278
Comments (36)
sorted by:
18
Greenetarpaulin 18 points ago +18 / -0

William Aldenburg.

“An apt metaphor except….

I didn’t give them puzzle pieces, I gave special investigator William Aldenberg the fully assembled puzzle.”

9
Covfefe_Injection 9 points ago +9 / -0

Is this guy the real deal? Swamp? Need to dig.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
11
BasedTexasCPA 11 points ago +11 / -0

Search result i got was FBI agent at Sandy Hook that joined in lawsuit against Alex Jones...

9
nmipede [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

I already started:

The Financial Fraud and Public Corruption Unit Award was presented to FBI Special Agents William Aldenberg, Stacy Bowery, Matthew McPhillips and Jeffrey Waterman, whose investigative efforts led to the successful prosecution of eight individuals who engaged in a scheme to direct illegal contributions into the campaign of a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/connecticut-us-attorney-s-office-celebrates-annual-us-attorney-s-awards

Spez: more details on this -

https://www.ctpost.com/local/article/FBI-staked-out-Democrats-5th-CD-convention-3625957.php

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/federal-and-state-officials-promote-telephone-hotline-reporting-election-fraud-and-voting

Also, Sandy Hook related: http://www.sandyhookfacts.com/2016/01/fbi-not-actors-response-to-identity.html

Huge thread here from a debunker, both sides of the argument represented in the comments: https://www.crisisactorsguild.com/2018/11/05/did-sandy-hook-parent-david-wheeler-play-an-fbi-agent-on-december-14th-2012/

More spez, big Mexico crack cocaine ring bust, involved wiretaps: https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-2005-02-02-0502020018-story.html

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1534761.html

8
Greenetarpaulin 8 points ago +8 / -0

I’m looking now. Sundance still hasn’t fully outlined what he found.

19
goingbigly 19 points ago +19 / -0

And he likely won’t. Aldenberg now knows what Sundance has and what Sundance can present to the public if he doesn’t do his job. Try to cover something up? Sundance releases it. Try to sugar coat a part? Sundance releases the entire part with full context. He is now forced to do his job.

9
Samuel_L_Bronkowitz 9 points ago +9 / -0

I like this

7
nmipede [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sundance watches the watchers.

4
TakingCoatsWIN 4 points ago +4 / -0

What do you mean? He's been outlining it for years. What he gave Aldenberg was the same spygate things he's been writing about since 2017. In a concise matter for investigative consumption. What Sundance has said is he will reveal Durham's lead investigator if no big developments were done by Friday. And he did that, so we can keep their feet to the fire.

18
Saluboy 18 points ago +18 / -0

Sundance with the all too rare, "fulfill your promise," move.

This guy...motherfucking this guy...

God bless theconservativetreehouse. God bless Sundance.

7
REE_WUZ_KINGz 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can you explain this shit to a dumb Pede out of the loop? I follow Sundance's work here and there but am not sure what this all means

15
nmipede [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

To paraphrase, Sundance has been talking with most of the investigators. Each has access to only a portion of the whole picture (compartmentalization of classified data). Sundance has correlated times, dates and statements to take each of the puzzle pieces from the individual investigators and assemble them into a much clearer picture.

He gave that to Aldenberg today, and now we all know Altenberg has it, so Sundance can now hold some feet to the fire and make sure the truth is being told.

No arrests or prosecutions yet, but it's more than we had a few hours ago and exactly what Sundance promised.

7
REE_WUZ_KINGz 7 points ago +7 / -0

Appreciate the explanation. Big shit if true. I guess time will tell.

6
sunnyingreenfield 6 points ago +6 / -0

It seemed to me that the documents provided to James Wolfe (and then to his side-piece Ali of the NYT) play a big part to this. IIRC they were dated differently than the original source documents, and done so to help identify leakers, which they were. Sundance picked up on this discrepancy, and has brought it up regularly. Wolfe and Ali leaking the documents (FISA warrant, maybe?) is a key part in unraveling all of this. This may have been one of the key events that set off the "Russia Investigation".

It will be interesting (but not surprising) to see how long it takes any of the media to run with any of this.

SD has maintained that all of the evidence is irrefutable, and already in the public sphere, hence, his growing frustration.

Hoping it's legit, and produces the results we have been waiting for.

1
nmipede [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

You've been paying more attention to this than me. Hope it's legit and productive as well. Complicated business.

Appreciate you filling in more of the background, fren.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
REE_WUZ_KINGz 4 points ago +4 / -0

well shit, from your lips to god's ears man! Thanks

4
Tuber 4 points ago +4 / -0

"The media, who I have briefed on the material, have been released from any/all prior confidences. Additionally, I have released the name of the primary investigator (deep behind the Durham probe) to the same media. If those media voices do nothing, I will share who they are… until then, I grant them benefit of courage and patriotism."

I am hopeful. He's all about sunlight being the best disinfectant, so hopefully some critical media attention will spur a little action. The BS that showed up on TD earlier about Durham being "the least political person I know" was probably just priming for us all to accept a huge nothingburger. But if the full puzzle has already been put together, Durham looks like an incompetent idiot if his investigation has no findings of wrongdoing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +6 / -5
12
nmipede [S] 12 points ago +16 / -4

You have no idea what's going on and no one has a duty to inform you, me or any of us. Something is in motion now. Either exercise some restraint or go black pill in someone else's submission.

1
fazzman23 1 point ago +1 / -0

wait. i dont follow either. are we happy or mad right now?? (lol)

2
nmipede [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm pleased that he did what he said he would do. Others wanted a plane to Gitmo today, I guess, but they weren't paying any attention to what was supposed to happen - and for once it did.

1
iouybiy 1 point ago +3 / -2

This is what he was blueballing everyone over? Jeez.

9
nmipede [S] 9 points ago +10 / -1

You didn't read the blog, did you? What did you expect? We all knew it would be the lead investigator's name days ago. He delivered what he promised and there will be more to come.

1
iouybiy 1 point ago +2 / -1

You’re right, this changes everything.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +6 / -7
8
nmipede [S] 8 points ago +10 / -2

It's actually exactly what he promised. We've known what was coming for days, just not who. Maybe you should pay more attention.

6
TakingCoatsWIN 6 points ago +6 / -0

He said he was gonna release the name of Durham's lead investigator... he did that.

-3
Nadlers_Belt -3 points ago +4 / -7

Sundance is still tick-tocking.

He is always qanon-like generalizing and code-speaking.

And the conservative treehouse admins censor and shadow ban worse than twitter and facebook.

5
TakingCoatsWIN 5 points ago +6 / -1

That's bullshit. He did exactly what he said he would, which was release the name of Durham's lead investigator if there were no big developments by Friday. There was no generalizing or code speak.

0
Nadlers_Belt 0 points ago +1 / -1

He promised the name of someone very close to the President.

2
TakingCoatsWIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are you talking about? When was this? And about what?

2
nmipede [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

Then why pay any attention to it at all? Isn't there a new TimCast with fresh mauve pills for you?

3
Nadlers_Belt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I joined the treehouse way back during the Trayvon Martin scam. I have been a regular contributor and poster ever since. Sundance Cracker (that was his name back then) even gave me a hat tip mention for uncovering a key piece of evidence in an article he wrote.

A couple of weeks ago I got banned for reposting a meme from here of Barr getting yelled at to just arrest somebody.

There were several instances, in recent months, of Sundance code-talking and tick-tocking.

2
nmipede [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh. How sad for you. Goodbye.