264
Comments (16)
sorted by:
17
Pres_Trump 17 points ago +17 / -0

A reminder that these are real people not just black words against a white background. Federal Judges are normal people just like you and me.

15
Dumdum 15 points ago +15 / -0

May God bring swift justice

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
8
Npc-1776 8 points ago +8 / -0

There aren't words to describe my thoughts, desires, and actions that I want to take.

4
p8riot 4 points ago +4 / -0

My spidey sense is tingling.. this video is her pleading to keep Federal judges information private. Is that good for the republic?

7
MrSnappy [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

she just had her son killed and her husband shot...and now she knows she's in the crosshairs...think i'd be pleading too ...just sayin

3
p8riot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't doubt that she honestly feels this way now, but just think. If de-listing judges was the intended result in some 8D chess, then a hit like that is the exact way to do it.

So again I ask, is that a good thing for the republic?

2
derkoff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only consequence I can see is judges being less bribeable or intimidatable so it seems like a good thing.

1
p8riot 1 point ago +1 / -0

The people who would bribe a Federal judge don't need the yellow pages to do it

2
N900mixalot 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the Chief Justice's job. Not hers.

This is very telling.

1
Taggart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personal Privacy should be a right for everyone. If you are public, then your public persona “aka Judge should be available to contact at the “Public Place”. In other words the courthouse. The right to someone else’s personal life is not a right. The constitution seems clear that private lives were meant to be respected. This right of privacy is something that is a right. It requires nothing from anybody else to fulfill. The access to public records for house, property, utilities, registrations, gun ownership, etc.... should be protected from public inquiry without the aid of law enforcement and for only lawful purposes.

1
p8riot 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be an interesting discussion and decision, for EVERYONE to be afforded these rights.. I would entertain this idea for sure.

However as it stands, this judge is asking for "special" treatment that us regular folk just aren't privileged / important enough to enjoy. All lives matter.

3
TearofLys 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think I can even imagine the heartache she feels.

3
N900mixalot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unbelievable that she had to do this when it's John Roberts' sworn duty as Chief Justice.

Very strange.

2
NvCrone 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am so sorry she has to go through this. It isn't right. But her answer isn't right either. Take the Judges' info off the net, and all the legislators and the police and let's just throw in anyone that pisses off BLM or Antifa, CEOs...I can go on. The guy was an attorney. Taking it off the internet wouldn't have stopped him.

2
c1one 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look into it, Epstein is still alive. He was extracted* before his "death" and a body double was put in the cell. He had plastic surgery to change his appearance. His surgeon was killed about a month later.

When you have billions of dollars, escaping jail, taking down planes, and killing judges is affordable.

*It was posted by anonymous that he was getting extracted by what appeared to be unmarked military before his death was announced. I read the post myself hours before his death was announced. Coincidences... Maybe, maybe not.

Found image of the swap post. https://images.app.goo.gl/MwHWDFB1qS4XsY1S8