Arguing about the size of the arms is NOT the intent of the Second Amendment. That is the argument of the Left. It is the argument of enslavement to argue that the 2A excludes weapons beyond a certain range.
The intent of the Second Amendment is to allow the average citizen with the means to arm up as comparably as any cartel or government could bring to bear upon the individual, to curtail crime, tyranny, and foreign invasion.
At the very minimum, the 2A guarantees the average citizen ought to be equipped as well as the average soldier of the nation of the time. Think of what weapon systems the average infantrymen have at their fingertips today - that's supposed to be citizen MILITIA level equipping.
Now, go back and read some history.
Most of the ship warfare in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 was done through...private warships.
Most of the artillery used up to the Civil War was...privately owned. Many towns combined their private funds and had cannon forged for them...for private militia usage. Many wealthy had their own supply of cannon.
So, yes, the 2A declares the citizen with the means ought to be able to procure those weapon systems any modern government can bring to bear upon that citizen.
Since our dear Democrat Presidential Candidate Swalwell declared he'd nuke gun owning societies...then it bears the intent of the 2A is to have the citizen be able to bring equal firepower against the would-be tyrants.
Swalwell would not have spouted those stupid words off so quickly, were nuclear arms owned by certain scattered wealthy across the States.
If our government can bring the weapon to bear upon us...then the 2A says we should be able to balance that terror with an equal one of the citizen's own.
The 2A covers everything from the slightest airgun to the ICBM, and beyond to the most powerful futuristic weapons systems only envisioned in Sci-Fi games and shows today.
I created my first account here when it came up, but forgot my password.
I have several long lasting accounts from the original The Donald subreddit, including under this same name (with an obvious underscore where one is not).
So why don't you shut the fuck up like the bitch you are instead of trying to push me into silence because baby can't have a nuclear weapon.
Cry me a river. You will never get your hands on one, because only the most hard-line supporters will die on the hill of a fucking nuke. Almost no one else supports that notion.
Don't bitch at me; bitch at Einstein.
I wouldn't bother responding anymore; I can only suffer retardism a certain amount, and I hit that quota every day from the left upon waking up.
Go sit on the stick up your ass some more.
Quick edit: You keep going through my history and downvoting posts as if anyone cares about karma. I got more karma from The_Donald on Reddit than I could ever care about. It didn't matter then, and it doesn't matter now.
But you behave just like a leftist, and it's cute.
Arguing about the size of the arms is NOT the intent of the Second Amendment. That is the argument of the Left. It is the argument of enslavement to argue that the 2A excludes weapons beyond a certain range.
The intent of the Second Amendment is to allow the average citizen with the means to arm up as comparably as any cartel or government could bring to bear upon the individual, to curtail crime, tyranny, and foreign invasion.
At the very minimum, the 2A guarantees the average citizen ought to be equipped as well as the average soldier of the nation of the time. Think of what weapon systems the average infantrymen have at their fingertips today - that's supposed to be citizen MILITIA level equipping.
Now, go back and read some history.
Most of the ship warfare in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 was done through...private warships.
Most of the artillery used up to the Civil War was...privately owned. Many towns combined their private funds and had cannon forged for them...for private militia usage. Many wealthy had their own supply of cannon.
So, yes, the 2A declares the citizen with the means ought to be able to procure those weapon systems any modern government can bring to bear upon that citizen.
Since our dear Democrat Presidential Candidate Swalwell declared he'd nuke gun owning societies...then it bears the intent of the 2A is to have the citizen be able to bring equal firepower against the would-be tyrants.
Swalwell would not have spouted those stupid words off so quickly, were nuclear arms owned by certain scattered wealthy across the States.
If our government can bring the weapon to bear upon us...then the 2A says we should be able to balance that terror with an equal one of the citizen's own.
The 2A covers everything from the slightest airgun to the ICBM, and beyond to the most powerful futuristic weapons systems only envisioned in Sci-Fi games and shows today.
See, you are the stupid person that I was talking about above and now I get to point you out.
Comparing warships to a nuclear weapon is stupid.
I know my history; you are just a retard who wants to measure the size of his dick with the number of people that can be killed with one button push.
No, nuclear weapons should never be owned by private citizens and their creation was a mistake.
Stop preaching to me, bitch. Own any gun you want. Fuck, own anti-air and RPGs, I don't care.
But you can suck a fat dick if you want to own a nuclear or chemical weapon.
Hmmmm.....a newbie here, whose first words in reply are Ad Hominems.
No intelligent rebuttal - just claim the argument is "stupid", and go back to your Ad Hominems.
Go back and sit at the childrens' table, until you get some cogent thoughts and courtesy habits.
"A newbie here"
I created my first account here when it came up, but forgot my password.
I have several long lasting accounts from the original The Donald subreddit, including under this same name (with an obvious underscore where one is not).
So why don't you shut the fuck up like the bitch you are instead of trying to push me into silence because baby can't have a nuclear weapon.
Cry me a river. You will never get your hands on one, because only the most hard-line supporters will die on the hill of a fucking nuke. Almost no one else supports that notion.
Don't bitch at me; bitch at Einstein.
I wouldn't bother responding anymore; I can only suffer retardism a certain amount, and I hit that quota every day from the left upon waking up.
Go sit on the stick up your ass some more.
Quick edit: You keep going through my history and downvoting posts as if anyone cares about karma. I got more karma from The_Donald on Reddit than I could ever care about. It didn't matter then, and it doesn't matter now.
But you behave just like a leftist, and it's cute.