Dude no kidding. Slavery was bad for black people but also bad for this country both in the past and in the future. Two races of people suffered heavily for that practice although to be fair it was already part of black culture so at the end of the day the US got the worst of it.
Aside from the moral implications of slavery, it wasn't beneficial economically for more than a very few people. It should have never been allowed and when it was abolished they should have been paid and sent back. The long-term effects have been disastrous.
That is so true, all of it. A few people got rich and benefited and today BLM is telling us they built this country. Yeah not even close. Not even capable.
Ottomans had slaves into 1900s. Middle East still have slaves. Africans and Asians as well. If Democrats didnt use slavery to manipulate people now, they woulda used something else. Slavery is not the issue. Every country used to have slaves, you dont see Norwegian Sami rioting or Australian Aboriginies.
Not saying slavery good or anything, but if they had eliminated it from the start, the Democrats would just be using something else to get a rize of people. Also if they had eliminated it from the start, the rich slave owners might've joined Brits instead. Washington also banned Americans from getting their own slaves, so all the slaves brought to the US after1776 was from other people.
But yeah, make a freedom country and not bann slavery is kinda nonsensical
To be honest I'd rather Dems fond something else to rile us up instead of having black people in our country who hate us and seem to hate themselves as well. Some of them are decent but in general out nation would be better had they never been here in the first place. We would still have some black immigrants that are of benefit to us.
Those handful of slave owners who would have sided with the British would not have had any power to significantly change the outcome. I mean it is something interesting to consider but I don't really see how that would be a game changer.
Dude no kidding. Slavery was bad for black people but also bad for this country both in the past and in the future. Two races of people suffered heavily for that practice although to be fair it was already part of black culture so at the end of the day the US got the worst of it.
Aside from the moral implications of slavery, it wasn't beneficial economically for more than a very few people. It should have never been allowed and when it was abolished they should have been paid and sent back. The long-term effects have been disastrous.
That is so true, all of it. A few people got rich and benefited and today BLM is telling us they built this country. Yeah not even close. Not even capable.
Ottomans had slaves into 1900s. Middle East still have slaves. Africans and Asians as well. If Democrats didnt use slavery to manipulate people now, they woulda used something else. Slavery is not the issue. Every country used to have slaves, you dont see Norwegian Sami rioting or Australian Aboriginies.
Not saying slavery good or anything, but if they had eliminated it from the start, the Democrats would just be using something else to get a rize of people. Also if they had eliminated it from the start, the rich slave owners might've joined Brits instead. Washington also banned Americans from getting their own slaves, so all the slaves brought to the US after1776 was from other people.
But yeah, make a freedom country and not bann slavery is kinda nonsensical
To be honest I'd rather Dems fond something else to rile us up instead of having black people in our country who hate us and seem to hate themselves as well. Some of them are decent but in general out nation would be better had they never been here in the first place. We would still have some black immigrants that are of benefit to us.
Those handful of slave owners who would have sided with the British would not have had any power to significantly change the outcome. I mean it is something interesting to consider but I don't really see how that would be a game changer.