19
Comments (7)
sorted by:
2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never understood why they needed that window to be as large as it is. All it should show is a barcode that simply marks the ballot as "received" in the system. There should be NO identifiable markings anywhere on it.

2
Schiffblower 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the logical explanation is that it’s a primary and easier to sort by party

If used in the general tho, fuckery is afoot

1
KekRaider1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuckery is afoot. We KNOW this. TheDonald is the PROOF of all the fuckery afoot. We are the repository of Proof of all FUCKASSism, I mean, Communism afoot in this country. Do NOT stand idly by and allow an inch of moral ground in any argument with any liberal on any subject ever. That’s what got us here. We’ve always given inch after inch to liberals and they always take a mile. Now they WILL take the field if we don’t stop them

1
Mrs_Fonebone [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Maybe...

2
Schiffblower 2 points ago +2 / -0

Definitely is going to be watched in the general. Problem now is, the officials know we’re watching so they’ll put a number or range of numbers that will be the identifier

2
latetotheparty 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would think that this would be a fertile field to plant an EO which simply says no ballot returned by mail shall give any visible external evidence of party registration or affiliation. Period. (this problem is not isolated to Palm Beach Co.)

2
KekRaider1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why are we allowing communism to fester in this country at all? You wouldn’t allow your leg to grow gangrenous.

My frens, it is time to amputate