He broke the law. Period.
It doesn't matter what he felt or thought about what the NSA was doing. He had a chain of command & an in house IG he never used. He did what he wanted.
Most dipshits under thirty-five these days don't know, or give a damn about proper procedure. They go off of emotion and feelings, then wonder why they are in a world of shit.
Stupid question, why the hell aren't you using that logic on the nsa? Or do those ends justify the means? What ends justify breaking your oath to uphold the constitution? Let's make it very clear where you stand on that! Then we can argue about who's the traitor.
Why are do people automatucally jump to what the NSA did and want to turn a blind eye to Snowden?
This is why, in my oringianl post, I never brought the NSA up.
Your logic is just like Orange man bad, so we must resist.
The NSA did something I dont like, so we need to lick Snowdens taint.
In that case, he should have never done it because the American people don't give a damn that they're being spied on. Would that tickle your fancy?
So the ends justify the means, got it.
He broke the law. Period. It doesn't matter what he felt or thought about what the NSA was doing. He had a chain of command & an in house IG he never used. He did what he wanted.
Most dipshits under thirty-five these days don't know, or give a damn about proper procedure. They go off of emotion and feelings, then wonder why they are in a world of shit.
Stupid question, why the hell aren't you using that logic on the nsa? Or do those ends justify the means? What ends justify breaking your oath to uphold the constitution? Let's make it very clear where you stand on that! Then we can argue about who's the traitor.
Why are do people automatucally jump to what the NSA did and want to turn a blind eye to Snowden? This is why, in my oringianl post, I never brought the NSA up.
Your logic is just like Orange man bad, so we must resist. The NSA did something I dont like, so we need to lick Snowdens taint.