if only there was a reporter who would ask her what she meant by that response. laughing is not clarification. if she doesn't then i'll be forced to assume that she meant "I was lying when I said I believed his accusers, because a debate to me is simply a lying contest where you tell as many lies as possible to make your opponents look bad" and this is actually the best reasoning I can come up with that makes her look the least terrible.
That is the best (least bad) response. The other is that she knows it's true and rather than fight for the truth and what's right she'll excuse a woman being assaulted for personal gain. Like all those Hollywood chicks who slept their way to the top and knew what went on with their rapey producers and directors towards other girls, boys, etc. She's the epitome of the #MeToo movement.
The press ought to have asked Kamala Harris why, when she was Attorney General of California from 2011 to 2017, she did not prosecute Harvey Weinstein for rape.
Or why she did not return the thousands of dollars of political donations she received from him.
Of all the bad actors out there, I think the press is the worst. Academics really believe in things like critical race theory. SJWs believe their own bullshit. Even BLM is surprisingly honest. I mean, they say on their own website they want to "disrupt" your family. That is almost crazy honest.
But it's the press who misleads and lies plays cover for their allies. It's the press who portrays BLM as a 1960s peace movement.
They are never going to make Kamala look bad. Because they have been subverted into believing their job is to make the world a better place, that is one that reflects their personal values and puts their friends in positions of power.
if only there was a reporter who would ask her what she meant by that response. laughing is not clarification. if she doesn't then i'll be forced to assume that she meant "I was lying when I said I believed his accusers, because a debate to me is simply a lying contest where you tell as many lies as possible to make your opponents look bad" and this is actually the best reasoning I can come up with that makes her look the least terrible.
That is the best (least bad) response. The other is that she knows it's true and rather than fight for the truth and what's right she'll excuse a woman being assaulted for personal gain. Like all those Hollywood chicks who slept their way to the top and knew what went on with their rapey producers and directors towards other girls, boys, etc. She's the epitome of the #MeToo movement.
The press ought to have asked Kamala Harris why, when she was Attorney General of California from 2011 to 2017, she did not prosecute Harvey Weinstein for rape.
Or why she did not return the thousands of dollars of political donations she received from him.
https://pagesix.com/2020/08/18/rose-mcgowan-rips-kamala-harris-over-harvey-weinstein-donation/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris
Of all the bad actors out there, I think the press is the worst. Academics really believe in things like critical race theory. SJWs believe their own bullshit. Even BLM is surprisingly honest. I mean, they say on their own website they want to "disrupt" your family. That is almost crazy honest.
But it's the press who misleads and lies plays cover for their allies. It's the press who portrays BLM as a 1960s peace movement.
They are never going to make Kamala look bad. Because they have been subverted into believing their job is to make the world a better place, that is one that reflects their personal values and puts their friends in positions of power.
Exactly what I thought. No other implication.
I'm still waiting for the #reeetoo crowd to crucify her for that one....
Spez: im bad at words