15
Comments (4)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
JigglesV 2 points ago +2 / -0

We already have high speed space travel crafts ready to go, that's what the Pentagon was leaking. This achievement is why Trump instantiated the US Space Force. Elon Musk (and to a lesser extent, Richard Branson) is part of the first commercialization of such advanced technology, allowed by DoD, USAF, and Space Force.

.

The spaceport resort is a huge step in the adoption of space travel and the acceptance that humanity is now a space-faring civilization!

yay!! (At least I wish this was true)

1
Aambrick [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know that building a Mass driver to send raw materials to space would cost total $1.5 Trillion-$2.5 Trillion, but that is the overall life time cost. Should be able to build a 6-10 mile one for $150 Billion in a 8 year period with a dedicated power system and source(I prefer the Nuclear Thorium-MSR type, but any Reactor would do the trick since 1-2 GW power source with a 700 MW discharge capacity should get it to the ISS station level[safe side would be 2-4 Gw with 1.2 Gw discharge capacity]).

Vacuuming it, and using a plasma window is very doable right now under $400 Billion. If designed properly should last 30 years. If designed to send a 20 Kg payload every 2 minutes that is about 600 Kg/h(14,400 Kg/day) with an operational period of 4-5 days a week with the other 2 used as inspection days. 907 Kg is the near = to 1 ton so 14,400 Kg would be around 17.5-18 tons weekly. Take down several weeks of the year to do a full inspection and repairs/replacement schedule which could account to 2-3 months. So lets say 30 weeks of operation per year then that would equal to 525-540 tons yearly.

That is only for 1. With the amount suggested that could be upped to 3-4 times so yeah. It has nothing to do with money, engineering, or anything else other than politics.