"Calling for" and "cutting" the jobs are two completely different things.. . it won't do much good to go into an argument with brand new ammo if your ammo is incorrect... Provable facts matter when your goal is to win an argument.
is there somewhere else that says he actually "cut" them, the way the title claims he does, or does he just "call" for them to be cut the way, the corresponding article says?
Agree, but you could also just adjust the argument and use this to show that even Saint Obama wanted to trim the USPS workforce significantly, it's not just Cheeto Hitler scheming ways to steal the election.
Won't work. They will unabashedly say that intention is what matters, not actions, and they somehow are experts at reading Trump's intention and his mind, along with Obama's of course. Obama good guy, Trump not good.
"Calling for" and "cutting" the jobs are two completely different things..
Different, but not completely different. Saying they are completely different is completely different from the truth.
10K jobs cut. 83.33 % accurate.
Calling for the Job cuts is the key part - because that is what the left is criticizing President Trump for now.
Don't be like Snopes. Be better, or as Melania says Be Best.
100% accuracy all the time isn't best. Look at President Trump - it is more about the message and whether the substantial portion of the message is true - NOT about the details.
"Calling for" and "cutting" the jobs are two completely different things.. . it won't do much good to go into an argument with brand new ammo if your ammo is incorrect... Provable facts matter when your goal is to win an argument.
is there somewhere else that says he actually "cut" them, the way the title claims he does, or does he just "call" for them to be cut the way, the corresponding article says?
Bad wording on my part. Called for. The budget negotiation process eventually lead to 10K reduction in USPS personnel.
https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2019/04/usps-cuts-10k-positions-after-five-years-job-growth/156460/
https://archive.vn/wip/GzjnU
You're good. Always thinking ahead.
Speaking of which, I'm not so sure they can easily tell that the archive is a copy of the URL you can't share.
So, if you archive the stuff they won't let you send first (and possibly make a new archive even if it hasn't changed) ...
Agree, but you could also just adjust the argument and use this to show that even Saint Obama wanted to trim the USPS workforce significantly, it's not just Cheeto Hitler scheming ways to steal the election.
Won't work. They will unabashedly say that intention is what matters, not actions, and they somehow are experts at reading Trump's intention and his mind, along with Obama's of course. Obama good guy, Trump not good.
Different, but not completely different. Saying they are completely different is completely different from the truth.
10K jobs cut. 83.33 % accurate.
Calling for the Job cuts is the key part - because that is what the left is criticizing President Trump for now.
Don't be like Snopes. Be better, or as Melania says Be Best.
100% accuracy all the time isn't best. Look at President Trump - it is more about the message and whether the substantial portion of the message is true - NOT about the details.
Learn from President Trump.