I haven't seen that one. I also didn't seen a few of the roger Moore ones. But they were all panned. I think everyone can agree Moore was our least favorite, right?
I like Roger Moore. His movies are generally charming, if not delightful, in their absurdity and outlandish fun. That being the case, my favourite Bond movie is "For Your Eyes Only," which stars Moore, and that is a serious Bond -- a straight-up espionage, Col War, spy thriller. If you haven't seen that, give it a shot. Heck! Give ALL the Bonds a shot because they all have their charm!
I own all of the Bond movies, even the two non-cannon Casino Royals and Never Say Never Again. On Her Majesty's Secret Service is my favorite because I'm a sentimental fool, and a Christmas Bond movie is supremely comfy.
The only Bond movie I dislike is The World Is Not Enough. The story is great, but Denise Richards' acting is what gave Charlie Sheen AIDS.
OHMSS is fantastic. If anything, the Bond girls are great! It begins a little off, then quickly finds its groove. I would have liked to have seen another movie with Lazenby because he did well.
I like TWINE and I agree that Richards is the absolute WORST Bond girl. And the last line in the movie (about Christmas "coming" twice a year) was out of place and weird. Otherwise, it was a good movie with one of the better plots of the Brosnon era.
That is a good one. The best of Moore's. His early films were better. I have done a marathon a few times but never saw the Timothy Dalton one. Some of the later Moore films were so forgettable and indistinct I sort of mash them together. Back when Craig was announced as the next bond I was so outraged that I signed an anti-Craig petition to EON to get someone else. Since then I've come to like Craig, though the last film was somewhat weak.
I think I would rank them as Brosnan, Craig, then Moore. Connery is sort of an archetype in himself that can't be fairly compared. Go watch Dr. No after watching Goldeneye or Specter and you will think the film a joke. Connery carried the show. Without him there would be no franchise.
I think that every Bond actor went through an arc on which their early movies were great and their later movies were not-so-great. I must admit to not being a fan of the Craig era movies: I find them to be too Jason Bourne-ish and lacking in the style and charm that, to me, made Bond Bond.
I haven't seen that one. I also didn't seen a few of the roger Moore ones. But they were all panned. I think everyone can agree Moore was our least favorite, right?
I like Roger Moore. His movies are generally charming, if not delightful, in their absurdity and outlandish fun. That being the case, my favourite Bond movie is "For Your Eyes Only," which stars Moore, and that is a serious Bond -- a straight-up espionage, Col War, spy thriller. If you haven't seen that, give it a shot. Heck! Give ALL the Bonds a shot because they all have their charm!
I own all of the Bond movies, even the two non-cannon Casino Royals and Never Say Never Again. On Her Majesty's Secret Service is my favorite because I'm a sentimental fool, and a Christmas Bond movie is supremely comfy.
The only Bond movie I dislike is The World Is Not Enough. The story is great, but Denise Richards' acting is what gave Charlie Sheen AIDS.
OHMSS is fantastic. If anything, the Bond girls are great! It begins a little off, then quickly finds its groove. I would have liked to have seen another movie with Lazenby because he did well.
I like TWINE and I agree that Richards is the absolute WORST Bond girl. And the last line in the movie (about Christmas "coming" twice a year) was out of place and weird. Otherwise, it was a good movie with one of the better plots of the Brosnon era.
That is a good one. The best of Moore's. His early films were better. I have done a marathon a few times but never saw the Timothy Dalton one. Some of the later Moore films were so forgettable and indistinct I sort of mash them together. Back when Craig was announced as the next bond I was so outraged that I signed an anti-Craig petition to EON to get someone else. Since then I've come to like Craig, though the last film was somewhat weak. I think I would rank them as Brosnan, Craig, then Moore. Connery is sort of an archetype in himself that can't be fairly compared. Go watch Dr. No after watching Goldeneye or Specter and you will think the film a joke. Connery carried the show. Without him there would be no franchise.
I think that every Bond actor went through an arc on which their early movies were great and their later movies were not-so-great. I must admit to not being a fan of the Craig era movies: I find them to be too Jason Bourne-ish and lacking in the style and charm that, to me, made Bond Bond.
Have you read the books? If not, then you must!
Read Mr. Moto, too.