1226
Comments (10)
sorted by:
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
Bramble 6 points ago +6 / -0

We need one of those GDPR laws about censorship.

Censor someone on a free public platform for anything but illegal behavior and lose 4% of your revenue.

4
PosterIsDead 4 points ago +4 / -0

Candace is great. I've loved her since her Stamford, CT days.

3
joemalarkey 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's a private company though?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
thebigbear 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK, need to look at reality. You sue because you were wronged and what was done was against the law. People break laws every day but they know don't do the crime if you can not do the time. This is just a case of "Portland Plague" of the those charged with enforcing the law are not doing it. HENCE, you have to go over those speed bumps and SUE above them( the people that gave them their job). Once, you start affecting the life style and happiness of those individuals they will have to weigh their actions. ACTIONS are ACCOUNTABLE. Less talk more walk. SUE SUE SUE. iF WRONGED THEN FIX IT.

1
DrinkMoreWater 1 point ago +1 / -0

DOOOO ITTT

1
orange_dit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a solution for the problem of fact checkers: Let fact checkers respond in the comments like everyone else. You can have multiple fact checkers that disagree and that is fine. Experts often do not agree.

And to people saying BuT iT's A pRiVaTe CoMpAnY: They get many tax breaks and government exemptions and they violate their own terms, which can be seen as a contract with their users. They are breaking moral laws, legal laws and their own terms. They are a monopoly that actively suppresses competition. They should be held accountable.