Personal Privacy should be a right for everyone. If you are public, then your public persona “aka Judge should be available to contact at the “Public Place”. In other words the courthouse. The right to someone else’s personal life is not a right. The constitution seems clear that private lives were meant to be respected. This right of privacy is something that is a right. It requires nothing from anybody else to fulfill. The access to public records for house, property, utilities, registrations, gun ownership, etc.... should be protected from public inquiry without the aid of law enforcement and for only lawful purposes.
That would be an interesting discussion and decision, for EVERYONE to be afforded these rights.. I would entertain this idea for sure.
However as it stands, this judge is asking for "special" treatment that us regular folk just aren't privileged / important enough to enjoy. All lives matter.
Personal Privacy should be a right for everyone. If you are public, then your public persona “aka Judge should be available to contact at the “Public Place”. In other words the courthouse. The right to someone else’s personal life is not a right. The constitution seems clear that private lives were meant to be respected. This right of privacy is something that is a right. It requires nothing from anybody else to fulfill. The access to public records for house, property, utilities, registrations, gun ownership, etc.... should be protected from public inquiry without the aid of law enforcement and for only lawful purposes.
That would be an interesting discussion and decision, for EVERYONE to be afforded these rights.. I would entertain this idea for sure.
However as it stands, this judge is asking for "special" treatment that us regular folk just aren't privileged / important enough to enjoy. All lives matter.