2380
Comments (75)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
55
AnnoyedSoPosting 55 points ago +58 / -3

Yes, but please don't start that Tulsi support bullshit again.

44
deleted 44 points ago +51 / -7
5
siliconia 5 points ago +5 / -0

I support the same for myself as well. I would even let Hassan Rouhani watch in the corner.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
26
Mac3 26 points ago +28 / -2

Seriously, though, if dems wanted to have the best chance of winning they would pick a moderate with some actual character like Tulsi. I would be scared for Trumps re-election if she was the nominee. Would pull in a lot of moderates and obviously any liberal will just vote for the democrat candidate. I just think she isn’t corrupt enough to get the support of the DNC.

16
Juanye 16 points ago +18 / -2

Tulsi is not a moderate. Her ideology is as radical as anyone at the dnc. Just because she doesn’t call everyone opposing her LiTeRaL NaZIs...

2
forcedaspiration 2 points ago +6 / -4

I think she is the definition of a moderate. Shes def not radical. Not saying she has my confidence to run shit, but she is better that your typical run of the mill shit lib if you have to be honest here.

10
FireannDireach 10 points ago +10 / -0

She is NOT a moderate. She pushed for a lot of socialist policies. She may have been glomming onto hot Dem topics for attention, and never intended to pursue them if elected, but she is not moderate. Warren, for all of her bullshit, is WAY more moderate, especially when it comes to finance and the economy. You also have to take a look at who she represents, and her track record in Hawaii - she's maintained the liberal plantation there quite efficiently. She's all talk, when it comes to a lot of things. I took a serious look at her. She's got more going for her than all of the other dem nominees combined, but...well, a lot of it is superficial.

I think she needs another decade of experience before taking her seriously as a challenger. But even then, unless she does some biblical level ass smooching, the DNC will never support her. I'm betting she runs and wins as governor of Hawaii, then lets see how she does. She's got her work cut out for her there, running that island gibs nation.

4
1NPC1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://thedonald.win/p/GcH3jXV2/this-bitch-should-not-be-anywher/c/ Only thing good she says is to bring the troops home and anti-regime change wars.

2
Juanye 2 points ago +2 / -0

IMO banning guns, govt run medicine, 3rd trimester abortions are all pretty radical, would you agree? That’s just a few things. I mean seriously check out her page, it’s an SJW word salad.

Her only redeeming qualities are she is “antiwar” (although she has had some really bad ideas foreign policy) and pretty nice to look at.

5
Cyer6 5 points ago +5 / -0

Question still remains though, WHY do they hate Tulsi? If she is progressive left and I think she is, why didn't they vote for her? Why did they kill her campaign? I can't figure these SOB's out. These people make no sense to anyone with half a brain.

2
Greatest_adventure 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn't she sue Hillary Clinton for some act of defamation?

2
RishabhPanty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because she is a Hindu. If she was a radical Islamist or a member of Woko Haram then she would have been elected. Also maybe she isn’t totally corrupt to the core like Kamala.

10
TrumpRocks 10 points ago +12 / -2

To be fair, she was the only sane Democratic candidate. Still nowhere near as good as Trump, though.

6
Southboundanddown 6 points ago +6 / -0

No such thing.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
5
Snooch 5 points ago +10 / -5

no apologies. She is awesome.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0