This is big news.. blockchain, if implemented correctly is impossible to alter without evidence. Trump played the Dems and MSM like a fiddle. Now watch them reverse course on mail in voting.
I guess that could possibly be an issue depending on how they collect the ballots, but quantum inset is used for inserting malware or stealing info. Unless I’m missing something.
So that hacker/middle man would have to fill out the ballot for the voter they hacked, or have some elaborate script to do it for them.
They wouldn’t/shouldn’t be able to change the vote (alter the blockchain) without leaving evidence.
This is big news.. blockchain, if implemented correctly is impossible to alter without evidence. Trump played the Dems and MSM like a fiddle. Now watch them reverse course on mail in voting.
What about quantum insert attacks?
I guess that could possibly be an issue depending on how they collect the ballots, but quantum inset is used for inserting malware or stealing info. Unless I’m missing something.
So that hacker/middle man would have to fill out the ballot for the voter they hacked, or have some elaborate script to do it for them.
They wouldn’t/shouldn’t be able to change the vote (alter the blockchain) without leaving evidence.
Point taken. Of course the question becomes, who would report and investigate the evidence once the election was over?
Winners count the votes.
I guess that’s where we trust GEOTUS has a plan. The based postmaster general will certainly help.