I was going to click out of the video near the beginning after the Trump part, but I decided to watch the whole thing and am glad I did. Lots of Trump in that video, but the whole video was amazing.. Thanks for sharing that.
"There will be a praying President, not a religious one. For I will fool the people, yes I will." God says, "The one that is chosen shall go in and they shall say 'he has hot blood.'" For the spirit of God says, "yes, he may have hot blood, but he will bring the walls of protection on this country in a greater way and the economy of this country shall change rapidly," says the Lord of hosts. Listen to the word of the Lord. God says, "I will put at your helm for two terms a President that will pray, but he will not be a praying President when he starts. I will put him in office and then I will baptize him with the Holy Spirit and My power," says the Lord of hosts.
April 4th, 2007
"Trump shall become a trumpet!" says the Lord. No, you didn't hear me. (pause) Trump shall become a trumpet. Are you listening to me? I will raise up the Trump to become a Trumpet.
Chills.... honestly... like I said, I'm not religious.. but this really makes you think. Especially how Trump has become much more religious the past 4 years.
I follow religion because of the values it teaches but what I mean is that I don't really dive into prophecies and superstitions and that sort of thing. I'm probably the most agnostic religious person there is. I believe there is tremendous value in believing and practicing religion, but more of me believes that the "visions" all the people in the bible had and all the stories came from early humans tripping the fuck out on mushrooms and acacia.
Lots of concern trolls out tonight pushing the same bs as usually, at least they picked a better generic name like "Proud American" to push blackpilled 8chan shit instead of random numbers and letters like yesterday lmao
BLM made a lot of people race aware, that and some people have direct experience with racial discrimination and the hatred towards them.
It's hard to walk the line between being honest about race issues and not be perceived as a "racist", but diplomacy is the only way to avoid violence and so we have to be able to talk about things honestly.
Some people are taken NG their anger at the blm crowd and aiming it at all black people. This is exactly what the deep state want. If you pay attention, a large majority of the violent blm movement are white, not black.
Certainly, the animal is not at fault for its' baser instincts, but that doesnt mean you treat a copperhead with love and affection in hopes it won't bite you. You stay the fuck away.
Blockchain isn't foolproof, and in fact could make cheating easier. Basically if a majority of all the computers that host ledgers agree with a result, then that result is considered "true".
But who controls the computers where the ledgers are stored?!
In theory, someone who controlled enough nodes in the network could forge an incorrect result and then force the rest of the network to accept it as "true".
We'd be replacing the Electoral College with computers. This is a nightmare.
The post offices run by liberal unions are going to host a server with only a single field guy in the regional office who has the slightest idea how to operate it? That doesn't sound ripe for fraud... Who is running the spyware/virus checks? Is the code 100% open source and reviewable? How do we verify the build isn't modified prior to installation?
Blockchain is cool, but there are so many problems left unsolved.
51% attacks are not possible on Ethereum. The network is far too large. If this were possible, the billions of dollars worth of assets secured on the network would quickly be stolen or become worthless.
Furthermore, not only would such an attack be immediately detected, it would necessarily be public. The miracle of such technology is that all votes can be verified by anyone without revealing anyone's vote. But any given voter can also verify that their vote was counted correctly.
It's hard to wrap your head around the potential. But understand that we are not talking about a mysql database.
If this were possible, the billions of dollars worth of assets secured on the network would quickly be stolen or become worthless.
Only if it is found to be worth the effort. If the NSA decides to spin up their Utah datacenter for a purpose, or Russia/China/Germany/etc. decides to do the same, you'll never see it coming.
The basic function of a blockchain is to make the data trustless so that anyone can run a node and the data is verified to be untampered. The security of a blockchain depends on a large number of distributed nodes. The effect is essentially to make security a function of hashpower or incentive structure.
Putting the data on a private government blockchain would only guarantee that the data can be manipulated and cannot be publicly verified, which is no better than any website.
Trustless is misused, even in blockchains. What a [distributed] blockchain does is:
“...minimize the amount of trust required from any single actor in the system.“
This use of “trustless” doesn’t apply to custom ledgers that assign verifying nodes, that is: are not distributed to anyone who wants to participate, such as Chy-Na would like to when it comes to our voting.
I get (now) why ‘trustless’ is used: there is no need to verify the identities (nor the entities behind them) of the parties in the transaction nor worry about them following through on a transaction.
That is: when a browser encrypts a site it verifies that a centralized authority issued a site’s certificate.
If we cared about our vote, we would take care of voter fraud. Period. Only citizens can vote. Period. America is special and we should always protect it.
Imagine, even if not the perfect voter ID system, Trump simply says "ok, we can do voter ID. We'll mail every registered voter a voter ID. Anyone not registered can vote in person or by provisional ballot"
in 2017, the USPS applied for a provisional patent on a secure voting system using blockchain and voter ID.
Edit -> [For clarification, this isn't necessarily a physical ID]
In Feb 2019, they applied for another.
It was just revealed.
In effect, the system would give everyone a national voter ID. that would be matched to state level voting registrations.
Ballots would be created and the voter ID would be used to claim a ballot.
The registered voter would use their voter ID and the ballot to cast an anonymous, auditable, encrypted vote.
And they would do it by mail, but the USPS secure vote by mail system patent relied on voter ID.
With this revelation, the USPS might just be the vehicle to implement a national voter ID system, which makes total sense.
As well - the leverage this gives Trump against vote by mail is "we have a system that's been in development for 3 years, so if we're going to do vote by mail here's how the USPS would do it, we create a national voter ID database and match those to ballots, anonymously. No exposure to virus and it secures vote by mail."
It calls the Dem's bluff on vote by mail and if they backpeddle hard because it would be a vehicle to institute national voter ID, they'll look like idiots.
In 1983 Tom Zimmer in Loretto, Italy, spoke out a word from God that, "There is a man in the US, who is a genius, who will become President and lead America back to God. His name ...
goddamn not gonna lie they had me in the first half. i was legit worried. now i'm not worried at all. 4D chess my dudes. quite possibly an interdimensional play.
Plus, after the stimulus, they have a very up to date database.
Or, maybe it'd be as simple as going to the post office and showing your ID, and getting registered - and it'd match to your existing voter registration.
"Congratulations, you can vote by mail, here's your ballot"
They shrieked about how “voting in person will kill you” but there is no appetite for voting by mail.
So, if anything, Dems suppressed their own base. Those people won’t vote by mail, and may sit this one out.
Alternatively, they know there is absentee voting (which is possibly more secure than voting in person.) They can use that if they’re that afraid of voting in person.
When I try to search online for this patent with the term 'USPA 2020/0258338 A1" all I get is a blog in Japanese or something. Where can we confirm this patent exists? I tried a search on the US patent site and OFC it says not found. I suspect I am simply not using the right search form?
This would have been before corona so I’m guessing it’s not about voter id in any fashion.
Any mail in voting scheme will result in a Trump loss or a contested outcome. We’re basically fucked either way, but at least there won’t be a reason to stand down any longer.
As someone else pointed out - I think just the threat of flipping vote by mail into a national voter ID system will cause Democrats to flip their shit, in a very public way.
I'm posting it where hard lefties will see it - calling it the USPS Vote By Mail National Voter ID Blockchain system.
LOL.
Saying "hey, this could work! We should do this. Let's people vote by mail who don't want to risk exposure to COVID, AND it secures the vote by mail process from fraud!"
They're all silent (but probably watching Dementia national convention).
Well, don’t leave us in suspense. What groups, specifically? Us righties like to know so we don’t support racist extremists and the groups they a associate with.
"A voting system can use the security of blockchain and the mail to provide a reliable voting system," the patent application says. "A registered voter receives a computer readable code in the mail and confirms identity and confirms correct ballot information in an election. The system separates voter identification and votes to ensure vote anonymity, and stores votes on a distributed ledger in a blockchain."
This is not voter ID. Anyone who has a drivers license will be on the registry. They will vote just the same as they are now by way of the “motor voter” laws.
It sends registered voters a code. That’s your identity. Dead grandma can still get a code and anyone willing to break the law could use it. All the illegals who are given drivers licenses will be on the registry and get a code.
This patent ensures correct counting as it separates the personal info from the vote tally. It doesn’t get a photo or thumbprint verification to verify eligibility. If you’re on the role, you get a code. True voter ID would require a picture be taken and used at the time of voting. This would make it a lot harder to cheat, especially if the ID requires proof of citizenship.
Anything less, IMO, is more conditioning of our minds to accept permanent mail-in voting.
If this is accurate, I may start sharing the sentiment some already have--that Trump is divinely inspired.
Welcome to a walk with God.
Yup makes a man look genius
To others it seems like foreknowledge when your intuition is in line with the King of the universe.
He isn't God, but could CERTAINLY be divinely inspired.
Thats what it is to Abide in His Light. Everything becomes surreal in the most mystical way possible. He's a sinner like us.
Praise. Trump must ask Him every day "if it is Your will father, let it be done."
Maybe one day once he’s finished we will find out! His books will be awesome.
Kim Clement spoke of Trump February 22, 2014.
I'm not a Christian but holy hell this was unreal to listen to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh2hfbcPjOw
I was going to click out of the video near the beginning after the Trump part, but I decided to watch the whole thing and am glad I did. Lots of Trump in that video, but the whole video was amazing.. Thanks for sharing that.
February 10, 2007
April 4th, 2007
Chills.... honestly... like I said, I'm not religious.. but this really makes you think. Especially how Trump has become much more religious the past 4 years.
Being religious is stupid. Had little to do with being an actual Christian.
Christ sort of pooped all over the "religious" in his time.
You should check out Jesus. Cool guy. N
I follow religion because of the values it teaches but what I mean is that I don't really dive into prophecies and superstitions and that sort of thing. I'm probably the most agnostic religious person there is. I believe there is tremendous value in believing and practicing religion, but more of me believes that the "visions" all the people in the bible had and all the stories came from early humans tripping the fuck out on mushrooms and acacia.
I believe that God is using Trump to combat literal demons in Washington D.C.
I use to think such talk was crazy (even as a Christian) but the behavior of Trump’s enemies has all convinced me otherwise.
Im still convinced hes a time traveller
GEOTUS for a reason!
God Emperor of the United States or God's Emperor of the United States. Either way, he's still GEOTUS!
Lots of concern trolls out tonight pushing the same bs as usually, at least they picked a better generic name like "Proud American" to push blackpilled 8chan shit instead of random numbers and letters like yesterday lmao
ya check out his comments....mostly glowy race bait.
What did I miss yesterday?
some glowies, some people are just getting fed up / have had bad experiences with BLM and Antifa.
They have created more racists in a few months than anyone in history.
BLM made a lot of people race aware, that and some people have direct experience with racial discrimination and the hatred towards them.
It's hard to walk the line between being honest about race issues and not be perceived as a "racist", but diplomacy is the only way to avoid violence and so we have to be able to talk about things honestly.
No. That would have been Obummer.
Yes, but not quite as fast.
Some people are taken NG their anger at the blm crowd and aiming it at all black people. This is exactly what the deep state want. If you pay attention, a large majority of the violent blm movement are white, not black.
I have seen that - lots of stuff I wished I could downvote.
You can deport...
I try and use that sparingly, as it can get one banned.
Yes thats the point.
...you’ve come to the wrong saloon partner...
Or seeing savages act like animals makes one reconsider "immoral" race realism
Certainly, the animal is not at fault for its' baser instincts, but that doesnt mean you treat a copperhead with love and affection in hopes it won't bite you. You stay the fuck away.
Wow. Very active and angsty. Life will be here years after you make your emotional mistakes.
True this
Agreed. Very Weird!
Blockchain isn't foolproof, and in fact could make cheating easier. Basically if a majority of all the computers that host ledgers agree with a result, then that result is considered "true".
But who controls the computers where the ledgers are stored?!
In theory, someone who controlled enough nodes in the network could forge an incorrect result and then force the rest of the network to accept it as "true".
We'd be replacing the Electoral College with computers. This is a nightmare.
Not necessarily.
The only national piece could be the national voter registry.
Then, each county's post office could host the ledger, along with the cities and counties and state.
Such fraud would be extremely easy to identify, and in litigation (inevitable in such a circumstance) the ledger could be verified.
You could also allow individual citizen's to host the ledger as well. Obfuscate the voter but make the vote public.
The post offices run by liberal unions are going to host a server with only a single field guy in the regional office who has the slightest idea how to operate it? That doesn't sound ripe for fraud... Who is running the spyware/virus checks? Is the code 100% open source and reviewable? How do we verify the build isn't modified prior to installation?
Blockchain is cool, but there are so many problems left unsolved.
Set up correctly this could be the most secure form of voting possible with current technology.
Everyone had the same concern about Bitcoin and it is still going strong.
yes because fools dont realize bitcoin HAS a backdoor and was invented in langley what in the 1940s...
folks getting played ...we owe trump 4 years
shut this one down and give him his first proper four
It does? How does that work on a decentralized blockchain? Genuinely curious
i think it was bill binney or american intelligence media who first exposed the back door to bitcoin
i do beleive it was tommie williams who recently mentioned it was actually developed in the 40s post ww2
everything we have been told is true is fake fake fake
Yeah, but WHICH flavor/fork of Bitcoin is actually going strong and suitable for a task like this?
None.
Bitcoin is just one example of blockchain usage.
Voting with a blockchain would have nothing to do with the Bitcoin blockchain.
Fair enough. As long as the code is open and can be reviewed by anyone, it could be doable.
Block chain is the next big technology like the internet. Bitcoin and all its flavors are just like early websites.
51% attacks are not possible on Ethereum. The network is far too large. If this were possible, the billions of dollars worth of assets secured on the network would quickly be stolen or become worthless.
Furthermore, not only would such an attack be immediately detected, it would necessarily be public. The miracle of such technology is that all votes can be verified by anyone without revealing anyone's vote. But any given voter can also verify that their vote was counted correctly.
It's hard to wrap your head around the potential. But understand that we are not talking about a mysql database.
Only if it is found to be worth the effort. If the NSA decides to spin up their Utah datacenter for a purpose, or Russia/China/Germany/etc. decides to do the same, you'll never see it coming.
Government and academic data centers are orders of magnitude smaller than the top three blockchains. It's not even close.
I don't think you understand how blockchain works.
It can be as permission as you want it to be. You think they'd let anybody run a node?
The basic function of a blockchain is to make the data trustless so that anyone can run a node and the data is verified to be untampered. The security of a blockchain depends on a large number of distributed nodes. The effect is essentially to make security a function of hashpower or incentive structure.
Putting the data on a private government blockchain would only guarantee that the data can be manipulated and cannot be publicly verified, which is no better than any website.
But if anybody can run a node, that's how you get the wrong side with nodes and claiming fraud where one exists.
A 51% attack is not possible on any of the top blockchains. They are far too large.
No. That’s not the purpose of any part of distributed ledgers and blockchains.
No elaboration? I can do this too.
I'm right. You're wrong. QED
Trustless is misused, even in blockchains. What a [distributed] blockchain does is:
This use of “trustless” doesn’t apply to custom ledgers that assign verifying nodes, that is: are not distributed to anyone who wants to participate, such as Chy-Na would like to when it comes to our voting.
The term is also employed in describing extremely low-trust systems.
https://vitalik.ca/general/2020/08/20/trust.html
Thanks for that link.
I get (now) why ‘trustless’ is used: there is no need to verify the identities (nor the entities behind them) of the parties in the transaction nor worry about them following through on a transaction.
That is: when a browser encrypts a site it verifies that a centralized authority issued a site’s certificate.
No, I don't think they'd let just anybody run a node. But how do we know we can trust the people who are running them?
This system seems like it would totally eliminate the paper trail for voting and that makes me very uncomfortable.
locked servers, in local courthouses, deployed to counties by the Fed/election committee. Only those authorised by the committee can direct access.
The most that anyone else (including those who guard the servers) can do is turn them on or off.
you don't need a paper trail in blockchain. The exact same functionality exists in digital form.
If sufficiently distributed, it should be nearly impossible to corrupt even with nation-state level resources.
I'm convinced Trump has a plan. This may not be it, but it feels like he's baiting the Dems.
Agreed.
Trump’s like “These people must think I have a grand plan... Fuck I hope they go vote.”
I don't think he's like that at all, in fact, I know he's not like how you stated.
If we cared about our vote, we would take care of voter fraud. Period. Only citizens can vote. Period. America is special and we should always protect it.
Exactly.
Imagine, even if not the perfect voter ID system, Trump simply says "ok, we can do voter ID. We'll mail every registered voter a voter ID. Anyone not registered can vote in person or by provisional ballot"
The Dems would shit the bed.
in 2017, the USPS applied for a provisional patent on a secure voting system using blockchain and voter ID.
Edit -> [For clarification, this isn't necessarily a physical ID]
In Feb 2019, they applied for another.
It was just revealed.
In effect, the system would give everyone a national voter ID. that would be matched to state level voting registrations.
Ballots would be created and the voter ID would be used to claim a ballot.
The registered voter would use their voter ID and the ballot to cast an anonymous, auditable, encrypted vote.
And they would do it by mail, but the USPS secure vote by mail system patent relied on voter ID.
With this revelation, the USPS might just be the vehicle to implement a national voter ID system, which makes total sense.
As well - the leverage this gives Trump against vote by mail is "we have a system that's been in development for 3 years, so if we're going to do vote by mail here's how the USPS would do it, we create a national voter ID database and match those to ballots, anonymously. No exposure to virus and it secures vote by mail."
It calls the Dem's bluff on vote by mail and if they backpeddle hard because it would be a vehicle to institute national voter ID, they'll look like idiots.
This comment should be stickied in this comment section. Thanks for the ELI5
I love the idea, but to roll it out right before an election would be asking for a nightmare.
I think the threat would be enough
Wrong
Why?
They’ll look like idiots AND we vote in person.
https://thedonald.win/p/Gv1hcO96/x/c/15IrPdbKMd
I do too - if for no other reason than watching the Democrats try to unravel the past 3 weeks of conspiracy theories.
Cant wait to find out more!
Quick! Someone check behind the White House for a DeLoreon
In 1983 Tom Zimmer in Loretto, Italy, spoke out a word from God that, "There is a man in the US, who is a genius, who will become President and lead America back to God. His name ...
Donald J. Trump."
Check this guy out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh2hfbcPjOw
goddamn not gonna lie they had me in the first half. i was legit worried. now i'm not worried at all. 4D chess my dudes. quite possibly an interdimensional play.
As someone else pointed out - this is huge leverage against the Dems.
"Vote by mail? Well, let's add national voter ID, and that way it's secure and safe.
We have a way to do it.
Everybody is happy."
They just sent checks out.
Give every us citizen an ID; registered or not.
Still have to register be registered to vote (according the patent) - it uses the voter registration roles at the state level.
True - unless they're ready?
Plus, after the stimulus, they have a very up to date database.
Or, maybe it'd be as simple as going to the post office and showing your ID, and getting registered - and it'd match to your existing voter registration.
"Congratulations, you can vote by mail, here's your ballot"
I think the Dems goofed.
They shrieked about how “voting in person will kill you” but there is no appetite for voting by mail.
So, if anything, Dems suppressed their own base. Those people won’t vote by mail, and may sit this one out.
Alternatively, they know there is absentee voting (which is possibly more secure than voting in person.) They can use that if they’re that afraid of voting in person.
If this is true, I would imagine most of the work has already been done.
True if big.
4D chess
Could someone ELI5 this for me?
Someone else asked for an ELI5 - replied -
https://thedonald.win/p/Gv1hcO96/x/c/15IrPdbKMd
When I try to search online for this patent with the term 'USPA 2020/0258338 A1" all I get is a blog in Japanese or something. Where can we confirm this patent exists? I tried a search on the US patent site and OFC it says not found. I suspect I am simply not using the right search form?
The political leverage could be very useful.
I don’t think the plan would be to actually use it. Maybe more to expose the hypocrisy of the dems and make them look like retards
this is the way he works so it is definitely a possibility
I do t understand what any of this means
9000D chess
Whats crazy is I went to get tabs and eye exam at DMV, the guy told me we're getting national IDs like 2 years ago. That's when he was first told
You never want your first run of a software platform to be something as important as a national election.
Far better to have numerous local and state election trials first.
Didn’t Virginia test something in 2018?
Wonder if it was this.
I don't know, but it would be interesting if they did.
I plan to repost this thread.
https://twitter.com/Colo5DGuy/status/1295479430886887430/photo/1
Nice try. No.
I think it could work, personally.
What? "you guys" - ELI5
This would have been before corona so I’m guessing it’s not about voter id in any fashion.
Any mail in voting scheme will result in a Trump loss or a contested outcome. We’re basically fucked either way, but at least there won’t be a reason to stand down any longer.
As someone else pointed out - I think just the threat of flipping vote by mail into a national voter ID system will cause Democrats to flip their shit, in a very public way.
I'm posting it where hard lefties will see it - calling it the USPS Vote By Mail National Voter ID Blockchain system.
LOL.
Saying "hey, this could work! We should do this. Let's people vote by mail who don't want to risk exposure to COVID, AND it secures the vote by mail process from fraud!"
They're all silent (but probably watching Dementia national convention).
Ah the glowie from 4chan.
u can spot them not only because of the glow. but the fact he doesn't know pedes are against racists.
They go so overboard with the usernames it comes off as "How you doing fellow caterpillars?"
Fun fact a lot of the racist “far right” groups are supported by Soros and other outside interests.
They hate when you point this out.
Well, don’t leave us in suspense. What groups, specifically? Us righties like to know so we don’t support racist extremists and the groups they a associate with.
It doesn't work without Voter ID.
"A voting system can use the security of blockchain and the mail to provide a reliable voting system," the patent application says. "A registered voter receives a computer readable code in the mail and confirms identity and confirms correct ballot information in an election. The system separates voter identification and votes to ensure vote anonymity, and stores votes on a distributed ledger in a blockchain."
This is not voter ID. Anyone who has a drivers license will be on the registry. They will vote just the same as they are now by way of the “motor voter” laws.
Check the illustrations - it's tied into voter registrations at state and national level, and a voter database.
The process says the voter has to verify their identity.
It doesn't say voter ID, but accomplishes the same thing.
It sends registered voters a code. That’s your identity. Dead grandma can still get a code and anyone willing to break the law could use it. All the illegals who are given drivers licenses will be on the registry and get a code.
This patent ensures correct counting as it separates the personal info from the vote tally. It doesn’t get a photo or thumbprint verification to verify eligibility. If you’re on the role, you get a code. True voter ID would require a picture be taken and used at the time of voting. This would make it a lot harder to cheat, especially if the ID requires proof of citizenship.
Anything less, IMO, is more conditioning of our minds to accept permanent mail-in voting.
Welp - I'm going to keep calling it a national voter ID vote by mail system to trigger leftists. :)
👍