4988
Comments (406)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
18
fapoo 18 points ago +18 / -0

"We've already put 'shall not be infringed', how much clearer do we need to make it?"

7
stratocaster_patriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

Apparently a lot more clear. Our enemies are expert at obfuscation. Most of them are merely retarded.

4
unable_afternoon 4 points ago +4 / -0

There’s no getting around the fact that rights don’t defend themselves. People just want to come up with some scenario where words on a piece of paper can magically protect them from tyranny.

The second amendment is a line in the sand. That’s it. A line in the sand doesn’t stop people from crossing. it only signifies a point at which action is to be taken. If you’re never going to take action anyways then it doesn’t matter where the line is placed because you won’t do anything regardless.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0