2148
Comments (39)
sorted by:
50
DebbieinDallas 50 points ago +50 / -0

Good for him. I am not an anti-vaxxer w.r.t. mumps, polio, etc, but we need someone to push against the mandatory covid vac insanity...and against FB censorship, and he has the lib credentials to do it (even though I think he is otherwise crazy).

23
glow-operator-2-0 23 points ago +23 / -0

If the big pharmaceutical companies don't like it, RFK Jr. is going to meet RFK via Arkancide.

God protect him.

2
FlimboFlongins 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's been a pain in their ass for a long time. And his Dad was killed by Thane Eugene Caesar, who was a Security Contractor for Lockheed, and was directly behind him in the hotel kitchen. Thane was working on Black Projects, specifically providing security for Advanced Aircraft Systems and their development. There are connections to the Defense Industrial Security Command. RFK was a threat to these projects as they were back engineering disc shaped craft well beyond the control of the Office of The President, and certainly beyond Congress. JFK was pushing for more control over the issue, and recognized the scope and scale of the threat, wanting to involve the Soviets in a unified human threat response. Which is why they both had to go, according to the Lawyer/Confidant/Friend of E. Howard Hunt. The Atty revealed some of this info after Hunt died.

DARK JOURNALIST X-PROTECT: UFO FILE ASSASSINS DOCUMENTARY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1S8G_mep6ME

So it's a different beast that RFK Jr. is up against.

1
glow-operator-2-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Drugs are probably more useful and profitable than saucer shaped craft 😅

1
FlimboFlongins 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not why $21 Trillion has been spent on these projects since 1998. That's what has "Gone Missing" from the US Budget, disappearing into this Classified Black Hole. The teams who are analyzing the US Budget on their first study had only gone back that far when they published.

https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2017/msu-scholars-find-21-trillion-in-unauthorized-government-spending-defense-department-to-conduct/

Now they're doing the years before 1998. It's the single largest project expenditure the US has ever invested in. This is what happens when your Defense Establishment encounters advanced aerial craft which are so far beyond it's own technical capability, that it has to launch an unprecedented TS/ SCI effort at trying to create effective defense technologies. We're not alone in The Universe, boys and girls. It's what Space Force is all about, and attempting to bring the program back under Presidential Control. Dr. John Trump( DJT's Favorite Uncle), of MIT, worked directly on these projects, and within these programs. He shared a lot with his Nephew. Look into it.

1
glow-operator-2-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

And all this time, I thought XCOM was total fiction.

1
FlimboFlongins 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh. There you are. Little Michigan State cup of coffee perk you up a bit? That Research Blend they're roasting is a real eye opener, huh?

Our Very Stable Genius is in the thick of this fight, and a Faction of Defense Intelligence has been behind him for quite some time. Most people have no idea how deep this really goes. If the opposing forces are not stopped in their advancement, they gain control of Orbital Weapons Platforms, and ships, which are not supposed to exist. Then our little pop guns and street wars mean nothing.

I'll keep hammering. This is why the Dems/ What's really behind them are throwing everything they've got at us. This game is for ALL THE MARBLES.

13
crypticreptile 13 points ago +13 / -0

Safe well tested and highly effective vaccines are great. The COVID vaccines are being rushed, skipping animal testing entirely, and all the companies are demanding government release them from any potential liability due to the obvious risks - all to treat a virus which is unlikely to even effect most people.

I'm totally down to take a covid vaccine, once we have enough evidence that I know it's safer than getting the virus itself. Given my age and health that means it'll have to prove no side effects whatsoever in healthy patients. So in a few years, when that evidence might exist, I'll consider it.

12
ChrisSuperDude 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'm not an anti-vaxxer either, but I believe anti-vaxxers have the right to their opinion. They have the right to share their opinion and beliefs. I also believe that anti-vaxxers raise legitimate concerns and questions on the topic. I do not trust any Wuhan vaccine that they might propose and am against any type of forced vaccine for any disease.

7
DebbieinDallas 7 points ago +9 / -2

Do you remember the Swine Flu vaccine? And old people all lined up for the shot and then keeled over? Sure made a lasting impression on me as a kid, and reminded me of lining up for the gas chambers. No reason for a half-assed vaccine when you have remedies, though the media tries to suppress the news.

12
HiddenDekuScrub 12 points ago +13 / -1

I'm actually starting to wonder if the concept of an "anti vaxxer" is a psyop at this point.

There are, sometimes, legitimate reasons for forgoing vaccines. My cat's vet actually only recommends the bare minimum vaccinations because her littermate caught cancer around the area where vaccinations are typically given and it claimed her life.

I've noticed over the years that the media tends to create and invent wedge issues out of thin air. Who's to say the media hasn't been taking legitimate vaccine issues and worries and ruining the lives of those who had valid needs to decline? In order to create a "villain" for them to be a "hero" against? We certainly see that a lot with SJWs.

Remember the whole Harry Potter debacle of the late 90s? Did anybody seriously know a church that believed it was turning people into Wiccans before the media got involved? Well? Did you? No. Once the media kept harping on it, people seemed forced to choose a side for their principles, whatever those principles were. I always suspected that it was a purposely driven wedge to create a "good guy" and a "bad guy" for people to be divided against. For what purpose? At the time I believed it was ratings and money. Whatever you think of J.K. Rowling, the whole thing was smelly.

I sure as heck don't know if it's all about ratings and money now. The media is out to balkanize us. Deep state indeed. I may be completely wrong. But I've been suspicious for a while.

5
DebbieinDallas 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sorry about your cat. And I dont know anything about your Harry Potter analogy as I live in the world of 1950s-1960s reruns to help me cope and remind me of when life was normal. But JK Rowling has sure been kicking butt lately about real women vs. men dressed up like Milton Berle.

9
OutcastSeal 9 points ago +9 / -0

I deleted my Facebook. I decided not to give them any more power over me

23
ChrisTheSoberITGuy 23 points ago +23 / -0

I just saw a post from my brother that was "fact checked".

He posted the video of Kamala calling 18-24 year olds too stupid. There is no context that could make her look better, but it's being censored and "fact checked"

Fuck Facebook, I can't wait for it to die and force my family members to something like Parler.

9
bellcurvestrikesback [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

What did the fact check state? Post it if you took a pic

7
ChrisTheSoberITGuy 7 points ago +7 / -0

It links to this: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/17/fact-check-kamala-harris-clip-saying-young-people-stupid-misleads/3381327001/

Here's the video he shared: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRD0qrgPyA

There is LITERALLY NO SAVING HER from what she said, and they did it anyway.

1
Sunfast21 1 point ago +1 / -0

Video unavailable :/

1
ChrisTheSoberITGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

They removed it, look what happens when you search for it

https://thedonald.win/p/GvB0MpPg/

Here's another one, wait for it to be deleted https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRD0qrgPyAI

5
labajada 5 points ago +5 / -0

You have 1 friends: Tom 👍

16
Mintap 16 points ago +16 / -0

If a majority of doctors are saying men can become women and vice versa, or if their professional associations are saying it, then I will not trust those professional associations regarding other issues like vaccines. I am pro-science and against the politicization of medicine.

3
WU_HAN_FRU 3 points ago +3 / -0

This.

2
hit_backspace 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are monetary incentives in everything they say in publicized events. Real doctors work in hospitals every day to treat real people and help them get better. The loudmouths should be automatically suspected of lying.

9
SoldanoSlo 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yep, "fact" checking is misnomer. It's opinion checking.

5
quigonkenny 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fix Section 230, dammit

2
hit_backspace 2 points ago +2 / -0

Repeal the whole thing and draft new laws. It should be a unilateral thing in Congress. Democrats not too long ago also hated big tech since they can basically blackmail democrats with messages, videos or anything else that paints them negatively.

1
Yupyupyup 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the real issue.

5
sumgen7 5 points ago +5 / -0

RFK is not an anti-vaxxer - he just wants safe vaccines. His crew of attorneys took the HHS to court last year I think it was to force them to provide evidence of vaccine safety - they could provide none, nil, zero - because it actually does not exist. There is absolutely no random double-blind placebo testing on any vaccine - the gold standard Fauci wants HCQ to be judged on. Ofc in 1986 the legislation Reagan signed exempted big-Pharma from all liability from vaccines, after the companies complained they were losing 20 times more money in court settlements for vaccine damage than they made on vaccines. The US taxpayer pays the fines in the shambolic token gesture vaccine court.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
thewordwolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

The best Kennedy

3
leakmouth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes I always fact check my doctor when he offers his opinion

That’s why it’s called an opinion! You fucking retards

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
WU_HAN_FRU 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is happening with this Kennedy, here?

It is strange to see a Democrat exhibiting ANY sort of nonconformity.

7
bellcurvestrikesback [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Probably got mad seeing his father and uncle killed and his other uncle framed

6
ChrisSuperDude 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know it's kind of a Charlie Cuck/Prager U meme to say but it is true, if JFK and Bobby Kennedy were around today, they would not be allowed in the Democratic party. That's why they had those 2 killed but let Ted live.

-7
PinochetIsMyHero -7 points ago +1 / -8

He's an antivaxxer kind of loon. He probably wants Zuckbook to stop fact-checking his Jenny McCarthy "I have huge boobs so I know all about vaccines!" memes.

3
GoldenEagle1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Given everything happening right now with the medical mafia did you ever think jabbing yourself with a needle full of God knows what is really a good idea?

2
Sunfast21 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do we need to state we’re not anti-Vaxxers? The left has made this a wrong or right issue. Why can’t we use critics thinking to determine whether or not we want a rushed vaccine for a virus that won’t affect us. Why does pausing to think about whether that’s a good idea or not (look up negative affects of some vaccines) make you an anti-vaxxer. It’s to make you look stupid and to feel bad for critically thinking that’s why. They want you ashamed, and strung in with anti-Vaxxers who would refuse to give their own dying child the cure because it doesn’t fit their beliefs

2
G_regulator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Either all speech is permitted or no speech is permitted. There is no middle ground.