I think she is the definition of a moderate. Shes def not radical. Not saying she has my confidence to run shit, but she is better that your typical run of the mill shit lib if you have to be honest here.
She is NOT a moderate. She pushed for a lot of socialist policies. She may have been glomming onto hot Dem topics for attention, and never intended to pursue them if elected, but she is not moderate. Warren, for all of her bullshit, is WAY more moderate, especially when it comes to finance and the economy. You also have to take a look at who she represents, and her track record in Hawaii - she's maintained the liberal plantation there quite efficiently. She's all talk, when it comes to a lot of things. I took a serious look at her. She's got more going for her than all of the other dem nominees combined, but...well, a lot of it is superficial.
I think she needs another decade of experience before taking her seriously as a challenger. But even then, unless she does some biblical level ass smooching, the DNC will never support her. I'm betting she runs and wins as governor of Hawaii, then lets see how she does. She's got her work cut out for her there, running that island gibs nation.
IMO banning guns, govt run medicine, 3rd trimester abortions are all pretty radical, would you agree? That’s just a few things. I mean seriously check out her page, it’s an SJW word salad.
Her only redeeming qualities are she is “antiwar” (although she has had some really bad ideas foreign policy) and pretty nice to look at.
Tulsi is not a moderate. Her ideology is as radical as anyone at the dnc. Just because she doesn’t call everyone opposing her LiTeRaL NaZIs...
I think she is the definition of a moderate. Shes def not radical. Not saying she has my confidence to run shit, but she is better that your typical run of the mill shit lib if you have to be honest here.
She is NOT a moderate. She pushed for a lot of socialist policies. She may have been glomming onto hot Dem topics for attention, and never intended to pursue them if elected, but she is not moderate. Warren, for all of her bullshit, is WAY more moderate, especially when it comes to finance and the economy. You also have to take a look at who she represents, and her track record in Hawaii - she's maintained the liberal plantation there quite efficiently. She's all talk, when it comes to a lot of things. I took a serious look at her. She's got more going for her than all of the other dem nominees combined, but...well, a lot of it is superficial.
I think she needs another decade of experience before taking her seriously as a challenger. But even then, unless she does some biblical level ass smooching, the DNC will never support her. I'm betting she runs and wins as governor of Hawaii, then lets see how she does. She's got her work cut out for her there, running that island gibs nation.
https://thedonald.win/p/GcH3jXV2/this-bitch-should-not-be-anywher/c/ Only thing good she says is to bring the troops home and anti-regime change wars.
IMO banning guns, govt run medicine, 3rd trimester abortions are all pretty radical, would you agree? That’s just a few things. I mean seriously check out her page, it’s an SJW word salad.
Her only redeeming qualities are she is “antiwar” (although she has had some really bad ideas foreign policy) and pretty nice to look at.