I’ve seen one Facebook ad! I’ve had numerous text campaigns. SMS is cheap.
They just need to specify the funds are for the next election and they can sit on it for three years.
I’m interested in everyone’s take on this. I explain to my wife how Kumala has no ideals or thoughts of her own, and she said isn’t that the point of a politician. Essentially saying that a politician should just float with the public sentiment wind.
So officials should rise to reflect the opinion of those they represent. The difference is sharing those actual beliefs and pretending to share those beliefs.
Example: Paul Ryan was the VP Candidate for the Republican Party with Romney. Paul was speaker of the house with Republican control of both houses and the Presidency in 2017. You would think Paul would have floored votes to pass laws he campaigned on. Instead he went silent, disappeared and then retired.
He had the chance to fulfill his campaign promises and that is when we found out he did not actually believe in those things.
If he was going to end his career, why not go down flooring a vote a day?
The wife in question asks "Kumala has no ideals or thoughts of her own, and she said isn’t that the point of a politician"?
The point of politicians in a representative based form of government is to represent and not pretend to represent. To show leadership of those positions and to solve problems the people are facing
Politicians are supposed to listen to their constituents and use their feedback to make public policy. But the politician should hold a set of core values that helps guide them, as well as tell the public how they lean on the larger issues.
Politicians are not supposed to be empty vessels that listen to only the party insiders. There's no way the public can trust someone like that. There's no way their colleagues can work with someone like that.
It's the people behind the scens they are beholden to that are the problem. Harris puts her finger to the wind because she just wants to get in office. Once there she won't even give her voters/supporters what they want. It's like Obama and Clinton.
She being exposed as a corrupt politician who will do or say anything to achieve power. But you already knew that.
Now that he benefits her, the sexism & racism is cool.
She's so incredibly unlikable and fake that her own father called her out on her bullshit.
The Left are the biggest goddamn suckers its unbelievable.
If you are late to a party you are tardy.
If you are late to a Demoncrat party you are retarded.
If you are going to a Democrat party, you are retarded.
Isn't that called "retardy"?
Retardy
"Thanks for believing I was raped. It's traumatizing being insulted by stran..." -survivor
"Oh LOL I was using u for to advance my career ahahah, stupid!" - Kamala
nope...he was just pissed bc of the whole "i was sitting in my dorm room smokin' a spliff and listening to tupac & snoop," bc it reflected poorly on the image people have of jamaicans. irl, he is/was an economics prof, deep into marxism. that rotten apple didn't fall far from the diseased tree. spez to say: there's a pic out there of the father/daughter, and damn if her father doesn't look like an aged obama.
"It was a debate" is the new "peaceful protesters".
GEOTUS's twitter comments are a running gag. How many years did the same people comment negative shit at Trump's twitter every single day?
Imagine how demoralizing it must be to know the only positive comments about your candidate are astroturfed paid shills?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/kamala-harris-father-denounces-daughters-marijuana-joke
I'm sure she offered him a blowjob after the segment
"No thanks, I have a few dicks of my own to suck before I head home tonight."
Not sure there would be all that much hardness to pass on.
Pretty much all of feminism summed up in a few words
The D's know they can't win so they put out the back benchers to save future candidates like tulsi or some other they come up with to give a try in 2024. Now this doesn't mean they won't try especially with mail in fraud and ballot harvesting but the main focus for biden and harris is to be as toxic as possible to Trump putting him down at every turn. This will be the 2016 elections all over again only a thousand times worse because no matter what the D's won't concede when Trump wins and drive their base into even greater rioting. I really hope Trump has the military on his side because I think we are going to need them to stop the insane from burning everything down.
Dont count on the military. A bunch of Obama generals are in charge. The new CSAF is a blm supporting cuck.
Generals and admirals can be beached and replaced along with any other officers Trump wants as commander in chief especially if an emergency is declared. But the test is will the military overall follow leadership Trump picks. I'd like to say yes but thats a test I'd rather avoid.
Well speaking from a statistics position, the chances are almost 0% that ALL of the military would move as one. I believe if shit really gets that bad, and Trump summons them up, MOST of the military will rally to POTUS.
ALL would be great, but that just isn’t reality. And that’s scary. Better left untested as you said.
Yep, military has its own pro BLM/Socialist people too. Combat arms is more likely to have conservative leaning soldiers than non combat branches. If we add demographics, non combat branches typically have the most women and minorities.
Now you're making a case for fragging.
Tulsi Gabbard has a better chance at a future with the Republicans than she does with the Democrats. Republicans don’t agree with her, but they will listen to her. Democrats just flat dislike her, she not left enough. Almost like Dennis Kucinich.
Uh, no thanks on Tulsi
She seems like some Manchurian candidate shit... Look at the weird religions she's been into and her family is strange
Seriously... no thanks on any dumb cunt who wants to treat immigration like a revolving door with free gibs.
It’s a matter of perspective - no thanks on tulsi representing Texas, but if she flipped a Hawaiian seat to Rino status? Absolutely!
Tulsi is a globalist. She will be parked perfectly in moderates minds to have a 'sane' and 'mainstream' candidate for the D's since the current batch are all insane marxists. She could have won the nomination if the media and dnc hadn't torpedoed her as even conservatives warmed to her. This fight is going to take a generation or more to finish and Trump is simply paving the way to start it.
Tulsi Gabbard has no chance with any Republican, what are you talking about? She thinks she has moderates and progressives tricked with her bs, but if you've been on thedonald long enough, you know that sick puppy is a hardcore libtard globalist
Tulsi made the mistake of forgetting that the Democrat primary is neither fair nor impartial.
F A T A L I T Y
If she can't outwit the local politicians, she's not qualified to deal with the international ones.
She's in on it all just like Bernie. Just playing her part.
The day Tulsi Gabbard runs as a Republican is the day I vote for the fucking Green party.
no tier 1 candidate is going to be sacrificed on Trump's altar of re-election.
this election also provides them a testing ground for further vote stealing schemes they can execute in later elections.
Of course. Hold on to the house and get a super majority in the senate or at least enough so the rinos can vote to impeach Trump. That's the very first thing they will do if they win congress and it will be over in a month. After that the riots from both sides begin as Trump's base isn't going to sit around if he gets impeached on bullshit charges again. We are well and truly at War for the country people and the left is all in by any means necessary.
My take has been this is an earnings year. Their war chest is laughably small next to the republican earnings.
If you look at their expenditures it doesn’t look like someone who is trying to win. It looks to me like someone who is saving for the next fight. They are not holding any conventions and their outreach seems pretty minimal. I’ve seen one Facebook ad! I’ve had numerous text campaigns. SMS is cheap.
They just need to specify the funds are for the next election and they can sit on it for three years.
I’m interested in everyone’s take on this. I explain to my wife how Kumala has no ideals or thoughts of her own, and she said isn’t that the point of a politician. Essentially saying that a politician should just float with the public sentiment wind.
So officials should rise to reflect the opinion of those they represent. The difference is sharing those actual beliefs and pretending to share those beliefs.
Example: Paul Ryan was the VP Candidate for the Republican Party with Romney. Paul was speaker of the house with Republican control of both houses and the Presidency in 2017. You would think Paul would have floored votes to pass laws he campaigned on. Instead he went silent, disappeared and then retired.
He had the chance to fulfill his campaign promises and that is when we found out he did not actually believe in those things.
If he was going to end his career, why not go down flooring a vote a day?
The wife in question asks "Kumala has no ideals or thoughts of her own, and she said isn’t that the point of a politician"?
The point of politicians in a representative based form of government is to represent and not pretend to represent. To show leadership of those positions and to solve problems the people are facing
Politicians are supposed to listen to their constituents and use their feedback to make public policy. But the politician should hold a set of core values that helps guide them, as well as tell the public how they lean on the larger issues.
Politicians are not supposed to be empty vessels that listen to only the party insiders. There's no way the public can trust someone like that. There's no way their colleagues can work with someone like that.
It's the people behind the scens they are beholden to that are the problem. Harris puts her finger to the wind because she just wants to get in office. Once there she won't even give her voters/supporters what they want. It's like Obama and Clinton.
The entire problem with this country is we have politicians that act exactly how your wife thinks they should act.
very few women have ideals
they just spread their legs for whoever has the biggest dick in the room
In other words a Democrat